- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Messages
- 24,373
- Reaction score
- 14,951
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I wonder how many votes this will cost her?
Uh-huh. Which is why when they had 60 votes in the senate, all of them full fledged communists and socialists, they passed a rabidly partisan healthcare bill based around a single payer system... er... public option... er.... a watered down rework of what republicans proposed in the 90's...
That's right, a congress full of socialists and the best they could do is pass a rehashed version of a republican proposal.
You're argument is more of a convoluted rant then anything else.
Methinks she just had her 15 mintes of fame. By this time next week, more than likely, we'll hardly hear of her again.
We'll see.
Some lost but some gained is also possible. When Maddow played it on MSNBC and was laughing her ass off, it made Rachel look like a jerk, and O'Donnell a nice wholesome God loving Christian. People may be getting tired of Christianity being the butt of jokes. They may not kill you for it, but it may be enough to get them to the polls in Nov.
I think O'Donnell should run it herself and say "look what they're showing all over the internet and cable news to attack me. I guess they couldn't find the porn film of me."
Sorry, I'll miss it. I don't get HBO. Oh well, I imagine MSNBC will play a clip. I'll catch it then.If you thought Maddow was bad, wait until Bill Maher's show tonight. I really can't wait :mrgreen: I imagine I'm going to be laughing my ass off.
Sorry, I'll miss it. I don't get HBO. Oh well, I imagine MSNBC will play a clip. I'll catch it then.
It was a congress full of socialists and the best they could do is pass legislation making people responsible for buying their own private health insurance... that's no where near "socialist". You'd understand that if you didn't let the talking points cloud your vision.ROTFLOL... that is a gut splitter my friend. You walked into that one face first.
That they passed any Socialist healthcare program illustrates they are shades of socialists, and doing it without reading the bill smacks of the Duma, not the US Congress.
.
Here's your problem, you view all democrats as the same. And even worse you think other people do as well.
sort of like many on this board thinking everyone in the top 1% of taxpayers are robber-barons
If you thought Maddow was bad, wait until Bill Maher's show tonight. I really can't wait :mrgreen: I imagine I'm going to be laughing my ass off.
sort of like many on this board thinking everyone in the top 1% of taxpayers are robber-barons
its great that Maher is identified with the left
its hard to think of a more arrogant elitist than that ass and unlike COulter who was phi beta kappa at cornell, that schmuck wasn't exactly setting the curve there.
top 1% of taxpayers are robber-barons ≠ top 1% of tax payers can afford a small tax increase
Having people buying insurance from private insurance firms is not socialist no matter how you spin it.ROTFLOL... that is a gut splitter my friend. You walked into that one face first.
That they passed any Socialist healthcare program illustrates they are shades of socialists, and doing it without reading the bill smacks of the Duma, not the US Congress.
.
It was a congress full of socialists and the best they could do is pass legislation making people responsible for buying their own private health insurance... that's no where near "socialist". You'd understand that if you didn't let the talking points cloud your vision.
It ain't "having" it's forcing. I don't recall the Constitution giving that authority to force the public to buy something.Having people buying insurance from private insurance firms is not socialist no matter how you spin it.
End result?
Win - Lose.
By how many?
You make the call.
This is as much about tracking the race as predicting the outcome.
Dems... Nervous?
ROTFLOL...
Here is the killer...
Now, do they send another Marxist to DC, or someone hell bent on undoing the damage done?
.
LOL... nice try.
They force people to buy something they can do without or be self insured... that's socialist, and wait... they've opened the door for something bigger and better; it's how the socialists operate.
It ain't "having" it's forcing. I don't recall the Constitution giving that authority to force the public to buy something.
We hope you continue with Carter Disease until Nov. 3.
Having people buying insurance from private insurance firms is not socialist no matter how you spin it.
Having people buying insurance from private insurance firms is not socialist no matter how you spin it.
TurtleDude said:forcing people to buy insurance violates the tenth amendment
Not full sureity, but 94% sureity...
Primaries are also a lot more volatile and unpredictable than general elections.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?