Sixty-three percent (63%) of Delaware voters are at least somewhat angry with the policies of the federal government, which is in line with results found nationally.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ctions/delaware/election_2010_delaware_senate
Now, do they send another Marxist to DC, or someone hell bent on undoing the damage done?
End result?
Win - Lose.
By how many?
You make the call.
This is as much about tracking the race as predicting the outcome.
Dems... Nervous?
ROTFLOL...
Here is the killer...
Now, do they send another Marxist to DC, or someone hell bent on undoing the damage done?
.
Election 2010: Delaware Senate
Delaware Senate: Coons (D) 53%, O’Donnell (R) 42%
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Election 2010: Delaware Senate - Rasmussen Reports™
Here's your problem, you view all democrats as the same. And even worse you think other people do as well.
Stink bait?I don't care much for stinkbait, but tnx 4 d offa.
I chose the one closest to " She's going to clobber him."
Uh-huh. Which is why when they had 60 votes in the senate, all of them full fledged communists and socialists, they passed a rabidly partisan healthcare bill based around a single payer system... er... public option... er.... a watered down rework of what republicans proposed in the 90's...Show me the conservative wing of the Democrat party. There ain't one.
Do I get to choose your avatar for you if I win?
These options are way too narrow... there's like an 80% chance of the bottom one, and a 20% chance of all the rest of them combined.
These options are way too narrow... there's like an 80% chance of the bottom one, and a 20% chance of all the rest of them combined.
Huh? Write what as a superposition of what?
Psssssssssst... check their voting records.
Look what they did to Lieberman... the ONE that strayed.
Blue Dawgs? Where I ask? Check the ObiKare vote.
Show me the conservative wing of the Democrat party. There ain't one.
Stink bait?
I'm curious to see what people think.
You seem nervous... BTW the poll is secret, so nobody will know how wrong you might be.
O'Donnell by 2%.
.
:shrug: she was also guaranteed to lose the primary.
there was no way Scott Brown was going to win in Mass.
Mark Rubio is a fool for thinking he could take on a sitting governor in a primary.
Rand Paul is way too far right to ever be elected.....
and so on and so forth.
ANYONE claiming sureity in the failure of anti-incumbent / anti-establishment style candidates this year is either a fool, or whistling in the dark.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?