- Joined
- Mar 16, 2009
- Messages
- 47,483
- Reaction score
- 53,188
- Location
- Dixie
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Like I already said, read what I wrote. But then again, there are no pictures so I guess it is too difficult for you. Here, allow me to assist you. If you need me to draw up a graph just PM me.
Where do criminals get guns?
The same place law abiding citizens do.
Law abiding citizens are indistinguishable from people buying guns for the purposes of selling to criminals.
If registration existed, the "gun traffickers" would not be able to peddle guns to criminals.
It's that simple.
Actually it isn't.
For starters, there's the 250 to 300 million guns already in circulation, most of which are not registered. For a glimpse at how many would be registered, we can look at Canada's failed attempt to register guns. Probably less than 15%.
Then there's other ways; listing guns as "lost" or "stolen". Stealing guns from the rightful owners, a popular means already; smuggling guns in over the borders, just as drugs are smuggled.
The fact that a firearm is registered would not deter a crazy person, just as "no gun school zones" don't deter them now. The wide availability of unregistered firearms already in circulation would serve criminals well for at least a century, and bear in mind how unsuccessful we've been in preventing drug smuggling: gun smuggling would be about as easy. Getting unregistered guns to commit armed robberies or murders with would not be hard at all.
Historically, registration has often lead to confiscation in many countries. In California, registration lead to broad classes of firearms being banned.
To infringe on a fundamental right, you need to show a compelling state intrest, and demonstrate that it would serve a useful purpose without being burdensome to the law-abiding. No such compelling intrest has been shown; the usefulness is highly debateable; the potential for registration being used in later bans is burdensome to the law-abiding.
Registration does not pass the strict test for Constitutionality.