Have you noticed a pattern in which these "encounters" escalate because the Taser does not have the intended effect on the
subject resisting arrest, the subject becomes more aggressive instead of immobilized or subdued by the Taser and the surprised
LEO exhibits no planned back up reaction other than use of deadly force?
en.wikipedia.org
"..At 11:23,
[16] Rolfe told Brooks: "All right, I think you've had too much to drink to be driving. Put your hands behind your back for me";
[19] he and Brosnan then moved behind Brooks to handcuff him.
[14] Brooks tried to break free and he and the officers scuffled on the ground. During the struggle Brosnan drew his taser, but Brooks wrested it from him and fired it;
[24] Brosnan says the taser contacted him and he struck his head on the pavement, causing a concussion.
[20] Brooks stood up and punched Rolfe, who drew his own taser and fired both cartridges at Brooks with no effect.[21] Brooks fled through the parking lot with Brosnan's taser still in hand. While still running, Brooks glanced back, half-turned, and fired the second shot of Brosnan's taser – capable of two shots before being reloaded
[22] – at Rolfe but "his aim was high".
[15][23]
According to prosecutors, Brooks and Rolfe were 18 feet (5.5 m) apart
[25][a] when Rolfe dropped his taser, drew his handgun
[15] and shot Brooks once in the midback and once in the buttocks;
[26] prosecutors allege the third shot struck a nearby vehicle, .."
One officer has been fired and another placed on administrative duty. A Times video analysis shows the sequence of events leading to the fatal shooting.
www.nytimes.com
June 14, 2020
"..Mr. Brooks says “Mr. Rolfe, come on man. Mr. Rolfe.” He seizes a Taser from Officer Brosnan, stands up and punches Officer Rolfe. Officer Rolfe fires his Taser gun. The darts hit Mr. Brooks, and Officer Rolfe continues trying to stun him.
Mr. Brooks runs away, holding Officer Brosnan’s Taser gun. Officer Rolfe gives chase, and continues to try to stun Mr. Brooks..."