- Joined
- Nov 27, 2016
- Messages
- 36,197
- Reaction score
- 8,239
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Yet again, he was tasked to investigate Trump collusion with Russia. Everything else is ancillary.
I linked directly to the letter that granted him authority as the special council.
Here it is again.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html
Now... where has he strayed from his directive?
Yet again, he was tasked to investigate Trump collusion with Russia. Everything else is ancillary.
There is no reason you cant speculate. After all, you think there was collusion, so lets hear your theory.
Ok-- so when Mueller says that a senior Trump campaign official asked Stone if he could find out from Wikileaks what they had, what can one reasonably conclude?
It seems to me that one can conclude that Mueller is saying that the Trump campaign did not have a conduit to either Wikileaks or to Russia.
You are all over the place.
Yes, according to Mueller.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...9a09ff1e2a1_story.html?utm_term=.1856b0e7a3c2
Not really answering the question there.
Mueller is not out of line with the authority that he has been granted.
There is no way to spin it away from that.
Why in the hell would he keep all that knowing that his arrest was imminent?
Is that all of the info in the investigation?
Why in the hell would he keep all that knowing that his arrest was imminent?
Not according to Mueller. As even the article shows, Stone was not indicted for such connections and there is no indication that he had advanced knowledge of any Wikileaks dump.
You would not so this is just another Bull S story. So damn funny to watch anti-Trump folks convulse over stuff like this.
To make the FBI waste tons of time going through it.
I would not be surprised if most of it was not of his deviant lifestyle.
It is answering the question. Hiding behind a Manafort conviction is dodging the issue that really matters- whether the president conspired with Russia.
Yes, Mueller says that Stone was the campaign's conduit to WikiLeaks. He didn't charge him for it.
Stone was not charged with any crimes related to communicating with WikiLeaks about its activities, and he has repeatedly denied that he conspired with the group.
But the 24-page indictment against him details numerous occasions when Stone claimed to campaign officials that he had information about WikiLeaks or was in contact with Assange — and it depicts Trump aides and allies as acutely interested in learning about the group’s plans in advance.
The numerous interactions show that Trump allies were eager to leverage the hacked Democratic emails to their advantage — and that they saw Stone as someone with inside information useful in that effort.
What interest would Stone have in causing the FBI to waste time?
The investigation isn't over yet, so we don't know.
But the complaint that Mueller is somehow out of his lane doesn't hold water. Locking up Manafort for crimes that he for real committed falls well within the realm of his authority.
Yes, Mueller says that Stone was the campaign's conduit to WikiLeaks. He didn't charge him for it.
Stone was not charged with any crimes related to communicating with WikiLeaks about its activities, and he has repeatedly denied that he conspired with the group.
But the 24-page indictment against him details numerous occasions when Stone claimed to campaign officials that he had information about WikiLeaks or was in contact with Assange — and it depicts Trump aides and allies as acutely interested in learning about the group’s plans in advance.
The numerous interactions show that Trump allies were eager to leverage the hacked Democratic emails to their advantage — and that they saw Stone as someone with inside information useful in that effort.
As of this moment I am correct regardless of your Hope's and dreams...Can you link me to the Mueller report, I was not aware it was out yet.
Ok, educate me. Which one of the American criminal masterminds was indicted or plead guilty to conspiracy with Russia to throw the 2016 election?lol
Trying to redefine terms to escape? There have been many indictments, guilty pleas, jail time, etc. Of that there is no doubt. There's obviously some amount of wrong doing going about, and we'll see just how much it is, and how far up it goes.
Not for collusion there hasn'tdude, we'll all know when he reports. pretending that there is no evidence (just because some dude like yourself isn't privy to it) is just guessing.
now, there have been indictments and arrests. that's what we know so far. we know Mueller is good at this stuff (from his past history).
if i were you, i'd prepare for the worst and then if it's not so bad you're good to go.
Wheres the charges then? You got nothing but CT.1. Trump was found to have been in business talks over the Moscow Tower project up to the election even while denying he had any business relationship with Russia.
2. His son helped to arrange a meeting between the GRU and the Trump campaign to get information on Clinton
3. His campaign manager shared polling data with the GRU.
4. His adviser was a conduit between the GRU and the Trump campaign.
5. His foreign policy adviser was arranging to get dirt on Hillary Clinton
Trump and his campaign were balls deep in collusion and conspiracy, and denying this fact requires having just crossed over from a parallel universe that bears little resemblance to our own.
Not for collusion there hasn't
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
I think that's going to be the rallying cry from Trump supporters if Mueller finds that Trump killed somebody. No collusion baby!!!!
Ok, educate me. Which one of the American criminal masterminds was indicted or plead guilty to conspiracy with Russia to throw the 2016 election?
I'll wait.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?