The Progressive-Fascists Racism and failure is actually a bit more subtle than that.
If a person were to state, "Hamdil has got to be a wizard at higher mathematics, because he is Hindi and from India.", that would be a very racist statement.
( It is actually TRUE, that India has produced a large number of mathematical geniuses, but that is party due to their large population, a culture which admires and encourages higher education, and the poverty that much of the country suffers from forcing many of their brightest students into disciplines such as mathematics, which can be pursued and developed without allot of expensive equipment. India Culture and Society does not produce allot of wizards at experimental high altitude aircraft, because prototypes are very expensive! )
It is assuming a positive value, skill and talent at Mathematics, rather than the usually racist Negatives, assumptions of stupidity, low-wealth, or lack of morals...
But it is still an Assumption about an individual, based on a racial stereotype, and surface knowledge of the person, who might actually be one of the most obtuse people on the subject of mathematics anywhere on the planet.
Not all Racism needs to be a racial assumption of a Negative attribute.
The far-lefties on this thread are assuming that Lynch would be a good candidate for the supreme court, of all the lawyers out there in government service, simply because she is a Black Woman, and therefore able to play the race card, making her Supreme-Court-Political-Agenda automatically aligned with the far-left, and also impossible to question, or refute.
Assuming Lynch would be a good Justice candidate simply because the far-left's agenda could use the RACE-CARD as Political Armor is the most VILE type of RACISM.
It is most VILE, because it assumes Political-Racial-Extortion as its foundation and justification. It assumes the most abusive and corrosive abuse of RACE from the onset! It is also vile, because it assumes that the position of Justice will be used to advance a political Agenda, rather than serve the neutral legal function of interpreting the LAW, as passed by the Legislature.
The fact is, the only candidates we should be even considering, are those lawyers with suitable training and experience, who do NOT have a Supreme-Court-Political-Agenda !
Lady Liberty wears a symbolic blindfold for a REASON!
-