• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

My thoughts exactly

Teatime said:
Mhmm so then since no woman "needs" a pregnancy we can go ahead and mandate abortion, according to you.
Click to expand...

I'm all for fewer people...go for it 😁

Let's see your legal foundation so I can prepare my brief.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Teatime said:
No, not both parents. The father has no say.
Click to expand...

In circumcision? That is incorrect.

www.weinbergerlawgroup.com

When Parents Disagree on Circumcision

To circumcise or not to circumcise your son is a personal decision between you and your child’s other parent. There are extreme views on both sides of this issue and parents who choose to circumcise their children do so for a myriad of reasons including religion, tradition and hygiene. But, what...
www.weinbergerlawgroup.com www.weinbergerlawgroup.com

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Teatime said:
Just don't be surprised when boys who's body was permanently modified by a woman think it's ok to control women's bodies in turn.
Click to expand...
Rough childhood, eh?
 
bongsaway said:
If you're a male and by forty you don't understand you are a nobody, you have a long tough swim upstream.
Click to expand...

replacing "male" with "human", it is still just as true.
 
Teatime said:
I'm pro-choice and public policy is everyone's business.
Click to expand...
Knowing the reason a woman has an abortion or not is not public policy.
 
bongsaway said:
If you're a male and by forty you don't understand you are a nobody, you have a long tough swim upstream.
Click to expand...
Why are we a nobody?
 
Teatime said:
It is. You can be mad about it, it changes nothing.
Click to expand...

No, it isn't. I have to assume if you had a valid argument, you would be proving it now instead of getting emotional about it... *shrug*
 
Bodi said:
No, it isn't. I have to assume if you had a valid argument, you would be proving it now instead of getting emotional about it... *shrug*
Click to expand...
Guttmacher research publications are still online. You haven't called them to have them take it down yet? IDK why anyone would be upset that research is available, that's just wierd.
 
Teatime said:
Guttmacher research publications are still online. You haven't called them to have them take it down yet? IDK why anyone would be upset that research is available, that's just wierd.
Click to expand...
You said:
Teatime said:
I'm pro-choice and public policy is everyone's business.
Click to expand...
Knowing why women have abortions is not public policy
You then immediately switched your argument to:
Teatime said:
No it's public information:
Click to expand...
Knowing why a woman has an abortion is not public information either...

The debate stopped at that point with you having failed to make a valid argument despite the Red Herrings.
 
Bodi said:
Knowing why women have abortions is not public policy
Click to expand...
Correct. It's public information, not any kind of policy. It's research data and research data is not law.

Knowing why women have abortions is research data freely available to everyone. That's not an argument, that's a fact and I linked to it as proof.

Policy governing medical procedures of every kind is the public's business. Again, that's not an argument, that is also a dry fact, you can look up your state's law on it if you don't believe me that the public can read the policies.

You seem to want to change what is available to the public, which is fine, but the fact is that today these are in the public's eye.
 
Bodi said:
You are arguing that it is your business as to why a woman has an abortion or not?
Click to expand...
If my tax dollars are paying the bill for their irresponsibility and poor choice - absolutely my business.
At this time, American tax dollars subsidize approx. 24% of abortion costs.

If Harris wins - that will escalate a BUNCH.
Making it easier for more women to make those bad choices with no repercussions. We pay their bills.

Getting pregnant is overwhelmingly a voluntary action. It is very-very easy to avoid a pregnancy for the vast-vast majority of women.
They choose to do nothing and have sex anyway.
 
iamwhatiseem said:
If my tax dollars are paying the bill for their irresponsibility and poor choice - absolutely my business.
At this time, American tax dollars subsidize approx. 24% of abortion costs.

If Harris wins - that will escalate a BUNCH.
Making it easier for more women to make those bad choices with no repercussions. We pay their bills.

Getting pregnant is overwhelmingly a voluntary action. It is very-very easy to avoid a pregnancy for the vast-vast majority of women.
They choose to do nothing and have sex anyway.
Click to expand...
I imagine that subsidizing the cost of an abortion is much cheaper than subsidizing eighteen years of childcare.
 
iamwhatiseem said:
I also imagine being more responsible and taking very-very simple steps to avoid pregnancy is much cheaper than both
Click to expand...
You're telling single mothers to just be more responsible? Do you think that will work?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom