- Joined
- Dec 1, 2010
- Messages
- 61,746
- Reaction score
- 32,385
- Location
- El Paso Strong
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
U.S. District Judge William Stickman IV, who was appointed by President Trump, sided with plaintiffs that included hair salons, drive-in movie theaters, a farmer's market vendor, a horse trainer and several Republican officeholders in their lawsuit against Wolf, a Democrat, and his health secretary.
**snip**
The governor's efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus "were undertaken with the good intention of addressing a public health emergency," Stickman wrote. "But even in an emergency, the authority of government is not unfettered."
Pennsylvania coronavirus restrictions deemed unconstitutional, federal judge rules | Fox News
A-****ing-men.
This is why judges matter.
Meh. This is one of those self-correcting problems.
What problem? I mean, I know why I had a problem with it, but there isn’t a lockdown restriction I’ve heard of which hasn’t been embraced by the left.
Makes Biden's insistence he'd lock us ALL down if elected even funnier.
People too stupid to take sensible precautions are a self-correcting problem. Off they go, the world will not miss them.
I have no doubt he’d try.
Fortunately it’s a small fraction that die from it.
What problem? I mean, I know why I had a problem with it, but there isn’t a lockdown restriction I’ve heard of which hasn’t been embraced by the left.
And another small fraction that get ****ed up for life.
Pennsylvania coronavirus restrictions deemed unconstitutional, federal judge rules | Fox News
A-****ing-men.
This is why judges matter.
How can we possibly know that?
And there hasn't been a chance to spread the virus the right hasnt embraced.
Fortunately it’s a small fraction that die from it.
The judge is basing his ruling under the First Amendment right for freedom of assembly. The judge is making quite a stretch in his interpretation in terms of it's applicability in this case. It's a weak argument and almost certain to be quickly overturned on appeal
It’s scary to me how many of you actually object to lifting government restrictions.
Why would it be scary to empower the government during a public health emergency?
How about "abuse of power"?
Really? Is it the right that’s supporting protesters not social distancing and yelling in the faces of others (like cops, diners in a restaurant, a US Senator) without masks?
It’s scary to me how many of you actually object to lifting government restrictions.
Why would it be scary to empower the government during a public health emergency? If we had 1M cases of ebola would you be making the same argument?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?