- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 160,900
- Reaction score
- 57,844
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
quote?
op...
quote?
I guess that defending the 2nd requires mounting an assault on the 1st.
Great timing too, NRA.
op...
Me thinks you underestimate the power of the tweetSome people care about Twitter slap fights...some people don't.
Moving on...
Pure genius. You have ripped away the medical profession’s facade of actually caring about people being injured and dying from gunshot wounds. Scotland Yard may soon call on you.Doctors are desperate to divert from the fact that for deaths caused by humans in the USA, THEY are THE #1 cause of death in the USA. #1 & #2 are cancer and heart disease. #3 are medical mistakes - over 250,000 a year.
Doctors wrongly KILL more people than any other group - at least 5 times more than even auto accidents. DOCTORS ARE KILLERS - the #1 HUMAN KILLERS - in the USA. OF COURSE they want to divert attention to firearm deaths, most of which are suicides that would happen anyway without any guns.
The same day 12 people were shot by a lunatic, doctors killed nearly 1000 people. Doctors kill far more people in a week than were killed in the 9/11 attack. Doctors kill more people PER DAY than in every domestic and foreign terror attack in the USA combined over the last 10 years. But don't expect to hear a word of it in the press or MSM.
So, then why post in an NRA thread if you are going to play "neutral"?
What makes you think that if someone's stance is neutral, that means he can't post in an NRA thread?
Read the conversation; draw your own conclusion.
Or how about you stop being a weasel and answer a simple question.
What question?
What makes you think that if someone's stance is neutral, that means he can't post in an NRA thread?
I didn't say he can't. I asked why he would.
So you did not outright state he couldn't, but instead you asked why he would. Ok, then I will simply ask you, why do you sound like you are suggesting one needs to have something other than a neutral stance in order to participate in an NRA thread?
I asked you to read the conversation for a reason.
And its because you could not answer my question.
Just a weasel being his usual weasel self. Got it.
So, you don't want to answer your own question by reading it. OK.
What's the point of asking a question with the aim of answering it myself? Usually when people ask a question, it's directed at other people.
Well, since the answer is there in the conversation
I guess that defending the 2nd requires mounting an assault on the 1st.
Great timing too, NRA.
The NRA is actually very damaging to the 2A also. Throughout history, they've been complicit in a lot of the gun control measures at both national and state levels. If you want to see what a real group that supports the 2A looks like, check out GOA or JPFO.
Both groups are far less political and probably more sincere.
Do you have any idea how many bullets I pull out of corpses weekly? This isn’t just my lane. It’s my ****ing highway.
https://twitter.com/drjudymelinek/status/1060912988532629504