- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 18,986
- Reaction score
- 25,133
- Location
- Mid-West USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
So this happened in Illinois on the 4th of July.
Forbes Welcome
I raise this issue to bring up two points:
1. This is a perfect example showing people why posting on Facebook (or any other social media) in not always in one's best interests.
2. Notice that the charges include both desecration, which under Texas v. Johnson 491 U.S. 397 (1989) cannot be made illegal by itself; and disorderly conduct which might fall under the Texas V. Johnson clarification allowing charges for the narrow government interest of preventing "flag burnings that were likely to result in a serious disturbance of the peace." https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/491/397/case.html
I don't agree with this arrest if it was based solely on reactions to a Facebook post. However, there might be some small basis if calls came in from neighbors who saw him doing this in his neighborhood. But even then it was on his own private property, done apparently for the purpose of posting on his Facebook page to express his opinion, and not to incite violence. That clearly falls under First Amendment protections explained in Texas v. Johnson, since the target audience was that small fraction of the total U.S. population who are his "followers."
Yes it is the 4th of July. Yes, many Americans feel that the symbolism of the Flag should allow legal protection against desecration. Yes, people will get upset as a result.
Still, IMO it is his personal property once purchased and he can wear it, or burn it, or fly it, and it's none of our business.
My pride rests in the Nation, not in it's symbols.
When I was a soldier I would gladly defend our garrison flag from all comers. Because in that instance it clearly represented the symbol of our nation in that spot, at that time, and by extension my right to be there to serve my nation's interests. It was my job to protect it.
A common citizen's handling of their own property is not the same thing, and I support their First Amendment right to use it to express themselves howsoever they will.
A 22-year-old Illinois man has been charged with desecrating the American flag after he posted photos on Facebook along with messages decrying the state of violence and race in the U.S.. Police received numerous calls from citizens concerned about his safety and theirs. Mellott has been charged with Section 49-1, flag desecration, a class four felony in Illinois. He’s also been charged with disorderly conduct, both as an offender and a victim. The reason for both classifications is because police fielded calls from people making threatening calls against Mellott while he himself committed an act that was “causing others to be put at risk of harm.” Flag burning is not technically illegal in the U.S. According to the 1989 ruling in Texas v. Johnson, the American “flag is so revered because it represents the land of the free, and that freedom includes the ability to use or abuse that flag in protest.”
Forbes Welcome
I raise this issue to bring up two points:
1. This is a perfect example showing people why posting on Facebook (or any other social media) in not always in one's best interests.
2. Notice that the charges include both desecration, which under Texas v. Johnson 491 U.S. 397 (1989) cannot be made illegal by itself; and disorderly conduct which might fall under the Texas V. Johnson clarification allowing charges for the narrow government interest of preventing "flag burnings that were likely to result in a serious disturbance of the peace." https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/491/397/case.html
I don't agree with this arrest if it was based solely on reactions to a Facebook post. However, there might be some small basis if calls came in from neighbors who saw him doing this in his neighborhood. But even then it was on his own private property, done apparently for the purpose of posting on his Facebook page to express his opinion, and not to incite violence. That clearly falls under First Amendment protections explained in Texas v. Johnson, since the target audience was that small fraction of the total U.S. population who are his "followers."
Yes it is the 4th of July. Yes, many Americans feel that the symbolism of the Flag should allow legal protection against desecration. Yes, people will get upset as a result.
Still, IMO it is his personal property once purchased and he can wear it, or burn it, or fly it, and it's none of our business.
My pride rests in the Nation, not in it's symbols.
When I was a soldier I would gladly defend our garrison flag from all comers. Because in that instance it clearly represented the symbol of our nation in that spot, at that time, and by extension my right to be there to serve my nation's interests. It was my job to protect it.
A common citizen's handling of their own property is not the same thing, and I support their First Amendment right to use it to express themselves howsoever they will.
Last edited: