This is what you wrote in your first post in this thread
Yes, you condemned O'Reilly, but IMHO you did so in an extremely mild way, yet you continue to rant on about Randi Rhodes. How come?
And yet you still haven't apologized for Rhodes.
Randi Rhodes' words that you cited were meant as comedy. They were in bad taste, and she apologized profusely. How about O'Reilly? Haven't seen him apologize?
Oh you did just apologize but in a very mild way . . . hypocrit. Comedy sketch? Was the Godfather a comedy now?
Regardless, this thread is about O'Reilly, not Rhodes. While it's OK to make a comparison to Rhodes it is not appropriate to dwell on Rhodes as your defense for O'Reilly. They are two different threads.
I answered a direct line of questioning in relation to left wing commentators and it's you who keeps bringing it up because you said I was back peddling and I responded. What am I not able to respond to a question in relation to back peddling without bringing up what I was supposedly back peddling about?
O'Reilly was wrong to say what he said. I know that he didn't mean it literally, but he said it to hurt people in California. He said it with malice. He's too smart to speak off the cuff, so his remarks were calculated, and that is what, to me, is so wrong.
Would he be to stupid not to be able to speak off the cuff? Ad-libbings a talent not a hindrence. How do you know it was calculated are you psychic now do you have some special ability to see inside O'reilly's brain now?