- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 68,960
- Reaction score
- 22,530
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
You are incorrect. A "Deputy Prime Minister" and there can be more than one of them, gets to exercise ONLY those powers that the Prime Minister tells them they can exercise and can NOT make decisions in the absence of the Prime Minister.According to what I cited here it was the DPM that had issued the threat. If I'm not mistaken (and I very well could be because your system of Government is weird) that is like the VP of our country where in the event of the PM being unable to fulfill their obligations the DPM fills in.
Oh yes, that the Prime Minister can fire a DPM and appoint a new one whenever they feel like it.
Mind you, that goes along with the fact that Canadian political parties can "fire" their leaders (which happens to include the Prime Minister) and select new ones whenever they feel like it too. And, of course, the elected members of Canadian political parties can "fire" their leaders (which happens to include the Prime Minister) and select new ones whenever they feel like it too.
AND, strangely enough, should any of that happen there is neither a "constitutional crisis" nor a breakdown of government.
I believe that most Canadian executives know that the Deputy Prime Minister is a federal and not provincial politician.That seems to suggest it's a threat coming from the Federal, not a provincial politician.