teacher said:
Maybe you just weren't getting the job done. We each have our own style, DC, I've read you, now go follow my links in this thread. Kind of ugly. But they get to the true heart of the matter, don't they? We are on the same side DC. On this one. Little hint for you...when dealing with a so-called, "Peaceful Muslims", just ask then to support the targetting of Jewish children with bombs. They ALWAYS run. Your mealy mouth "I just want to get to the heart of the matter and understand you" tactics just gives them a platform to post their weak azz rhetoric. Call them on their bullshit. I did. Seen PeacefulMuslim lately? Hey Peaceful, can't deal with the insults? Fine, get over it, I'll rack you. Just tells me you ain't got conviction. I watched this thread for a while DC. I really did. It was going nowhere. This is not "your" thread. If you have the stones you can go start one somewhere and own it. If you're good. MOTT and Brigand are now toast. You didn't do that. I'm still here to argue my point. They are not. Who wins?
You have the PM tool.
Don't be whining when others join the fray.
I want the “Peaceful” Muslims to “post their weak azz rhetoric,” because if there is a peaceful Muslim out there they need the embarrassment if they don‘t show up to correct their brothers and sisters. They define Islam for us.
“Top Ten things about Arabs that are good/no good.” (teacher)
teacher [sic] you might as well just call them sand ******s and be done with it, and I am trying to keep from being like that, so I guess that means we are not on the same side.
I have never used the PM tool on any message board, as I found out when they first started it on a liberal’s message board the “liberals” were using it to talk behind others backs and to coordinate a response, so I don‘t think it is polite.
The Muslim and “liberal” hypocrites will certainly run away. Back in August 2001 I started a topic called “colored forum” in the religious forum of a liberal newspaper’s message board, where I argued with the webmaster of that message board to be able to quote religious texts in a thread started by a Muslim with the word “Taliban” in the title. It was kind of impossible to discuss the actions of the Taliban without discussing Islam. And I invited the Muslim defender of the Taliban to post there. The Muslim then started a new topic called "new colored forum please," so I have no reason to believe that the trolls will go to a topic where you or I own it.
I also had a topic once called “mischief-makers” in which I quoted the Koran and specifically asked for only Muslims to respond to whether the 911 attacks qualified as mischief in the land, and every time a Muslim showed up on the message board to troll for “liberal” sympathy I linked to the topic. I NEVER got a response to the “mischief-makers” thread except from “liberals“ that attempted to answer for Muslims, and the irony is that the very first “liberal” to respond to that thread agreed with the “liberal” answering these questions:
“ 2). Why not go on record as to whether you agree with your ‘liberal‘ comrade that Osama is ‘playing by the rules of warfare?’ What about Hamas and other terrorist groups?
This one, believe it or not is fairly straight forward... Terrorist groups fight with the weapons they have available... Hamas and other groups don't have airplanes, tanks and the like to fight the Israelis... So they use the only weapons avaiable to them.... The problem I have is the killing of innocent people... If they want to blow up the Israeli military.. GO FOR IT!!”
http://www.news-journalonline.com/forum/Forum3/HTML/001079.html
Over a three year period only one liberal responded to the above “Liberals!” thread to condemn the idea that terrorists are “playing by the rules of warfare,” and he was an educated African American. I linked to that thread hundreds of times. I juxtaposed our troops with Israelis, when the “liberal” democrat said “GO FOR IT,” and as always the “liberals” show their hypocrisy in support of the troops, in a just war, in support of United Nations (of tyrants too) troops, when they care. The “liberals” would create a set of rules of warfare that contains a codex (a book that would reach the stars) of when and where the rules apply according to their unorthodox logic. So in my opinion “liberals,“ which are not to be confused with liberals (those that will not defend “liberals”), are just too hypocritically stupid to debate; like vampires the hypocrites have no reflection, and they die in the light.
I can start a topic:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=58573&postcount=1
But, in the end the “liberals” always run, or the “liberals“ fall back on the unorthodox illogical argument that is most common among the unwashed; since they think, therefore it must be true!
I could show you hundreds of shrunken “liberal” heads in topics I have started if I could link to those that have not been destroyed. If I hadn’t misplaced a few disks during the hurricanes I could even quote many topics that I kept for future reference of ignorant “liberals.” A funny thing happened once, the “Liberals” topic on the liberal message board was corrupted, and the only good response from the educated black man (Named “Finisher“) was lifted from the middle of page three to be put as the first post to the topic, I did not buy that it was an act of G-d.
Here are some links to the principalities and powers of the air:
"new colored forum please"
“mischiefmakers?”
New MAD Policy
That mushroom cloud got one response and actually survived in a cache, for a while, but after that link went down I started a new one:
http://forums.prospero.com/ti-os/messages?msg=14601.1
I got the same level of response, but that message board doesn‘t have many members, and I left because I don‘t like the format.
There is simply no reason to believe that a “Peaceful” Muslim will respond to a topic that I own, and since I do not own this message board I do not own any topic.
I am just here to have my idea of fun, and I see no reason to go to the basement with an insult that I would rather have everyone see.
Now, as any teacher should know, I could have been calling the ones that got banned children, but someone must have been feeling guilty.