- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 15,910
- Reaction score
- 12,630
- Location
- Plano, Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
Whats apparent to me...its not the liberals going after cain...they want him to win....its the conservatives want him out..
How is that at all apparent? Because this one lady was identified as a conservative by her liberal attorney?
No tess...because the obama camp wants herman cain to win the primary..Obama will destroy him in debates...
Do you honestly think there is a liberal out there who wouldn't want Herman Cain to run?Maybe. Then again, Obama's not polling so well these days in comparison to where he was during the election of '08. He's not the same untarnished star that he was before.
Yes your right...she cant possibly be telling the truth against Arch Angel Herman...
Maybe. Then again, Obama's not polling so well these days in comparison to where he was during the election of '08. He's not the same untarnished star that he was before.
Do you honestly think there is a liberal out there who wouldn't want Herman Cain to run?
Thats true tess...but Obama was up against Hillary whos no dull blade and McCain a very experienced debater who is very knowledgeable about washington and Foreign Policy...and obama beat them.
Cain is a moron when it comes to politics and dangerously dumb when it comes to foreign policy...obama will make him look like a smacked arse....Cain is living proof business experience means squat when you know nothing else.
Has anything at all been proven yet? Sounds like all we have is allegations.
I don't think liberals have put their eggs in any basket just yet. Most of the GOP candidates are great from my perspective for the Democrats, so I can't see them doing too much work to support or destroy any of the candidates.I'm not sure, to be honest. If the liberals were really anxious to guarantee a win in 2012 I would have thought they'd work harder to get somebody like Santorum or Bachmann through the primaries. America's attention span is short, so it seems risky to put all the eggs in Cain's basket, assuming he'd be soundly beaten on the basis of today's big scandalous headline.
I'm not sure, to be honest. If the liberals were really anxious to guarantee a win in 2012 I would have thought they'd work harder to get somebody like Santorum or Bachmann through the primaries. America's attention span is short, so it seems risky to put all the eggs in Cain's basket, assuming he'd be soundly beaten on the basis of today's big scandalous headline.
Has anything at all been proven yet? Sounds like all we have is allegations.
Romney is definitely Obama's greatest threat which is why it's dumbfounding to me that he isn't the clear pick yet. But even so, I don't think Romney beating Obama is even close to a sure thing. It would be incredibly easy to discredit Romney by portraying him as a loose cannon who people can't trust to do what he says he will do. It's also easy to portray him as too liberal for what he claims to be. Even further, Obama has experience as president, foreign policy and a focus on jobs going for him. And although Romney's focus on spending works to a certain extent, I think most Americans click more with jobs than spending.There isnt enough hard work in the universe that could get either bachman or santorum through the primary...but your right the obama camp would be dancing in the street if either of them run....trust obamas greatest fear is romney...who will beat him if he gets past the primary.
I thought in order to be sexual harassment, the accuser has to be employed by the accusee? This woman didn't even work for him at the time he allegedly made a move on her? How is that sexual harassment and not just a clumsy sexual advance after she called him to meet at a hotel?
Part of the problem I have with a woman coming out of the woodworks now is that, barring a confession from Cain, it cannot be proven. All it is, is a political hit with no merit.Sexual harassment, is intimidation, bullying or coercion of a sexual nature, or the unwelcome or inappropriate promise of rewards in exchange for sexual favors.
Having said that.... this of course cannot be considered workplace sexual harrassment because she wasnt working with or for Cain..... but his comment, if true, about "ya want a job, right?" implies the promise of reward. Doubt anything legal should have been or can be now done, but if proven true, it definitely goes to his character.
As far as Gloria Allred goes...shes a man hater and so totally politically movitivated its pathetic (she wasnt so much the man hater when it came to all those women who accused Clinton, she wanted nothing to do with those women), but that doesnt change the fact that this, if proven true, goes to his character. You can say all you want about her or about the reasons that these charges by all these women were brought forward now.... but if they are proven true, it doesnt make Cain any less of a pervert or an asshole.
Part of the problem I have with a woman coming out of the woodworks now is that, barring a confession from Cain, it cannot be proven. All it is, is a political hit with no merit.
A new woman alleging sexual harassment by presidential hopeful Herman Cain will break her silence at a news conference with her powerhouse attorney Gloria Allred Monday afternoon in New York City, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.
The embattled GOP nominee has admitted that several women who worked at the National Restaurant Association during his tenure as president of the organization received settlements. Politico has reported that the settlements were given because of sexual harassment allegations.
Herman turning out to be a real Ho :lamo:lamo:lamo
New Woman Accusing Herman Cain Of Sexual Harassment Hires Gloria Allred | Radar Online
Isn't Allred the lawyer who sued the boyscouts because they wouldn't let a girl in? I kinda think she is just an over the top liberal feminist. I have a hard time taking her too seriously. At any rate, if Cain did try to rape this woman, all he has to do is switch parties and he's fine. In fact, that gives him Democrat street cred.
He didnt try to rape her. By her own admission.... he put a hand up her skirt and tried to push her head toward his crotch...she told him no...he stopped IMMEDIATELY and took her back to her hotel. You can call him a pervert.. a cheater if he was married.. an ass... but that isnt rape.
He didnt try to rape her. By her own admission.... he put a hand up her skirt and tried to push her head toward his crotch...she told him no...he stopped IMMEDIATELY and took her back to her hotel. You can call him a pervert.. a cheater if he was married.. an ass... but that isnt rape.
heh...its SEXUAL HARASSMENT is what it is...hey that would be great fun for all guys if we could just run around sticking our hands up any gals skirt we want and grabbing her behind the head and pushing it down to our crotch...then just stop if they say so and everything is just cool beans....ARE YOU KIDDING ME lol
I'm sure we'll find out as much from this one as we have from that last three, which would be, nada.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?