Officer Byrd violated her civil rights

[Bodecea]

I have yet to see the judges name that tried him.

do you have it?

Byrd wasn't indicted, tried or con-victed. Unlike someone else we know.

 

[JMR]

in that hallway? I have no idea. Were there?

were they pointing guns at Byrd? stabbing at the window with knives? did you see any sign of weapons in the video?

Byrd was protecting elected officials close by, and criminals were breaking windows and forcing entry, in conjunction with a massive attack on the Capitol building. I'm sorry Ashley is dead. I'm sorry she was so lawless that she thought attacking our government on the orders of Trump was how she should be spending her time.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Michael Byrd should be charged with violating the civil rights of Ashli Babbitt.

4th Amendment Rights

Civil Rights Act Section 1983 & Excessive Force by Police

NOTE: This blog article was amended to reflect recent changes to U.S. federal law with passage of the First Step Act (P.L. 115- 391). Since December 21, 2018, the First Step Act required numerous changes to the federal criminal justice […]

www.federalcriminallawyer.us

The Civil Rights Act of 1871, which is codified as 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and commonly known as “Section 1983,” prohibits any person from violating constitutional rights while acting “under the color of law.” In other words, it is unlawful for someone acting in an official governmental capacity to deprive another person of their constitutional rights.
Excessive force is a type of police misconduct where the officer’s actions go beyond the bounds of force that a reasonable officer would use under the same circumstances. These cases focus on the objective reasonableness of the force used – not whether the arrestee was injured. Whether the officer’s use of force was excessive depends largely on the circumstances and facts of each specific case. A judge or jury will weigh the available evidence and applicable laws to determine whether or not the police officer applied a reasonable amount of force.

Captain Byrd did his job on January 6, 2021.

Babbitt was responsible for her death, period.

It’s over and done.

Deal with it.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Ashley Babbit was breaking and entering. Ashley Babbit failed to comply with the LEO's verbal orders. Ashley Babbit was part of a massive unruly mob that posed a threat. Her behavior got her shot.

I hope the jury is wise enough to see through the BS and find for the defendant.

The evidence is all on the government’s side.

Question is now, what will the MAGAt administration try to pull?

 

[Fledermaus]

I understand them far better than you, obviously.

Your posts disprove that.

(I just love seeing people point out my typos. )

So what?

the question still remains, why were there no charges. woman is dead, he fired the weapon that killed her.

Asked and answered. Many times.

That a supposed corrections officer can't understand why is rather sad.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Byrd used excessive force.

Wrong.

He could have warned her.

In uncensored videos of the shooting, Babbitt was repeatedly and very loudly warned by one of her fellow attackers, very loudly “he’s gotta gun!”.

He could have pushed her back.

He could have tasered her.

For all Byrd knew, Babbitt could’ve been carrying a bomb in the backpack she had on.

He had no duty to jeopardize his own safety/life by trying to physically restrain the violent and totally out of control Babbitt.

But he chose to shoot her.

No, Babbitt forced Captain Byrd to shoot her.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Byrd was protecting elected officials close by, and criminals were breaking windows and forcing entry, in conjunction with a massive attack on the Capitol building. I'm sorry Ashley is dead. I'm sorry she was so lawless that she thought attacking our government on the orders of Trump was how she should be spending her time.

Not me. One less traitor stinking up the joint.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Oh, you're veteran.

So are half the people on this board. Do you think that makes you special?

In any case, you've shat all over your service defending insurrectionists and traitors.

Benedict Arnold was a soldier, too.

In any case, you've shat all over your service defending insurrectionists and traitors.

only in the eyes of bloodthirsty partisan hacks.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Byrd wasn't indicted, tried or con-victed. Unlike someone else we know.

Byrd wasn't indicted, tried or con-victed.

he committed murder and got off?

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

If you were either a service member or a correction officer, you'd know that you don't allow a mob into a shelter in place.

You're just mad because your boog got one in the neck instead of killing congressmen or hanging Mike Pence.

boog? are you 9 years old?

if he was the last bastion of defense, why wasn't he armed with more than a handgun.

some that would have stopped her without killing her.


or are you just a bloodthirsty partisan hack.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

It most certainly was....and was very affective. Kudos to Officer Byrd.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Your posts disprove that.



So what?



Asked and answered. Many times.

That a supposed corrections officer can't understand why is rather sad.

"That a supposed corrections officer can't understand why is rather sad."

I've noted my background, what's yours?

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Wrong.

In uncensored videos of the shooting, Babbitt was repeatedly and very loudly warned by one of her fellow attackers, very loudly “he’s gotta gun!”.


For all Byrd knew, Babbitt could’ve been carrying a bomb in the backpack she had on.

He had no duty to jeopardize his own safety/life by trying to physically restrain the violent and totally out of control Babbitt.

No, Babbitt forced Captain Byrd to shoot her.

 

[Jagged]

you miss the point.

Lethal Force is the LAST RESORT.

Him protecting his own life was his first resort.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Him protecting his own life was his first resort.

in her position, she was not a threat. his life was in no danger from her.

 

[Fledermaus]

"That a supposed corrections officer can't understand why is rather sad."

I've noted my background, what's yours?

20+ years military.

And?

This has what bearing on your inability to understand there was no trial because there were no charges? And there were no charges because nothing was done illegally.

 

[Fledermaus]

in her position, she was not a threat. his life was in no danger from her.

You keep forgetting the remainder of the violent insurrectionists.....

Interesting.

Standard response when you are faced with facts.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

20+ years military.

And?

This has what bearing on your inability to understand there was no trial because there were no charges? And there were no charges because nothing was done illegally.

20+ years military.

and you were involved in how many incidents during that time, how many incident reports did you have to fill out?

 

[Fledermaus]

and you were involved in how many incidents during that time, how many incident reports did you have to fill out?

What bearing does this have to do with your inability to understand there was no trial because there were no charges? And there were no charges because nothing was done illegally.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

You keep forgetting the remainder of the violent insurrectionists.....

Interesting.




Standard response when you are faced with facts.

You keep forgetting the remainder of the violent insurrectionists.....

they weren't in the window.

Standard response when you are faced with facts.

standard response because I haven't been on this board long enough to be able to click any emoji but 'like'.

and many of your posts make me sad.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

What bearing does this have to do with your inability to understand there was no trial because there were no charges? And there were no charges because nothing was done illegally.

And there were no charges because nothing was done illegally.

typical response from a bloodthirsty partisan hack.

 

[Fledermaus]

they weren't in the window.


standard response because I haven't been on this board long enough to be able to click any emoji but 'like'.

and many of your posts make me sad.

They weren't in the window because it was occupied by Babbitt.... Until she was shot and the rest of the mob reconsidered their plan of attack.

And dont lie about emojis.

 

[Fledermaus]

typical response from a bloodthirsty partisan hack.

What bearing does this have to do with your inability to understand there was no trial because there were no charges? And there were no charges because nothing was done illegally.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

They weren't in the window because it was occupied by Babbitt.... Until she was shot and the rest of the mob reconsidered their plan of attack.

And dont lie about emojis.

They weren't in the window because it was occupied by Babbitt....

and she was the closest to being an 'imminent' threat. But easily contained by less than lethal force.

And dont lie about emojis.

no need to like. The only reaction emoji available to me is the 'like'.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

What bearing does this have to do with your inability to understand there was no trial because there were no charges? And there were no charges because nothing was done illegally.

you do have comprehension problems, don't you?