• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man Who Fired First Shots Behind Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha Has Been Charged

Lursa said:
Yes thanks! I remember that one...it was pretty much the only one. "Could" was just hopeful thinking from one attorney "associated with the case."

And it confirms what I posted.
Click to expand...

Are you confused? Lawyers have said the law is poorly written and there is a case,

THAT confirms what you posted? Except that you said you posted 3 lawyers who said he's guilty etc.....

You are all over the map like normal.
 
Lursa said:
Yeah and back then I posted several links that showed that's an incorrect interpretation by posters here. The links I posted were from legal sites interpreting the law.

What is your source that says otherwise?
Click to expand...

THATs what you posted....and yet when faced with interpretations AGAINST what you posted, you say it confirms what you posted lol.

Ok.
 
Mr Person said:
^^
Funny how the article doesn't contain "BLM" or "ANTIFA", but PoS *just knows* the parties responsible are those Trump told him to hate.

Back in reality, we understand that the greatest terror threat - identified by Trump's own government - is right wing terrorism.
Click to expand...
Greatest terror threat. Not the greatest criminal threat. I live in Baltimore. I’m often in Memphis, Cincinnati and Rochester. There’s murders and assaults by the thousands. Not much in the way of “right wing terrorism “. Lol 😂
 
Mr Person said:
^^
Funny how the article doesn't contain "BLM" or "ANTIFA", but PoS *just knows* the parties responsible are those Trump told him to hate.

Back in reality, we understand that the greatest terror threat - identified by Trump's own government - is right wing terrorism.
Click to expand...
Many of us, you included have stated that for years - and look at how well DOJ handled it
 
ASHES said:
C'mon, Kelly Ziminski had BLM on her backpack. They weren't hiding their allegiances. Not that they truly believed in The Cause, but still useful idiots for it.

In my mind, the injection of politics by both sides into criminal cases as demonstrated in these threads is what is pushing the narrative farther and farther from the truth. It isn't the left, it isn't the right, it's us and our stupid blame game. Ignore that game and these events are much easier to analyze and come to the correct conclusion, which shouldn't always align with your politics.
Click to expand...
I do not recall Obama interfering in the DOJ.
Perhaps there will be something?
 
sjmay said:
THATs what you posted....and yet when faced with interpretations AGAINST what you posted, you say it confirms what you posted lol.

Ok.
Click to expand...
There are other statements in the source you posted that said what I did.

Did you read it? :rolleyes:
 
sjmay said:
Are you confused? Lawyers have said the law is poorly written and there is a case,

THAT confirms what you posted? Except that you said you posted 3 lawyers who said he's guilty etc.....

You are all over the map like normal.
Click to expand...
ONE lawyer, representing or associated with Rittenhaus said it.

The other opinions in the article disagreed.
 
Lursa said:
ONE lawyer, representing or associated with Rittenhaus said it.

The other opinions in the article disagreed.
Click to expand...

So you are over the map AND you can't read.....

" But John Monroe, a lawyer who specializes in gun rights cases, believes an exception for rifles and shotguns, intended to allow people age 16 and 17 to hunt, could apply. "

Does Monroe represent Rittenhaus?

"Tom Grieve, a Milwaukee defense lawyer who also specializes in gun cases, agreed the exception might apply beyond hunting, but said that part of the law is poorly drafted. He said he would argue to apply a rule of law that interprets ambiguous criminal statutes in favor of the defendant. "

Well ****, does Tom Grieve represent Rittenhaus?

Either way, that's TWO separate lawyers....as opposed to ONE lawyer.

Learn how to ****ing read.
 
ASHES said:
Rosenbaum tried taking his gun away before he shot anyone.
Click to expand...


And Rittenhouse is being tried for the murder of Rosenbaum and Huber. After allegedly murdering Rosenbaum, Rittenhouse fled the scene of the murder and then allegedly murdered one of his pursuers, Huber.
 
bluesmoke said:
And Rittenhouse is being tried for the murder of Rosenbaum and Huber. After allegedly murdering Rosenbaum, Rittenhouse fled the scene of the murder and then allegedly murdered one of his pursuers, Huber.
Click to expand...
Huber died pulling on the barrel of someone else's rifle. Rosenbaum died chasing and attempting to disarm someone illegally (strongarm robbery, assault). Grosskreutz got shot in the arm after misreading the situation and not backing down when other people did and they didn't get shot. There was no murder.
 
ASHES said:
Huber died pulling on the barrel of someone else's rifle. Rosenbaum died chasing and attempting to disarm someone illegally (strongarm robbery, assault). Grosskreutz got shot in the arm after misreading the situation and not backing down when other people did and they didn't get shot. There was no murder.
Click to expand...


Murder has yet to be determined. But the trial is for murder.
 
bluesmoke said:
Murder has yet to be determined. But the trial is for murder.
Click to expand...
No, murder is not the charge in WI. The charge is 1st degree intentional homicide.
 
A conservative hero: a kid who crosses state lines with an illegal firearm in order to cause trouble; ends up killing two people in "self defense".
 
Dans La Lune said:
A conservative hero: a kid who crosses state lines with an illegal firearm in order to cause trouble; ends up killing two people in "self defense".
Click to expand...

A liberal who can't read, doesn't know the facts, and still espouses an opinion....... go figure.
 
Dans La Lune said:
A conservative hero: a kid who crosses state lines with an illegal firearm in order to cause trouble; ends up killing two people in "self defense".
Click to expand...
I'm not conservative, he's not a hero, he never "crossed state lines with an illegal firearm" and there is exactly zero evidence he went there to cause trouble, unlike his attackers who were there to break stuff and light fires.
 
PoS said:
The truth is finally coming out: BLM and antifa are the real terrorists in these riots.
Click to expand...
I don’t how bad it can get when BLM and Antifa can demand a “seat at the table” and the electee is too cowardly to tell them “NO, we don’t give arsonist thugs a seat anywhere except in prison”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
sjmay said:
A liberal who can't read, doesn't know the facts, and still espouses an opinion....... go figure.
Click to expand...

I admit I'm not married to the story. Which part did I get wrong?
 
ASHES said:
I'm not conservative, he's not a hero, he never "crossed state lines with an illegal firearm" and there is exactly zero evidence he went there to cause trouble, unlike his attackers who were there to break stuff and light fires.
Click to expand...

So Kyle was allowed to possess that firearm?
 
Seeing Gateway Pundit as the source for this automatically prompts the search in the article for the inevitable BS and sure enough:
This strengthens the case that Rittenhouse had reason to fear for his life and was acting in self defense when he shot and killed two rioters.
Click to expand...
If you fascists think this is going to get Rittenhouse off you're even more out of touch with reality than we thought.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom