- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 15,633
- Reaction score
- 6,159
- Location
- Behind the Orange Curtain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Yeah, so feminine...
By the way, since you apparently have never met a gay person, hint: they dress just like every one else.
Other than PC, what possible reason could there be for unisex clothing? What is discriminatory about male uniforms and female uniforms?
According to a 2008 Army focus group report, “unisex” combat uniforms designed for men fit many women badly in the shoulders, bust, hips and crotch and left many buying larger sizes.
The Army designed a solution and had 400 active-duty and 200 National Guard and Reserve female soldiers fit-test the line in 2011.
Eighty-six percent said the coat fit better and 71 percent said the trousers fit better, Maj. Laverne Stanley, the assistant product manager of soldier clothing and individual equipment, said in a statement.
Other than PC, what possible reason could there be for unisex clothing? What is discriminatory about male uniforms and female uniforms?
By the way, since you apparently have never met a gay person, hint: they dress just like every one else.
Oh, and I almost missed this: it is an alternate uniform, with soldiers being allowed to wear the old ACU. So this is much ado about jack ****.
You were quick Redress to start lerking after me after my hiatus.
I've lived in the land of fruits and nuts since 1953, I'm pretty sure I have met more than a few fags. Actually I never met a gay that I didn't like as an individual. I always found the fairy type as being funny and entertaining, just like you.
This thread is about the liberal Obama administration social engineering of the U.S. military and going as far as feminizing the combat uniform of American soldiers and Marines in the name of diversity.
Back in 1942 the USMC came up with the best combat utility uniform ever developed by any country, It was plain and simple, loose fitting and comfortable while you were killing the enemy. It was the Herringbone utility uniform. It was the basic uniform until a liberal known as Robert McNamara would order all soldiers, Marines, etc. to wear the same uniform that was uncomfortable, didn't breath but looked cool on the parade field. Don't even want to get into the Vietnam era jungle fatigues that you sweat in and didn't breath.
Have you ever wonder why Marines and soldiers never wore underwear in Vietnam ?
GOING COMMANDO
LOL, are you sure you were in the military? You wear whatever you're told to wear by your unit. Did you really think one guy could go pick his uniform out? If everyone is wearing unisex, he will too. There is absolutely zero reason for this other than PC. If you can come up with one, I'd like to hear it.
I don't care whose fault it is, Obama's, Bush's, or Abraham Lincoln's. A unisex uniform is an abomination and it shouldn't exist.
You were quick Redress to start lerking after me after my hiatus.
I've lived in the land of fruits and nuts since 1953, I'm pretty sure I have met more than a few fags. Actually I never met a gay that I didn't like as an individual. I always found the fairy type as being funny and entertaining, just like you.
This thread is about the liberal Obama administration social engineering of the U.S. military and going as far as feminizing the combat uniform of American soldiers and Marines in the name of diversity.
Back in 1942 the USMC came up with the best combat utility uniform ever developed by any country, It was plain and simple, loose fitting and comfortable while you were killing the enemy. It was the Herringbone utility uniform. It was the basic uniform until a liberal known as Robert McNamara would order all soldiers, Marines, etc. to wear the same uniform that was uncomfortable, didn't breath but looked cool on the parade field. Don't even want to get into the Vietnam era jungle fatigues that you sweat in and didn't breath.
Have you ever wonder why Marines and soldiers never wore underwear in Vietnam ?GOING COMMANDO
Brings whole new meaning to jungle rot.
Well, maybe you should have read the ****ing article since it explained it. It came about due to poor fit of the old ACUs.
And I was in the navy, where we were assumed to be able to think to a point of determining which uniform was appropriate for the situation.
Is there anyone who can't explain why the name tags would be raised so high ? PC to the extreme.
My cousin got a bad case of jungle rot while serving in Vietnam. It looked very painful.Either you know what your talking about Moot or you know someone who has been there and done that.
Jungle rot !
I knew a few Vietnam vets who continued to wear their fatiques after they came home from the war. A lot of vets did. They looked comfortable enough and seemed to like wearing them for street wear.The old herringbone utilities were 100 % cotton. They breathed but they rotted quickly in the humid tropics and they ripped easily in the field. But they were comfortable. They were baggy, loose fitting.
In Vietnam they came up with the jungle fatigues / utilities that were beagy but were synthetic/cotton material that didn't rip or rot as quickly but didn't breath and were very uncomfortable and you sweated while wearing them.
I'm surprised because Gays usually have good taste in attire.Nothing has changed since Vietnam. Civilians within the Department of Defense have ignored the Marines and soldiers who actually have to fight. We have seen stupid camouflage pattern to wearing berets and the U.S, Army no longer has a service uniform. There are third world country armies who are bettered dressed than the U.S. Army today. Look at what the liberal civilians who never served in combat are proposing.
The picture of the 1945 Marine uniform that you posted...was orginally designed to go "over" the service uniform like coveralls. Thats the reason they were baggier. It wasn't by design that the troops just started wearing them without their service uniforms underneath, it just sort of happened as a matter of convenience.If you look at this PC combat uniform, it's not beagy enough, It's too tight fitting. It's not practical in a combat environment.
Maybe too many complained that the name tag rubbed on their pierced nipples. lol jk But if moving the nametag up so it doesn't look like a pasty then I guess that makes me PC to the extreme, too. Although I don't think so.What really exposes it being a political correctness move is raising the nametag high above the breast pocket. The libs were yelling that the Plt. Cmdrs. and or Co. CO's were not looking at the name tags of the female members of their unitis but looking at their breast !!!
Is there anyone who can't explain why the name tags would be raised so high ? PC to the extreme.
How does making a unisex uniform more feminine help men fit in their clothes better? And no, you NEVER answered why a unisex uniform should exist in the first place. If the women are having a hard time fitting in their clothes, change their clothes. Screwing around with some ridiculous bastardized unisex uniform is good for nobody. It's a PC ploy, and you've done nothing to prove otherwise. Where's the need?Well, maybe you should have read the ****ing article since it explained it. It came about due to poor fit of the old ACUs.
And I was in the navy, where we were assumed to be able to think to a point of determining which uniform was appropriate for the situation.
That's right, Obama's administration in the name of diversity, aka liberal social engineering of the U.S. military will be forcing American male warriors to wear gay famine clothing into combat.
>" A new combat uniform with special consideration to the female body is now available at Fort Gordon, almost a month after the Army announced plans to open all units and military jobs to women by 2016.
The March debut of the Combat Uniform-Alternate is the first in a series of moves the Army hopes to make in the next three years to help female soldiers feel like more professional members, officials said.
With narrower shoulders, a slightly tapered waist and a more spacious seat, the unisex clothing line has been in the works since 2009 and is being issued to all installations – ..."< -> Unisex Uniforms Debut As Army Opens Units To Women « CBS Atlanta
Note: Obama's PC Dept. of Defense already convinced Congress to order all Marines, soldiers, sailors and airmen to wear the same combat/utilities uniforms.
Now all Marines, soldiers, sailors and airmen will be required (forced/ordered) to ware famine/gay field uniforms.
Side Drift: Has the U.S. Army removed those signs that state "Through these doors pass the best dressed soldiers in the world" ??? The U.S. Army no longer has a service uniform !!! American Army soldiers are seen at airports wearing combat uniforms like third world African soldiers.
The U.S. Army doesn't even have a service uniform any more !
How does making a unisex uniform more feminine help men fit in their clothes better?
again, it's the current uniform that's unisexAnd no, you NEVER answered why a unisex uniform should exist in the first place.
That's what's being done and you're complaining about it.If the women are having a hard time fitting in their clothes, change their clothes.
It sounds like they will be given a choice between regular clothing and the gay-famine clothing.That's right, Obama's administration in the name of diversity, aka liberal social engineering of the U.S. military will be forcing American male warriors to wear gay famine clothing into combat.
If the Army is giving its folks the choice not to wear the clothes of starving homosexuals, why aren't the other forces giving their crews the same choice.Note: Obama's PC Dept. of Defense already convinced Congress to order all Marines, soldiers, sailors and airmen to wear the same combat/utilities uniforms.
Now all Marines, soldiers, sailors and airmen will be required (forced/ordered) to ware famine/gay field uniforms.
United States Army Service UniformThe U.S. Army doesn't even have a service uniform any more !
You were quick Redress to start lerking after me after my hiatus.
I've lived in the land of fruits and nuts since 1953, I'm pretty sure I have met more than a few fags. Actually I never met a gay that I didn't like as an individual. I always found the fairy type as being funny and entertaining, just like you.
This thread is about the liberal Obama administration social engineering of the U.S. military and going as far as feminizing the combat uniform of American soldiers and Marines in the name of diversity.
Back in 1942 the USMC came up with the best combat utility uniform ever developed by any country, It was plain and simple, loose fitting and comfortable while you were killing the enemy. It was the Herringbone utility uniform. It was the basic uniform until a liberal known as Robert McNamara would order all soldiers, Marines, etc. to wear the same uniform that was uncomfortable, didn't breath but looked cool on the parade field. Don't even want to get into the Vietnam era jungle fatigues that you sweat in and didn't breath.
Have you ever wonder why Marines and soldiers never wore underwear in Vietnam ?
GOING COMMANDO
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?