No.Do YOU believe the Mainstream Media is and has been fair, objective and unbiased in their reporting on current political and social issues?
Nope.Do YOU believe the Mainstream Media is and has been fair, objective and unbiased in their reporting on current political and social issues?
The problem Trump has with the MSM is that they call him out when he says something that is not true. Fox is much more forgiving and jokers like Hannity actually amplify his lies and conspiracy theories.Do YOU believe the Mainstream Media is and has been fair, objective and unbiased in their reporting on current political and social issues?
Lol what???I believe it has a small bias, but nothing nearly as strong as Fox and right-wing media. Opinion shows in the evening are more biased, but again are based on more facts than opinion shows on Fox.
The MSM is not red or blue.....it's green. And people who complain about it hate capitalismDo YOU believe the Mainstream Media is and has been fair, objective and unbiased in their reporting on current political and social issues?
Capitalism is the reason we're in this shit.The MSM is not red or blue.....it's green. And people who complain about it hate capitalism
Lol what???
CNN insider blows whistle on Network President Jeff Zucker’s personal vendetta against President Trump -
Project Veritas, best known for catching liberal leaning groups in embarrassing, hidden camera moments, has turned their attention towards CNN. They released today, what they see as purely anti-Trump comments from top leadership at CNN. Some of the videos released show Jeff Zucker vowing to...www.kusi.com
There are a slew of sources indicating the Zucker forces his staff to cover anti-Trump stories wall to wall. And has kniption fits when they don't.lol Veritas
There are a slew of sources indicating the Zucker forces his staff to cover anti-Trump stories wall to wall. And has kniption fits when they don't.
This is well documented. And pretty much common knowledge at this point.
Conniption fits I think.There are a slew of sources indicating the Zucker forces his staff to cover anti-Trump stories wall to wall. And has kniption fits when they don't.
This is well documented. And pretty much common knowledge at this point.
Grow up, lady.
Your husband lied and conspired to take down the freaking President. Hell, what YOU'VE gone through doesn't even compare to what Stone's wife went through when jack-booted thugs invaded her home in the middle of the night and rousted her out in her nightgown.
Screw you.
A textbook example of, "malaise and loss of civic virtue".
"..Oh my
Life has passed me by
The country I was brought up in
Fell apart and died..."
I'm sure I'll forget to do it, sometimes, but I'm going to try to set an example by including the above quote box at the bottom of every future post because it epitomizes the "rot" (i.e., the moral decay) on this forum and in this (thug) country.
Lucy's Football & Charlie Brown= Barr, Durham, Flynn, Benghazi, Hillary's Email, Vince Foster, "Slick Willy" Whitewater, Travelgate
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barr-unmasking-review-no-charges/2020/10/13/0f63fd2e-0d67-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html National Security ‘Unmasking’ probe commissioned by Barr concludes without charges or any public report By Matt Zapotosky and Shane Harris Oct. 13, 2020...debatepolitics.com
Back in 2017, after Trump's first 100 days, Harvard released a study on media coverage of the President. It was ugly.
....
News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days | Shorenstein Center
A new report from Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzes news coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office. The report is based on an analysis of news reports in the print editions of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and...shorensteincenter.org
They openly admit they are, there's no point in debating it.Do YOU believe the Mainstream Media is and has been fair, objective and unbiased in their reporting on current political and social issues?
1. That NYT opinion piece shows conclusively that their rag is totally biased against Trump. It's a regurgitation of all the spin, speculation, hyperbole, innuendo and lies they...and the rest of the MSM...have blown out their assholes since BEFORE Trump became President.I beg to differ;
Opinion | The Times’s Indictment of President Trump (Published 2020)
Readers react to a special section of the Sunday Review that outlined how the president has “gravely damaged the United States” and why he is “unfit to lead the nation.”www.nytimes.com
Roger Stone has played a key role in undermining the Russian attribution of the 2016 election year operation. But the SSCI and Mueller Reports barely mention how closely Stone's efforts mirror those of WikiLeaks.Home | emptywheel
www.emptywheel.net
20 CommentsHome - emptywheel
www.emptywheel.net
/
October 17, 2020
/
emptywheel
"This post showed that the SSCI Report ignored a lot of evidence (laid out in the affidavits) that Jerome Corsi and Roger Stone had specific details -- possibly even the John Podesta emails themselves -- pertaining to Joule Holdings, which they tried to use to claim he was as corrupt as (!!!) Paul Manafort. This post showed how, rather than actually explaining what the investigation learned about whether, how, and why Stone optimized the release of the Podesta files, the Mueller Report instead gave us a comedy routine starring Jerome Corsi.
Both public reports, then, presented the question, what did the candidate’s rat-****er know and when did he know it, exclusively in terms of what Stone knew about the Podesta release. Indeed, the SSCI Report treats this as a question exclusively about what Stone knew of WikiLeaks’ plans.…"
....and a helluva lot fairer than you've been to Mrs. Vindman....
Thanks. It's nice to have some examples of unfair, slanted, misleading and sometimes entirely fabricated coverage. I particularly liked EO13769, which was challenged but approved.....speaking of ugly....
The Inaugural AddressThe Inaugural Address | The White House
REMARKS OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP – AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY INAUGURAL ADDRESS FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 2017 WASHINGTON, D.C. As Prepared for Delivery – Chiewww.whitehouse.gov
Issued on: January 20, 2017
".....But for too many of our citizens, a different reality exists: Mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities; rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation; an education system, flush with cash, but which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of knowledge; and the crime and gangs and drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential. This American carnage stops right here and stops right now...."
Trump's most insulting — and violent — language is often ...https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/02/trumps-most-insulting-violent-language-is-often-reserved-immigrants/
Oct 2, 2019Trump's comments regularly dispute the narrative that his words should not be taken literally. ... "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best," he ... They're rapists ...
Executive Order 13769, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, politically labeled as a Muslim ban by detractors or a travel ban by supporters, was an executive order by United States President Donald Trump. Except for the extent to which it was blocked by various courts, it was in effect from January 27, 2017, until March 6, 2017, when it was ...
Trump's 'travel ban' really was a Muslim ban. You can see ...https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/26/trumps-muslim-ban-really-was-muslim-ban-thats-what-data-suggest/
Sep 26, 2019Trump's travel ban really was a Muslim ban, data suggests. What the Trump administration's data can and can't tell us about the true effect of the travel ban. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn ...
1. That NYT opinion piece shows conclusively that their rag is totally biased against Trump. It's a regurgitation of all the spin, speculation, hyperbole, innuendo and lies they...and the rest of the MSM...have blown out their assholes since BEFORE Trump became President.
2. What the **** is "emptywheel.net"? Are you trying to say they are NOT biased? Hell, are you trying to say that a site I've never heard of is MSM? Do you even know what this thread is all about?
3. I don't give a rat's ass about Mrs. Vindman. She is irrelevant to ANY political issue. Her husband, on the other hand, should be ashamed to call himself an American and is a disgrace to the US Army. I suggest she work on her husband...try to turn him into a decent, honorable human being instead of whining, crying and following her husband's example on how to be a despicable, biased person.
Judge Walton, earlier this year, read the most unredacted version of the Mueller Report in the course of an FOIA litigation and has grilled the DOJ about justification for remaining redactions.....
1. That NYT opinion piece shows conclusively that their rag is totally biased against Trump. It's a regurgitation of all the spin, speculation, hyperbole, innuendo and lies they...and the rest of the MSM...have blown out their assholes since BEFORE Trump became President.
-snip-
Please share why you believe so strongly that this is biased, or even unreasonable.:
What part of " That NYT opinion piece shows conclusively that their rag is totally biased against Trump. It's a regurgitation of all the spin, speculation, hyperbole, innuendo and lies they...and the rest of the MSM...have blown out their assholes since BEFORE Trump became President. " do you not understand?
Of course it’s highly biased toward the left of centre liberal world view ...same here in the U.K.. The MSM is part of the political establishment...and the establishment is social democratic in Europe at least...the USA seems to be on the same slide to self destruction too.Do YOU believe the Mainstream Media is and has been fair, objective and unbiased in their reporting on current political and social issues?
That’s how it feels from over here...the BBC despises Trump...it’s one of the reasons I like him because I despise the BBC.Back in 2017, after Trump's first 100 days, Harvard released a study on media coverage of the President. It was ugly.
News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days | Shorenstein Center
A new report from Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzes news coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office. The report is based on an analysis of news reports in the print editions of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and...shorensteincenter.org