your claim: "they get free healthcare for life".
please provide evidence that all Iraq & Afghan War vets qualify for free healthcare for life.
thanks bro.
Thunder, et al,
This is complicate.
(COMMENT)
I live in Columbus, Ohio. I am Retired Army with a Service Connected VA Disability Rating of 60%. At Wright-Patterson AFB Dayton, I was turned away. But I do get treatment at the local VAOPC in Columbus. So far, I have not been charge a single thing in over 20 years of retirement; and I have had some extensive hospitalizations.
Having said that, the VA always asks for my private insurance. I don't know the particulars, but I think there is some sort of billing arrangement between the VA and my private carrier. When I came back from the Persian Gulf, I was having serious issues and the VA fixed me right up, after 3 weeks in Mount Carmel East Medical Center. I did not receive any billing.
I don't exactly know how it all works. I just know what I have experienced.
Most Respectfully,
R
And conservatives just make money off them....THEN toss them into homelessness yuphow about sating the truth that NIETHER party is giving a dAmn about us. At least OBAMA is spending more money on VA. Not near enough but more than Bush who used us up for their financial gain.
At 60% most of medical would be paid for. There is a charge but Ive noticed the VA justnot sending the bill to servicemembers. I just ignored them until they stopped sending them
Yeah... after smiting Hitler sure... after Afghanistan? Doubtful.
Troops' sacrifice should be respected... but Iraq wasn't a legit war. :shrug:
Neither was Vietnam right? So a man gets killed in Iraq, and you say **** him....it wasn't legitimate. Got it!
Yeah... after smiting Hitler sure... after Afghanistan? Doubtful.
Troops' sacrifice should be respected... but Iraq wasn't a legit war. :shrug:
Neither was Vietnam right? So a man gets killed in Iraq, and you say **** him....it wasn't legitimate. Got it!
Public Law 107-243 said:
Divided War Powers: The President & the Congress said:On August 7, 1964, Congress approved what is known as the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, supporting "all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression."
SOURCE: Teachable Moment -
Weird, Ive never seen anyone given any **** for being in uniform anywhere.
And for that many people to do that in one place.
That is just absolutely heartbreaking. I remember these type of events from the Vietnam era but I had no idea that these alleged humans were conducting themselves this way in modern times.
It won't make up for this but:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE
That's ****ed up! It sucks when history repeats itself like this.
American, MKULTRABOY, et al,
Well, the assumption and comparison of the legitimacy status between Vietnam (one set of laws) and Iraq (a completely different set of laws) is incorrect. (Apples & Oranges)
(COMMENT)
It is actually a slight of hand. Congress, for all intent and purposes, pre-authorized the conflict. Congress abdicated its responsibility and handed it to The President. The war in Iraq is 100% Legitimate by Public Law, an act of Congress.
In Vietnam, President Johnson used the "Gulf of Tonkin" Resolution (August 7, 1964) to justify his authority. The laws were different then and the Power of the Presidency was different.
Most Respectfully,
R
Neither have I. Nor have I read any stories in the paper about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?