I do quite a bit. ignore a lot as well. But, we're being very specific here. And I don't agree with your choices. There is a spectrum, not to mention shades of gray.
You don't have to agree with my choices. You just can't do anything about it less I infringe upon the rights of others.
Fair enough, but the past string of public shootings (outside of gang related violence) have been almost all committed by mentally disturbed people.
Then who were you referring to when you said "a country fully in love with guns might have a cultural failure". Granted that there is a lot of glorified violence on videos and TV but much of that is certainly inspired by, or made by, Hollywood.
You don't have to agree with my choices. You just can't do anything about it less I infringe upon the rights of others.
Yeah, pretty familiar with all of that, but I was speaking a little more recently. Still, that was a cultural problem Without the support of the people, it wouldn't have happened. We were the problem.
OK, well, recently, then, one could argue that Roe vs Wade equals a lot of dead folks. Then there was the thing about pulling plugs on folks on life support, and even more recently, the thing about letting health care workers decide to end a person's health care if they believe said person is beyond help. All of those things came about as direct, or indirect results, of voting, and they all either have, or will have, a direct result on body counts.
Not simple - simple minded
No, that's what they say when they're losing
I don't have to prove you wrong. All I have to do is point to your complete inability to support your own claim.
Right, keep thinking that the majority agrees with you (which is just another instance of you making a claim you can't support)
It's nothing a quick Google search can't verify, sangha's just being a griefer.The very fact that this shooting wasn't stopped by a law enforcement officer proves my point.
The very fact that this shooting wasn't stopped by a law enforcement officer proves my point.
Actually, according to SCOTUS, we can do something about your choices when it comes to guns.
Who's, "we"?
The Left
You, as an American citizens can't infringe upon my rights. An attitude like that will cause people to go to the cartridge box, so you might want to be careful.
The Precious Flowers who threaten violence to compensate for their cowardice will do nothing as The Left advances our agenda besides post angry rants and YouTube videos on the Internet
There's nothing, anywhere, that says you have the power to do a damn thing. This isn't a tyranny, yet.
We have a plethora of gun regulations that prove you wrong, and there will be even more regulations in the future.
And tyranny or not, the gun-wielding Precious Flowers will do nothing about it but post on the Internet.
You, as an American citizens can't infringe upon my rights. An attitude like that will cause people to go to the cartridge box, so you might want to be careful.
I hope you're wrong on both accounts.
Nor have "I" tried. I will argue my position, and I do note the legal precedence. I'm also willing to live under the law however it pans out.
So long as the law abides the rights and liberties of the individual then that's fine. I won't, however, carte blanche excuse all government force or law. It is a per basis evaluation
With respect to both of those, hope is all you've got.
Well, regardless of what the American-hatin-Libbos think, this is still America and we're not going to sit back and do nothing while our rights are stripped away.
I agree. You won't do "nothing"
You'll post more angry rants and YouTube videos on the internet
Thank you for agreeing with me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?