Orion said:
"Here was my bill: $0 ... The cost of the ambulance, IVs, medications, a bed in the ER, and the attention of a nurse and an on call physician was nothing."
Here is my main concern with the OP. While his bill may have been $0, the cost of all those things was much greater. Some of the cost was covered by the OPs taxes, the rest by the taxes of others. Simply dividing the cost of medical services amongst the entire population doesn't make the services cost any less. I'll grant that tucked into most legislation creating government single payer health insurance are price controls (or similar) on those things but none of that is inherent to government as single payer health insurance.
So for everyone who wants to use this as a system vs. system anecdote ...
1) What is the actual cost of an ambulance trip in Canada? In the US? Why the difference?
2) What is the actual cost of food poisoning meds in Canada? In the US? Why the difference?
3) What is the actual cost of an ER bed in Canada? In the US? Why the difference?
4) What is the actual cost of nurse time in Canada? In the US? Why the difference?
5) What is the actual cost of physician time in Canada? In the US? Why the difference?
I'll grant that 2, 4, and 5 are probably more expensive in the US. 2, due to stupid pharmaceutical exporting tricks (can be resolved independently of government as single payer health insurer). 4 and 5, simply because they are paid more per hour in the US (again, could be resolved independently of single payer health insurer). 1 and 3 are likely to be the same. For everyone who will point out that the OP doesn't have to pay insurance premiums, I'll add ...
6) What is the average Canadian tax outlay for health care? What is the average insurance premium in the US?
Furthermore, if the US were to move towards a more free-market approach to health care services. The cost of medication, physician services, and nursing services, will decrease due to competition; as seen in every other US professional service industry.
Kernel Sanders said:
"Really? If a drunk driver hit you and forced you to get a heart transplant, you could pay for that yourself in cash?"
False Dichotomy. "Providing for your own health care needs" includes buying health insurance. Proper health insurance would cover the unexpected / accidental need for a heart transplant, just as proper auto insurance covers the unexpected / accidental need for car repair (but not oil changes, regular maintenance, etc.)
Kernel Sanders said:
"Right out of college while looking for a job my sister's insurance cost $400/month. She obviously couldn't afford that and fortunately my parents could. Had she not had that support network, what do you think she should have done? How could she possibly have handled unforseen, impossible to avoid health problems at that point?"
The quoted figure is not for 'emergency only' health insurance (like auto insurance), which would be significantly cheaper. Reforming the US system towards a more free-market approach would allow for such insurance. Additionally I'm not sure why it's obvious she couldn't afford the $400 a month? Was she living hand to mouth with no luxuries to give up? Since she did have a support network, why do you assume other people do not?
J