• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mount Rushmore

SNOWFLAKE

Crazy Canuck
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
11,981
Reaction score
6,962
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Mount Rushmore features the heads of four Presidents:
George Washington (1732–1799), Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826), Theodore Roosevelt (1858–1919) and Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)
Mount_Rushmore_detail_view_(100MP).jpg

So let's pretend, that it has been decided to another another head to the mountain, and you are sent a survey to ask you which former President you would like to see added to Mount Rushmore, which one would you pick?
 

tres borrachos

HoHoHo
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
82,927
Reaction score
57,593
Location
Biden's 'Murica
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate

aociswundumho

Capitalist Pig
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
7,045
Reaction score
2,794
Location
Bridgeport, CT
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
I'm surprised the left even tolerates the existence of this memorial. Two of them were unrepentant slave owners, and the other two were white supremacists.
 

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
20,226
Reaction score
7,560
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
FDR, then JFK.
 

tshade

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2021
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
816
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate

Antiwar

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
12,587
Reaction score
2,164
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
I'm surprised the left even tolerates the existence of this memorial. Two of them were unrepentant slave owners, and the other two were white supremacists.

I'm not surprised that right-libertarians tolerate it.
 

Antiwar

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
12,587
Reaction score
2,164
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
_______ Canuck. I'd give the land back to the Natives. I'd say sorry Europeans were such assholes. Reparations galore. Then I'd ask if they'll help us repair the land we ****ed up. Nobody needs more monuments to monumental studipity and barbarity.
 

NatMorton

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
9,202
Reaction score
3,157
Location
Greater Boston Area
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
_______ Canuck. I'd give the land back to the Natives. I'd say sorry Europeans were such assholes. Reparations galore. Then I'd ask if they'll help us repair the land we ****ed up. Nobody needs more monuments to monumental studipity and barbarity.
Start by giving back your land.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
22,603
Reaction score
10,071
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
What stupid conservative nonsense.
Nowhere near as stupid as your idea.

You should also consider turning over all of your other assets, as they are fruits of the poison tree.
 

Questerr

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 28, 2019
Messages
9,670
Reaction score
3,673
Location
San Antonio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Mount Rushmore features the heads of four Presidents:
George Washington (1732–1799), Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826), Theodore Roosevelt (1858–1919) and Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)
View attachment 67345330

So let's pretend, that it has been decided to another another head to the mountain, and you are sent a survey to ask you which former President you would like to see added to Mount Rushmore, which one would you pick?

I would pick to give the land back to the local Native American tribes and then applaud if they decided to dynamite the faces off their sacred mountain.
 

Antiwar

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
12,587
Reaction score
2,164
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
Nowhere near as stupid as your idea.

You should also consider turning over all of your other assets, as they are fruits of the poison tree.

Binary bullshit that aligns with the T**** conservatives.
 

Antiwar

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
12,587
Reaction score
2,164
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
Why would we not start with stolen Federal land?

Because they have to break things down to the lowest common denominator and binary logic. That's how they operate. If any land is returned to the rightful inhabitants, we gotta start with your quarter of an acre. "What, you don't want to do that? You're a hypocrite." And if we give any land back we have to supposedly give it all back and move back to Europe. JFC.
 

Questerr

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 28, 2019
Messages
9,670
Reaction score
3,673
Location
San Antonio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Like the Black Hills, by treaty was Lakota land that the Federal government went back on its word and stole from them when gold was found under it.

How is it a controversial statement to say the land should be returned to the Lakota?

It’s amazing how the Right hates the Federal government taking people’s property unless those people are non-white.
 

Antiwar

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
12,587
Reaction score
2,164
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
Like the Black Hills, by treaty was Lakota land that the Federal government went back on its word and stole from them when gold was found under it.

How is it a controversial statement to say the land should be returned to the Lakota?

It’s amazing how the Right hates the Federal government taking people’s property unless those people are non-white.

That's what the federal government is for, for right-libertarians: To protect the racket.
 
Top Bottom