The Patriots, outside of the quarterback, was inferior to the Colts even during their dynasty on a stat sheet basis.
Um, what? Are you just talking about Offense?
During the same time period the Patriots have had 5 top ten defenses, with one of those being top 5. They've had multiple hall of fame contender defensive players spread across the D-Line, LB, and Secondary.
The O-lines between the Colts and Patriots during that time also could be a relative wash.
What I will give you is Manning's WR's during the early days were absolutely worse than Peyton's top two guys during that time period. Then again, the last few years have made that closer to a wash as the Moss/Welker combination was arguably as good, if not better, than Peyton's.
Neither team has been steller for the whole time with RB. Edge had some great seasons. Dillon had one great season for the Pats but after that its mostly been by committee, with a few yeards of having two 700+ yard backs.
Manning had Pettigrew for most of his career, while I bet you couldn't name the Pats TE pre-Welker. Manning gets Marshall Faulk and Edgerrin James. Brady gets BenJarvis Green-Ellis and Danny Woodhead. For a while, they had the younger and marginally talented Faulk.
You're making it hard to take you seriously...
Manning's TE you're going for I'm guessing is....Dallas Clark?
Also, Wes Welker isn't a TE.
And furthermore, I'd put Corey Dillon (the guy who rushed for 1600 yards for the pats one season and was part of a dual 700+ yard backfield another year) and Laurence Maroney or Kevin Faulk up there before BJGE or Danny Woodhead. Funny that you take Brady's most current guys and put it up against Peyton's early backs rather than "Donald Brown and Joseph Addai".
Oh, and Manning did not have a young healthy Faulk for "a while"....he had him for one year, his rookie season.
And as I said, his SB win should have an asterisk because they beat one of the worst teams to ever make a SB.
That Bears team went 13-3. That Bears team had one of, if not the, greatest kick returner of all time. They had a top 5 defense and a 1200 yard back. Was Rex Grossman and their WR corps a problem? Absolutely. But they weren't significantly any worse than some other teams in the superbowl this decade such as the Cardinals or the Seahawks.
This is just ridiculous.