Officer Byrd violated her civil rights

[WilHaftaWaite]

You don't know?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

It has been mentioned a few times in this thread.

I have yet to see the judges name that tried him.

do you have it?

 

[Fledermaus]

they were even less 'imminent'.

They were part of the imminent threat.

nope

shooting her at that point was NOT the last resort

Yes. It was. And with one shot the rest of the brave, brave insurrectionists cowered and abandoned the attack.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Yep, and imminent threat resulted in last resort.

she was NOT an imminent threat when she was shot.

 

[Fledermaus]

I have yet to see the judges name that tried him.

do you have it?

What the hell?

There were no trials.

Because there were no charges.

Because people far more understanding of the situation than you determined no laws were broken.

Miss Darwin rolled the dice and came up snake eyes.

 

[Fledermaus]

she was NOT an imminent threat when she was shot.

You OPINION is noted and laughed at on the basis of the definition of imminent and the reality of that day.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

What the hell?

There were no trials.

Because there were no charges.

Because people far more understanding of the situation than you determined no laws were broken.

Miss Darwin rolled the dice and came up snake eyes.

There were no trials.

I noticed

Because there were no charges.

they question is: Why not?

Because people far more understanding of the situation than you determined no laws were broken.

I understand use of force. I have more experience with it then at least 80% of the idiots in Congress that gave him a pass and then a medal.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

definition of imminent

you have no idea of the meaning of 'imminent' in a situation like that.

 

[JMR]

they were even less 'imminent'.

Were any armed?

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Were any armed?

in that hallway? I have no idea. Were there?

were they pointing guns at Byrd? stabbing at the window with knives? did you see any sign of weapons in the video?

 

[Hamish Howl]

Michael Byrd should be charged with violating the civil rights of Ashli Babbitt.

4th Amendment Rights

Civil Rights Act Section 1983 & Excessive Force by Police

NOTE: This blog article was amended to reflect recent changes to U.S. federal law with passage of the First Step Act (P.L. 115- 391). Since December 21, 2018, the First Step Act required numerous changes to the federal criminal justice […]

www.federalcriminallawyer.us

The Civil Rights Act of 1871, which is codified as 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and commonly known as “Section 1983,” prohibits any person from violating constitutional rights while acting “under the color of law.” In other words, it is unlawful for someone acting in an official governmental capacity to deprive another person of their constitutional rights.
Excessive force is a type of police misconduct where the officer’s actions go beyond the bounds of force that a reasonable officer would use under the same circumstances. These cases focus on the objective reasonableness of the force used – not whether the arrestee was injured. Whether the officer’s use of force was excessive depends largely on the circumstances and facts of each specific case. A judge or jury will weigh the available evidence and applicable laws to determine whether or not the police officer applied a reasonable amount of force.

Nobody gives a shit about your dead boog.

Get another traitor. There's no shortage of them.

 

[Hamish Howl]

in that hallway? I have no idea. Were there?

were they pointing guns at Byrd? stabbing at the window with knives? did you see any sign of weapons in the video?

Today I learned that a howling mob is harmless.

You should feel a deep sense of shame for this weird ****ing display.

 

[Fledermaus]

I noticed

they question is: Why not?


I understand use of force. I have more experience with it then at least 80% of the idiots in Congress that gave him a pass and then a medal.

No charges.

Because people far more understanding of the situation than you determined no laws were broken.

And who said anything about Congress?

 

[Hamish Howl]

I understand use of force. I have more experience with it then at least 80% of the idiots in Congress that gave him a pass and then a medal.

Yeah? Explain the source of your particular expertise.

 

[Pyrite]

Babbit's behavior got her killed. Her race was not a factor. You know that. Everyone knows that.

You're arguing that Babitt had a civil right to vandalize, break and enter, and ignore LE orders.

As others have pointed out, it is amazing that more rioters on 1/6 didn't end up just like Babbit.

Post #27

"Babbitt's behavior got her killed."

A fact that MAGA simply doesn't want to accept.

Weren't we taught that we're responsible for the actions we take? Aren't we supposed to help our kids internalize this attitude? So, why is Ashli Babbitt not responsible for her actions on Jan 6?

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Today I learned that a howling mob is harmless.

You should feel a deep sense of shame for this weird ****ing display.

Today I learned that a howling mob is harmless.

nobody here made that claim.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

Yeah? Explain the source of your particular expertise.

20 years military, 10+ years as a corrections officer.

and yours?

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

No charges.

Because people far more understanding of the situation than you determined no laws were broken.

And who said anything about Congress?

 

[Pyrite]

Never said that. I disagree officer Byrd used excessive force. He was responding to a threat and responded in an acceptable way. Office Byrd was under no obligation to allow a rioter to cause him or others bodily harm.

Post #9

Well said. This is a point too many of us, myself included, can forget.

 

[Fledermaus]

10 years as a corrections officer and you understand neither imminent threat nor the limitations of weapons.

And you ask "what trail" when it is clear there were no charges.

Interesting.

 

[Cosmo]

Byrd used excessive force.
He could have warned her.
He could have pushed her back.
He could have tasered her.
But he chose to shoot her.

He could have given her a jury trial as some on the left demand be done to every illegal before anything is done to them.

 

[WilHaftaWaite]

10 years as a corrections officer and you understand neither imminent threat nor the limitations of weapons.

And you ask "what trail" when it is clear there were no charges.

Interesting.

10 years as a corrections officer and you understand neither imminent threat nor the limitations of weapons.

I understand them far better than you, obviously.


(I just love seeing people point out my typos. )

the question still remains, why were there no charges. woman is dead, he fired the weapon that killed her.

 

[Hamish Howl]

20 years military, 10+ years as a corrections officer.

and yours?

Oh, you're veteran.

So are half the people on this board. Do you think that makes you special?

In any case, you've shat all over your service defending insurrectionists and traitors.

Benedict Arnold was a soldier, too.

 

[Hamish Howl]

I understand them far better than you, obviously.


(I just love seeing people point out my typos. )

the question still remains, why were there no charges. woman is dead, he fired the weapon that killed her.

If you were either a service member or a correction officer, you'd know that you don't allow a mob into a shelter in place.

You're just mad because your boog got one in the neck instead of killing congressmen or hanging Mike Pence.

 

[Bodecea]

they were even less 'imminent'.

 

[Bodecea]

nope

shooting her at that point was NOT the last resort

It most certainly was....and was very affective. Kudos to Officer Byrd.