I am for protecting people's civil rights regardless of their race or gender.
not if you know anything about Use of Force.
so the police shooting unarmed protesters is ok
Well, sure, if you ignore the facts that she was part of a larger angry, violent mob who broke into the Capitol and fought with police. Some of whom were calling for the deaths of the vice president and House Speaker. Byrd believed he had heard gunshots shots in the House chamber, heard "officer down" over the radio, law enforcement standing next to him being threatened to let the mob into the House chamber with, "we don't wanna hurt you." It wasn't just her he was up against. He was up against a mob, violent breaking through the doors to the area he was in. She just happened to be the first one stupid enough to try a climb over the barricade. Fortunately, no one else tried.
Saying things over and over doesn’t make things true.
he used unnecessary force, resulting in her death.
doesn't when you do it either.
Do you break into a lot of places and crawl through broken windows or doors and get caught or shot at by security and then scream civil rights?
nope, Floyd and Babbit both died as a result of lethal force. UNNECESARY lethal force.
So we have the right to disobey an officer of the law who is pointing a gun at you and telling you to stop? There are a lot of dead people who tried that. She also was part of a mob trying to hang the Vice President.Michael Byrd should be charged with violating the civil rights of Ashli Babbitt.
4th Amendment Rights
The Civil Rights Act of 1871, which is codified as 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and commonly known as “Section 1983,” prohibits any person from violating constitutional rights while acting “under the color of law.” In other words, it is unlawful for someone acting in an official governmental capacity to deprive another person of their constitutional rights.Civil Rights Act Section 1983 & Excessive Force by Police
NOTE: This blog article was amended to reflect recent changes to U.S. federal law with passage of the First Step Act (P.L. 115- 391). Since December 21, 2018, the First Step Act required numerous changes to the federal criminal justice […]www.federalcriminallawyer.us
Excessive force is a type of police misconduct where the officer’s actions go beyond the bounds of force that a reasonable officer would use under the same circumstances. These cases focus on the objective reasonableness of the force used – not whether the arrestee was injured. Whether the officer’s use of force was excessive depends largely on the circumstances and facts of each specific case. A judge or jury will weigh the available evidence and applicable laws to determine whether or not the police officer applied a reasonable amount of force.
why are you fighting against civil rights?
Doesn’t when you do it either.
It’s all they got.