• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Officer Byrd violated her civil rights

Ashley Babbit was breaking and entering. Ashley Babbit failed to comply with the LEO's verbal orders. Ashley Babbit was part of a massive unruly mob that posed a threat. Her behavior got her shot.

I hope the jury is wise enough to see through the BS and find for the defendant.

The Jury in question would be in Washington DC. The place where Trump and MAGA have a popularity rating just about even with Herpes.
 
then he was in the wrong place, at the wrong time, and should have received appropriate punishment, not a gold medal.
Nope, he was in exactly the right place. Thanks to him, no one from that angry, violent mob injured and police officers, members of Congress, or their staff.
 
and Byrd used unnecessary force to stop her, resulting in her death.
Nope.

She was part of a mob of terrorists who were building gallows outside.

She illegally entered the building and trespassed in a secured area.

Defending terrorism does not look good for anybody but least off all a former sailor.
 
Nope.

She was part of a mob of terrorists who were building gallows outside.

She illegally entered the building and trespassed in a secured area.

Defending terrorism does not look good for anybody but least off all a former sailor.
She was part of a mob of terrorists who were building gallows outside.
she was a protestor. not a terrorist.
Yup
Defending terrorism does not look good for anybody but least off all a former sailor.
accusing protestors of terrorism looks even worse.
 
Just think of it this way Gang. If Ashli had been Brown or Black and standing still with her hands up the MAGA Fanboys would be screaming the cop was afeared for his life.
 
she was a protestor. not a terrorist.
Stop lying.

The people that she was with were building a murder device outside of the capitol building. She, and those she was with, are terrorists.
Yup

accusing protestors of terrorism looks even worse.
Only if it isn't true. In the case of the MAGA terrorists, it's very true.

You sir are shitting on the oath you took when you enlisted.
 
Stop lying.

The people that she was with were building a murder device outside of the capitol building. She, and those she was with, are terrorists.

Only if it isn't true. In the case of the MAGA terrorists, it's very true.

You sir are shitting on the oath you took when you enlisted.
There was no "murdering device" built outside of the Capitol. That gallows was a prop. There was no trap door and it had a sign on it, indicating it was set. It was a symbol, not a functional gallows.
 
Michael Byrd should be charged with violating the civil rights of Ashli Babbitt.

4th Amendment Rights
The Civil Rights Act of 1871, which is codified as 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and commonly known as “Section 1983,” prohibits any person from violating constitutional rights while acting “under the color of law.” In other words, it is unlawful for someone acting in an official governmental capacity to deprive another person of their constitutional rights.
Excessive force is a type of police misconduct where the officer’s actions go beyond the bounds of force that a reasonable officer would use under the same circumstances. These cases focus on the objective reasonableness of the force used – not whether the arrestee was injured. Whether the officer’s use of force was excessive depends largely on the circumstances and facts of each specific case. A judge or jury will weigh the available evidence and applicable laws to determine whether or not the police officer applied a reasonable amount of force.
Her job in the military was to be the person that shoots you if you try to get past a barricade.

No excuses

Too stupid to know better.

Or too high on orange koolade.
 
Byrd used excessive force.
He could have warned her.
He could have pushed her back.
He could have tasered her.
But he chose to shoot her.
I’ll say it again.

Her job in the military was to be the person trying to cross a barricade protecting those she was assigned to protect.

Why do I know you’re ok with suffocating Floyd?
 
Ashley Babbit was breaking and entering. Ashley Babbit failed to comply with the LEO's verbal orders. Ashley Babbit was part of a massive unruly mob that posed a threat. Her behavior got her shot.
She never posed an imminent threat to anyone, which is the correct standard when considering lethal force.
 
Stop lying.

The people that she was with were building a murder device outside of the capitol building. She, and those she was with, are terrorists.

Only if it isn't true. In the case of the MAGA terrorists, it's very true.

You sir are shitting on the oath you took when you enlisted.
Stop lying.
not lying
She, and those she was with, are terrorists.
nope
You sir are shitting on the oath you took when you enlisted.

and you are shitting on every cop that had to face a grand jury in Portland, Ferguson, St Louis during the protests in those and other cities.
 
I have always been a supporter of civil rights.
And the point that I am making is that the Radical Left has a credibility gap on civil rights
For them it depends upon the race of the victim.
Holy Mother of God
 
Well, a lot of the Radical Left still refuse to accept that everyone has civil rights.
Byrd chose to use excessive force over non-deadly actions.
There are conflicting accounts of any verbal warning.
In the video of Bryd shooting the unarmed Babbitt at point blank range there was no verbal warning.

Ashley Babbitt was breaching the final barricade between violent insurrectionists and the Congress people Byrd was sworn to protect.

What "non-deadly actions" do you suggest that would have prevented her and the mob behind from entering?
 
Her job in the military was to be the person that shoots you if you try to get past a barricade.

No excuses

Too stupid to know better.

Or too high on orange koolade.
wow
another crazy left winger who is against the 4th amendment civil right
 
I’ll say it again.

Her job in the military was to be the person trying to cross a barricade protecting those she was assigned to protect.

Why do I know you’re ok with suffocating Floyd?
ok ok
you are against civil rights
got it
 
Holy Mother of God
If Babbitt had been an unarmed Black woman who was shot at point blank range by a White police officer, would that have been a violation of her civil rights?
 
Last edited:
If Babbitt had been an unarmed Black woman who was shot at point blank range by a White police officer, would have been a violation of her civil rights?
Was the white woman breaking into a place?

Are you a white person that feels shit upon? Held down by the man?
 
Ashley Babbitt was breaching the final barricade between violent insurrectionists and the Congress people Byrd was sworn to protect.

What "non-deadly actions" do you suggest that would have prevented her and the mob behind from entering?
he could have warned her
he could have pushed her back
he could have tasered her
but shooting her was excessive force
 
Back
Top Bottom