- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 20,027
- Reaction score
- 7,648
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
Couldn't love a dumb dude, huh?
I can't speak for GG, buy I know o couldn't.
I've tried.
Couldn't love a dumb dude, huh?
I can't speak for GG, buy I know o couldn't.
I've tried.
Some women are way too smart, they know just when to act dumb. :lol:
I can love a woman without being in love with her...if we're related. Other than that, I have to invoke more movie wisdom here.
I'll beg to differ.
I have several guy friends, happily, solidly married, that I knew long before they were married, and they are some of my best friends. They knew me back when, they know me now, and never was sex a part of it. 35 years I've known them, and the opportunity has existed if sex was on their minds, heck, I've slept in the same bed with two of them back then (a group drunk, lol) and nothing happened.
I love 'em. I'd do anything for them, and they for me. They will always be some of my dearest friends.
Either they're gay or they loooooooooooooove their wives.
Or are afraid of them.
But before they were married and single? Nope, your explanation doesn't hold water, Gipper.
And they sure as hell aren't gay.
Post a picture.
Don't have any here at work.... will hunt for them at home.
Though why I have to prove they aren't gay is beyond me.
Don't have any here at work.... will hunt for them at home.
Though why I have to prove they aren't gay is beyond me.
Well if you post a pic and you're some ridiculous knockout that guys can magically behave around...I'm gonna question a few aspects of your story.
I've posted pictures of me before. No, I'm not a 'knockout', but I don't scare small children either. :wink:
Besides, looks are a very very small part of person, at least by those who have that other trait I value......
Intelligence and fidelity are not synonymous. Einstein was a complete dog when it comes to the ladies.
I didn't say intelligence and fidelity were synonymous.
I said looks are a small item on the grand scale of things, especially when someone is intelligent (and sees beyond the skin).
Yeah, but it sucks when you have to settle for us smart, ugly dudes.
I don't consider it 'settling'. There in lies the difference. :wink:
You can only wake up next to a man and be frightened when you first open your eyes so many times. Eventually he just mopes and leaves because "he's not good enough for her".
Rocky Dennis could be the living epitome of Jesus Christ, and he's still not getting any strange.
Looks have never been of importance to me. I've dated 'ugly' men, I've dated 'handsome' men. More often than not, the 'ugly' guy has more to offer in the way of humor, intelligence and personality then the handsome one.
Just my experience.
Also, sometimes the ugly guy may have "more to offer".
:roll:
You are such a guy sometimes.....
Looks have never been of importance to me. I've dated 'ugly' men, I've dated 'handsome' men. More often than not, the 'ugly' guy has more to offer in the way of humor, intelligence and personality then the handsome one.
Just my experience.
Looks have never been of importance to me. I've dated 'ugly' men, I've dated 'handsome' men. More often than not, the 'ugly' guy has more to offer in the way of humor, intelligence and personality then the handsome one.
Just my experience.
So that's what it is. I've noticed this since high school. It was always the socially apt and confident fugly guys that consistently dated the most [generally] desirable girls.