• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Officer Byrd violated her civil rights

Jagged said:
Show your proof that Democrats were in charge of the Department of Justice and the Capitol Police Board?
Click to expand...
That poster seems to have forgotten that her rapey felonious god was the head of the Executive Branch when this riot happened.
 
Buster Keaton said:
Here is an example of an excessive force civil rights violation that some of you might remember.
There have been many cases of 4th Amendment civil rights violations.


www.latimes.com

U.S. Files Civil Rights Charges Against 4 Officers in King Case : Indictments: Federal prosecutor says beating 'was an unreasonable use of force.' If convicted, each man faces up to 10 years in prison and fines.

Federal prosecutors unsealed a two-count indictment against four Los Angeles police officers Wednesday, reigniting the explosive legal battle over the 1991 beating of Rodney G.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com
Federal prosecutors unsealed a two-count indictment against four Los Angeles police officers Wednesday, reigniting the explosive legal battle over the 1991 beating of Rodney G. King with new charges that the officers violated King’s civil rights.

The indictment was handed up by a federal grand jury late Tuesday but was sealed until Wednesday morning so that prosecutors could notify local authorities, said Lourdes G. Baird, the U.S. attorney for the Central District of California. Charged in the indictment are the same four officers--Sgt. Stacey C. Koon and officers Timothy W. Wind, Laurence M. Powell and Theodore J. Briseno--who were tried in state court earlier this year and acquitted on all but one count.

“The defendants are charged with stomping, kicking and beating Mr. King,” Baird said during a morning news conference called to announce the indictments. “It was an unreasonable use of force.”
Click to expand...
The statute of limitations has run on this.
 
Buster Keaton said:
Michael Byrd should be charged with violating the civil rights of Ashli Babbitt.

4th Amendment Rights

Civil Rights Act Section 1983 & Excessive Force by Police

NOTE: This blog article was amended to reflect recent changes to U.S. federal law with passage of the First Step Act (P.L. 115- 391). Since December 21, 2018, the First Step Act required numerous changes to the federal criminal justice […]
www.federalcriminallawyer.us www.federalcriminallawyer.us
The Civil Rights Act of 1871, which is codified as 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and commonly known as “Section 1983,” prohibits any person from violating constitutional rights while acting “under the color of law.” In other words, it is unlawful for someone acting in an official governmental capacity to deprive another person of their constitutional rights.
Excessive force is a type of police misconduct where the officer’s actions go beyond the bounds of force that a reasonable officer would use under the same circumstances. These cases focus on the objective reasonableness of the force used – not whether the arrestee was injured. Whether the officer’s use of force was excessive depends largely on the circumstances and facts of each specific case. A judge or jury will weigh the available evidence and applicable laws to determine whether or not the police officer applied a reasonable amount of force.
Click to expand...
This bullshit again?

She was part of a violent, armed mob, that was actively breaking into a secured area through which we were evacuating our nation's leaders during a violent sedition against the Republic.
 
trouble13 said:
He should be charged with murder because that was what it was. He should also be charged for attempting to cover it up because that's what he did.
Click to expand...
Wait, what? What covering up did he do? This is getting really really ridiculous.... 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
Buster Keaton said:
This issue is showing that the crazy left wingers do not have any real principles, all that have is anger, ignorance and hate.
They are actually opposing her 4endment civil rights.
Click to expand...
What a load of dingos' kidneys....🤣🤣🤣
 
trouble13 said:
I'm not crying about it. It's a matter of record that he used lethal force against without warning and he then created a false cover story over the radio to justify his murder. He should be charged for that. Whether or not he will be is another story.
Click to expand...
:poop: :poop: :poop:
 
WilHaftaWaite said:
Babbitt was.
Click to expand...
Nope, Babbitt was part of a violent, armed mob attacking Congress and breaking into a secured area where our nation's leaders were being evacuated during a violent sedition.

That's not murder, murder is an unjustified killing. Sedition can have consequences.
 
Ikari said:
Nope, Babbitt was part of a violent, armed mob attacking Congress and breaking into a secured area where our nation's leaders were being evacuated during a violent sedition.

That's not murder, murder is an unjustified killing. Sedition can have consequences.
Click to expand...
and Byrd used unnecessary force to stop her, resulting in her death.
 
WilHaftaWaite said:
and Byrd used unnecessary force to stop her, resulting in her death.
Click to expand...
Nope. Don't be part of an armed, violent mob breaking into secured areas.

She wasn't there just "protesting". The MAGA Seditionists should be grateful that Capitol Police were so reserved during their violent, armed sedition.
 
mike2810 said:
and it was determined Byrd action was proper for the situation he and others faced.
Click to expand...
by the people he worked for.

a jury trial may have had a different result, with a prosecutor explaining the levels of Use of Force.
 
Ikari said:
Nope. Don't be part of an armed, violent mob breaking into secured areas.

She wasn't there just "protesting". The MAGA Seditionists should be grateful that Capitol Police were so reserved during their violent, armed sedition.
Click to expand...
sad take on it.
 
WilHaftaWaite said:
sad take on it.
Click to expand...
Tis reality, sorry you don't like it.

Sedition is dangerous business, it's best not to engage in it. But if you do, there could be consequences. Though Trump did pardon all his good commie followers.
 
Ikari said:
Though Trump did pardon all his good commie followers.
Click to expand...
thanks for proving this forum isn't worth commenting in.

Bodecea will remember me as a mod on another board she is on. the mods there would never flaunt their partisan leanings the way you do.

for general information, I don't like Trump, I've never voted for him, and believe he, Biden, and the Clintons shouldn't be allowed within 500 miles of DC.
.
My issue is with Byrd going against his training, training I spent 30 years using at work, first in the military, and then as a Corrections officer.

you obviously let your views of Trump rule your responses.

sad.

you should give up your position to someone more moderate.
 
WilHaftaWaite said:
and Byrd used unnecessary force to stop her, resulting in her death.
Click to expand...
Nah, his job was to keep that angry, violent mob, which was threatening law enforcement, out of the Speaker's lobby. They attempted to break in anyway, posing a threat to the police officers, members of Congress and staff.
 
Jagged said:
Nah, his job was to keep that angry, violent mob, which was threatening law enforcement, out of the Speaker's lobby. They attempted to break in anyway, posing a threat to the police officers, members of Congress and staff.
Click to expand...
which did NOT require lethal force.
 
WilHaftaWaite said:
which did NOT require lethal force.
Click to expand...
He felt it did. Under the attack of an angry, violent mob, verbally threatening officers, breaking through locked doors, and about to breach a makeshift barricade of furniture with the explicit intent of keeping members of Congress and staff safe, 2 independent investigations, one by Trump's own Department of Justice, found it reasonable.
 
Jagged said:
He felt it did. Under the attack of an angry, violent mob, verbally threatening officers, breaking through locked doors, and about to breach a makeshift barricade of furniture with the explicit intent of keeping members of Congress and staff safe, 2 independent investigations, one by Trump's own Department of Justice, found it reasonable.
Click to expand...
Jagged said:
He felt it did.
Click to expand...
then he was in the wrong place, at the wrong time, and should have received appropriate punishment, not a gold medal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom