- Joined
- Mar 9, 2012
- Messages
- 6,277
- Reaction score
- 2,052
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
And now Hillary basically wants to do the same thing for women.... and most women dislike her for even suggesting it.
The DNC and their media and education industries have succeeded into painting white men as the new "N" word.
Using politically correctness as a weapon, the have been harassed in court, in person, and in the workforce. I'm surprised we are still taxed at the same rate!
But for some reason they just refuse to go away. Obama tried, Hillary promises to try too. The media flat out hates is. Television makes fun of us. Yet we take the jobs offered to us, because we are too proud to live on welfare and admit it, let alone brag about it. We have our dirt bags, sure. But don't put them up as role models, yet even if we believe in the "old ways" of marriage, two parent households, we are told be are "irrelevant" and ignorant.
Yep. White people got to go. They are the only ones standing between Trump and "free stuff"!
Op-Ed: 'Whites need not apply' at D.C. labor board?
By Hans A. von Spakovsky • 6/3/13 12:00 AM
Ondray Harris, the African-American executive director of the Public Employee Relations Board of the District of Columbia, stepped down last week.
His resignation letter provides a disturbing look at alleged discriminatory and partisan conduct by the members of the board tasked with overseeing labor issues and the D.C. government's relations with public employees.
Harris claimed in his letter that two members of the board, Don Wasserman and Ann Hoffman, complained over his hiring of a white female, Erin Wilcox, because they perceived her "as being conservative or politically right-of-center."
According to Harris, at a meeting on Nov. 8, 2012, Hoffman declared that "somebody with a resume like hers doesn't belong here" and "should never work here."
Harris said he was "rebuked" by Wasserman for hiring white male employees despite the fact that no challenge was ever made by the board members to their professional "qualifications, competency, or efficiency."
In fact, Wasserman told Harris to "refrain from hiring white men" in the future to fill open attorney slots, according to Harris.
As a civil rights lawyer and the former Deputy Chief of Employment Litigation in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Justice Department, Harris vehemently opposed these "illegal, unconstitutional, and discriminatory comments and hiring demands," telling the board that it was asking him "to hire in a discriminatory fashion based on race, gender, and political associations."
He warned the board that he would resign rather than carry out such policies.
Harris said the events of the Nov. 8 meeting were "so outrageous, shocking, and troubling" that he sought legal advice, including from the board's counsel, Keturah Harley.
...
The idea that minorities have more power than white people in the United States is just the best.
Why don't you ask the President of the United States about it?
Or any one of Obama's, Many times over Population Representation, Black Cabinet Members?
Or the A.G.?
Or Henry Louis Gates?
or Gwendolyn Boyd? or Christopher B. Howard? or Freeman A. Hrabowski III? or Shirley Ann Jackson? or Walter M. Kimbrough? or Ruth Simmons?
Or any of the 18% of the Federal Workforce who are Black, even though they only represent 12% of the Population?
Or any one of the recipients of Black-Scholarships? ( Have you ever heard of a White ONLY Scholarship? )
Or any of of the attendees of Black-Universities? ( The do NOT allow White ONLY Universities! )
Or any of the thousands of "Smart" Blacks we see in TV advertisements Sneering at the "Foolish" White Guy who doesn't buy product XYZ?
You're denial won't change what is Obvious to the REST of U.S.!
-
You used the word "white" too much. Therefore you are deemed a racist. Comply or enroll in your friendly neighborhood re-education camp.
So... what color did you decide to paint your own cross?
Why don't you ask the President of the United States about it?
Or any one of Obama's, Many times over Population Representation, Black Cabinet Members?
Or the A.G.?
Or Henry Louis Gates?
or Gwendolyn Boyd? or Christopher B. Howard? or Freeman A. Hrabowski III? or Shirley Ann Jackson? or Walter M. Kimbrough? or Ruth Simmons?
Or any of the 18% of the Federal Workforce who are Black, even though they only represent 12% of the Population?
Or any one of the recipients of Black-Scholarships? ( Have you ever heard of a White ONLY Scholarship? )
Or any of of the attendees of Black-Universities? ( The do NOT allow White ONLY Universities! )
Or any of the thousands of "Smart" Blacks we see in TV advertisements Sneering at the "Foolish" White Guy who doesn't buy product XYZ?
You're denial won't change what is Obvious to the REST of U.S.!
-
Of the 15 members of Obama's cabinet, four are minorities.
So, when Low-Income-Whites are Blatantly Discriminated against, we're just supposed to meekly accept our fate and "Due-Punishment" for our Racial Birth Guilt?
-
All you are doing here is whining for attention. Time for you to learn some personal responsibility.
I see.... Whites who want True Equality, and not be forced from jobs and careers by Blatant, Official, Racial Discrimination by Government... are Whining.
When 72 people from my section of the Los Alamos Labs Stockpile Stewardship program were forced out of their jobs and careers, out of a workforce of a bit over 600...
As part of a program which gave $10K personal paycheck bonuses to level 3 managers who forced White-Males out of careers, accepting a 2 week severance package...
We were supposed to just smile and thank them for racially discriminating against U.S. ?
Well, not much "Personal Responsibility" any of U.S. who were forced-out can take for the Race and Gender we were born with!
We did not CHOOSE to be born White Males!
Anyone who thinks that it was our fault, or was Just, can Go to Hell!
There is a reckoning coming to the American Left, and it cannot come too soon, or be too Harsh!
-
Cool victim story bro!
Oh look, a baiting Troll.
I had heard there was actual serious debate and conversation here, but, alas, it appears the Lefties are just Trolls.
-
I see.... Whites who want True Equality, and not be forced from jobs and careers by Blatant, Official, Racial Discrimination by Government... are Whining.
When 72 people from my section of the Los Alamos Labs Stockpile Stewardship program were forced out of their jobs and careers, out of a workforce of a bit over 600...
As part of a program which gave $10K personal paycheck bonuses to level 3 managers who forced White-Males out of careers, accepting a 2 week severance package...
We were supposed to just smile and thank them for racially discriminating against U.S. ?
Well, not much "Personal Responsibility" any of U.S. who were forced-out can take for the Race and Gender we were born with!
We did not CHOOSE to be born White Males!
Anyone who thinks that it was our fault, or was Just, can Go to Hell!
There is a reckoning coming to the American Left, and it cannot come too soon, or be too Harsh!
-
I don't buy for a second that managers were given bonuses and perks for targeting white males for layoffs.
U.S. Dept. of Energy Reverse Discrimination
Argonne Lab (Dept. of Energy) Sued for Reverse Discrimination (updated 07-22-02)
The Argonne National Laboratory is staffed by 400 Department of Energy employees and is located near Chicago, Illinois. It is a nuclear research facility.
DOE employee John Kasprowicz and six other workers at Argonne National Laboratory have filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit in federal court against Argonne and the Department of Energy. According to the Sun-Times, they are suing for back pay, job promotions and $300,000 each for damages. The case may go to trial later this year (2002).
QUOTE: "[DOE's] problem, according to a federal lawsuit filed by Kasprowicz and six others, was that they were white men, and that supervisors, eager to promote minorities, froze them out in an effort to make them go away."
-- Chicago Sun-Times
See also DOE Minority Statistics, below.
The lawsuit against DOE charges the following:
Managers at Argonne received annual "super bonuses" of $10,000 to $20,000 (on top of their $120,000 salaries) for hiring and promoting women and minorities over white males. Argonne calls this "meeting or exceeding diversity goals".
26 of 29 promotions at Argonne went to minorities and women -- and only 3 went to white males -- between 1989 and 1993. (Government attorneys who have been fighting the suit for the past 5 years said that at least 1 of the 26 minorities was more qualified than the whites who were passed over!)
In order to make room for meeting federal hiring quotas for minorities, dozens of highly qualified white male engineers, scientists and other career employees were transferred to a "white male dinosaur" office with the euphemistic official title "Safety and Technical Services Division (STS)". There they received few or even no work assignments for years on end. Argonne’s hope was that the "dinosaurs" would quit or retire. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, one manager even made it a habit to stop by the "dinosaur" office periodically to say "'When are you going to retire, old fellow?' or, 'What are you still doing around here?' "
When the affected white male workers complained of this treatment, they were retaliated against. Argonne management forced 35 other employees to sign a petition in which they were required to indicate their support of Argonne’s discriminatory actions against the "white male dinosaurs".
September 7, 2012
Racial Preferences in ObamaCare
By Allan J. Favish
Though there seem to be no other news organizations covering the topic, it is nonetheless true that ObamaCare includes racial preferences, called "priorities" in the law. When the first version of ObamaCare appeared in a bill, I wrote about the racial preferences in it here for American Thinker on July 21, 2009. Now that we have a final version of the law, it is reasonably safe to elaborate how those preferences have evolved.
(All 906 pages of ObamaCare, officially known as The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, 111th Congress, can be read here.)
Under ObamaCare, if a medical or dental school wants to increase its chances of receiving many different kinds of grants and contracts from the federal government, it should "have a record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities." This is because ObamaCare requires the secretary of health and human services to give priority to the entities that have demonstrated such a record in the awarding of these grants and contracts to medical and dental schools and other entities.
ObamaCare does not state what would qualify as a "record" of such training, so we can expect medical and dental schools and the other entities to do whatever they think they can get away with to train as many "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities" as necessary to have a better "record" in this regard than their competitors. ObamaCare creates a significant financial incentive for medical and dental schools and other entities to lower admission standards for "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities" if that is what it takes to have the winning "record" of such training.
In Section 5301, ObamaCare states that the HHS secretary:
... may make grants to, or enter into contracts with, ... [a] school of medicine or osteopathic medicine ... which the Secretary has determined is capable of carrying out such grant or contract --
(A) to plan, develop, operate, or participate in an accredited professional training program, including an accredited residency or internship program in the field of family medicine, general internal medicine, or general pediatrics for medical students, interns, residents, or practicing physicians as defined by the Secretary[.]
ObamaCare then states that the "ecretary may make grants to or enter into contracts with accredited schools of medicine or osteopathic medicine to establish, maintain, or improve ... programs that improve clinical teaching and research in" the fields defined above, or "programs that integrate academic administrative units in" the fields defined above "to enhance interdisciplinary recruitment, training, and faculty development."
In a subsection entitled "Priorities in Making Awards," ObamaCare states: "In awarding grants or contracts under" the paragraphs quoted above, "the Secretary shall give priority to qualified applicants that ... have a record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups[.]"
ObamaCare's race-based "priorities" extend to dental education as well. Section 5303 of ObamaCare states that the "ecretary may make grants to, or enter into contracts with, a school of dentistry, public or nonprofit private hospital, or a public or private nonprofit entity" for the following purposes:
(A) to plan, develop, and operate, or participate in, an approved professional training program in the field of general dentistry, pediatric dentistry, or public health dentistry for dental students, residents, practicing dentists, dental hygienists, or other approved primary care dental trainees, that emphasizes training for general, pediatric, or public health dentistry;
(B) to provide financial assistance to dental students, residents, practicing dentists, and dental hygiene students who are in need thereof, who are participants in any such program, and who plan to work in the practice of general, pediatric, public heath dentistry, or dental hygiene;
(C) to plan, develop, and operate a program for the training of oral health care providers who plan to teach in general, pediatric, public health dentistry, or dental hygiene;
(D) to provide financial assistance in the form of traineeships and fellowships to dentists who plan to teach or are teaching in general, pediatric, or public health dentistry; ...
...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?