Well don't forget to pack your tinfoil hat for this ride.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...unt_they_put_him_in_a_cage_and_shot_him.html#!George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley weighs in on a federal judge ordering the Mueller team to surrender documents surrounding the questioning of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
Turley called the case against Flynn a "canned hunt" and investigators effectively "put him in a cage and shot him" by bringing him up on charges of lying during an interview brought about under unorthodox means, according to FOX News.
Have you seen all the stuff Flynn was directly involved with in the Turkey dealings? His former partner was just indicted. Flynn was just as involved...https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...unt_they_put_him_in_a_cage_and_shot_him.html#!
Interesting coming from a respected law professor.
I wonder if that other FBI Agent will ever be asked to speak about this...under oath, of course. If it happens, I'm sure...like Stzrok, Comey, etc...he won't be able to remember a goddamned thing.
Have you seen all the stuff Flynn was directly involved with in the Turkey dealings? His former partner was just indicted. Flynn was just as involved...
So Flynn was lying many times in many ways about Russia, but also was guilty in the Turkey dealings. Trump knew he was under investigation...and compromised by Russia...why did he still put/keep him on as National Security Advisor?
No, Flyn is dirty in many colorful ways...trying to characterize him as the victim here...shame on you.
The only real question is what did he give up...other than his former partner in the Turkey deal...Mueller said info core to the Russia investigation. How good was this making it so the recommended a zero jail sentence...when clearly they could have bitten him with many more charges...obstruction..multiple counts of lying, acting as a foreign agent, his son who helped in some capacity....
For a former 3-star general & former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Flynn acted like a novice on his first day on the job. i have a feeling that this was deliberate for some hidden reason. He must have known that the FBI has always bugged the Russians' phones, so why throw himself under the bus by lying to the FBI? Unless Flynn is part of a larger, still hidden scheme to defraud the United States.
Being sure that a guy is dirty is no excuse for injustice, and if the people who run the system are so scared that they will not get the dirty guy that they go around justice then they should take this as their clue that the Justice system is as broken as I claim it is....and fix it.
What injustice? Trump as POTUS?
The incredibly generous plea deal Flynn got?
What injustice? Trump as POTUS?
The incredibly generous plea deal Flynn got?
"America. Goin' down. Everything ruined."
That's his routine, always. No matter that side he must take politically.
Being sure that a guy is dirty is no excuse for injustice, and if the people who run the system are so scared that they will not get the dirty guy that they go around justice then they should take this as their clue that the Justice system is as broken as I claim it is....and fix it.
If you dont know that America is headed South then you are not paying attention, and/or you dont know what matters. This is what education is for.
An undeserved favors: speaking deliberately vaguely does not convey the mystery and air of hidden authority that it is intended to convey.
There's a whole lot wrong with the justice system, but that mainly comes down to foolish but self-important judges appointed for the political results of their decisions, the fact that juries are made up of ordinary people, the fact that ordinary peopled are generally quite stupid, and the fact that the poorer the defendant the greater the likelihood of impropriety. Unless he's lying out of all ten corners of his ass, Trump can afford several armies of lawyers. He isn't going to get railroaded in front of a jury.
It any rate, police are allowed to lie to suspects. They're allowed to trick them. They have a habit of causing recording equipment to "malfunction" then remembering a completely different version of an interview than the suspect remembers. They do all sorts of things. But that happens to your mundane defendant. Your black person who made "furtive movements" when a cop approached, took out a bag of drugs, and threw it at the cop's feet (if you believe the lies many judges accept).
There are myriad problems with the criminal court system. Trump is not suffering from them.
(This post is more for the benefits of others).
WE USED TO HERPLAR A QUASAR APPLES!
After being identified the identities of the interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, Flynn provided the following information:.....
https://thehill.com/opinion/judicia...omey-getting-away-with-his-abuse-of-fbi-power“I probably wouldn’t have … gotten away with it.” Those words this week from former FBI Director James Comey could well be chiseled in marble as his epitaph. He was explaining another violation of bureau policy during his tenure days after meeting behind closed doors with House members.
What was shocking was not that Comey violated protocols or policies again but the reaction of the audience to his admission. In describing how he set up a critical meeting with Michael Flynn, former national security adviser to President Trump, the audience was audibly thrilled by his cleverness in keeping Flynn unrepresented by legal counsel and unaware of the true nature of the meeting.
.
.
.
What was Comey’s justification? Because he could. He refers to the “process” of other administrations. That process, however, was still in place and did not change. Moreover, he noted that he thought he could get away with it because this was “early” in the administration. That is not principle. It is opportunism. He was supposed to work through the Justice Department and not simply follow the rules only if he might be caught breaking them.
Has anyone noticed the sentence in the first paragraph that says.
Flynn was told he didn't need a lawyer. Clearly he wasn't told he was the target of a perjury trap. The agents already knew the answered because they had the phone conversations with the Russian Ambassador. They were just there to see if Flynn would lie to them. They did not Mirandize Flynn. So they did not identify the nature of the interview. They are lying on the 302 and there are three versions of the 302 and they tried to not give the original 302 to the judge. That is why the judge issued another order today demanding they give him the first 302. I doubt he will take the attempt at hiding the original 302 lightly tomorrow in court. Something stinks. Also Rosenstein would not make the second agent available to congress. If the agents lied on a portion of the 302 can we trust heir truthfulness on any of the 302.
Many people believe that if they are arrested and not "read their rights," they can escape punishment. Not true. But if the police fail to read a suspect his or her*Miranda*rights, the prosecutor can't use for most purposes anything the suspect says as evidence against the suspect at trial.*
Well don't forget to pack your tinfoil hat for this ride.
Trumps National Security Advisor working as an unregistered foreign agent...lying repeatedly and explicitly, numerous times in the now released memo from Mueller...
And you are wondering if the FBI agents will be questioned under oath? Good gods man.
Has anyone noticed the sentence in the first paragraph that says.
Flynn was told he didn't need a lawyer. Clearly he wasn't told he was the target of a perjury trap. The agents already knew the answered because they had the phone conversations with the Russian Ambassador. They were just there to see if Flynn would lie to them. They did not Mirandize Flynn. So they did not identify the nature of the interview. They are lying on the 302 and there are three versions of the 302 and they tried to not give the original 302 to the judge. That is why the judge issued another order today demanding they give him the first 302. I doubt he will take the attempt at hiding the original 302 lightly tomorrow in court. Something stinks. Also Rosenstein would not make the second agent available to congress. If the agents lied on a portion of the 302 can we trust heir truthfulness on any of the 302.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...unt_they_put_him_in_a_cage_and_shot_him.html#!
Interesting coming from a respected law professor.
Because those who have proved willing to die for us have earned better treatment...lets start there.Hmmm...they wouldn't have been able to put him in that cage if it wasn't of his own making--the "cage" in question was that what he lied to the FBI about would have been (and should have been) roundly condemned by American citizens. As for interviewing him under false pretenses, that's something that law enforcement officers do all the time to murderers, arsonists, kidnappers, rapists, and thieves, as well as potential hostile witnesses who did not themselves commit a crime. Hardly anyone complains about it in those circumstances. Why should it be any different here?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?