• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kinky Sex?

cpgrad08 said:
That's true but I have to detain people for this.

P.S. thanks for telling me something I already know.
Click to expand...

let's see what you tell us you actually knew:
cpgrad08 said:
No they have be divorce. Seperation means to the Military that your just not living under the same roof but are still Married.

Source: Am a MP.
Click to expand...

now let's examine the excerpt i provided:
... In most cases, commanding officers are not going to be all that concerned with sexual relationships that happen after a member is legally separated from his/her spouse, unless it's a matter that involves some other direct negative impact on the Military, such as fraternization.
Click to expand...

your responses do not reconcile

but i am biased. grew up - more precisely, grew older - dealing with the MPs as an authority challenging military brat
 
spud_meister said:
:lol: I want to hear now
Click to expand...

:raises eybrow: don't tell me you've never heard of the banana show.


as for the adultery; Justabubba, usually in this case it's used by the separated wife against her husband. for example, one of my buddies is currently in the middle of a seperation leading to divorce. He's in Afghanistan and has planned a vacation for when he get's back. When his wife found out, she tried to get charges laid against him by the military (assuming that the only reason he would be going on a vacation after Afghanistan would be to have sex with someone other than her) in order to give her a leg up in the divorce proceedings. moh dolla bills, ya'll...

there's alot of stuff that goes on in the military that is "against the regulations" and punishable that is allowed to slide as long as it doesn't become a problem.

for example, Cpl Beltbuckle has sex with a woman who is technically married but has been separated for 9 of the 12 months necessary to get a divorce in NCarolina. probably not an issue, don't talk about it so that we would "have" to notice.

.... then Cpl Beltbuckle has sex with a woman who is technically married but has been separated for 9 of the 12 months necessary to get a divorce in NCarolina... who is still technically the wife of his platoon sergeant. now it's a problem, and so now the good Cpl is going to stand tall in front of the letter of the law.
 
Last edited:
justabubba said:
let's see what you tell us you actually knew:

now let's examine the excerpt i provided:

your responses do not reconcile

but i am biased. grew up - more precisely, grew older - dealing with the MPs as an authority challenging military brat
Click to expand...

I was talking about the letter of the law. Which there they do match up. It's like J-walking in the since that it's agianst the law but how many is it actually enforce.

Article 134- Adultery
Article 134— Adultery
 
cpwill said:
:raises eybrow: don't tell me you've never heard of the banana show.


as for the adultery; Justabubba, usually in this case it's used by the separated wife against her husband. for example, one of my buddies is currently in the middle of a seperation leading to divorce. He's in Afghanistan and has planned a vacation for when he get's back. When his wife found out, she tried to get charges laid against him by the military (assuming that the only reason he would be going on a vacation after Afghanistan would be to have sex with someone other than her) in order to give her a leg up in the divorce proceedings. moh dolla bills, ya'll...

there's alot of stuff that goes on in the military that is "against the regulations" and punishable that is allowed to slide as long as it doesn't become a problem.

for example, Cpl Beltbuckle has sex with a woman who is technically married but has been separated for 9 of the 12 months necessary to get a divorce in NCarolina. probably not an issue, don't talk about it so that we would "have" to notice.

.... then Cpl Beltbuckle has sex with a woman who is technically married but has been separated for 9 of the 12 months necessary to get a divorce in NCarolina... who is still technically the wife of his platoon sergeant. now it's a problem, and so now the good Cpl is going to stand tall in front of the letter of the law.
Click to expand...
no quibble with that
in fact the cite i provided offered considerable insight about the variety of permutations of situations which would be subject to article 15 or court martial action and those which likely would not
some more excerpts:
There are three "Elements of Proof" for the offense of Adultery in the Military:

* (1) That the accused wrongfully had sexual intercourse with a certain person;

* (2) That, at the time, the accused or the other person was married to someone else; and

* (3) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
Click to expand...
You may be surprised to learn that adultery is not listed as an offense in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
... Adultery in the military is actually prosecuted under Article 134, which is also known as the "General Article." Article 134 simply prohibits conduct which is of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, or conduct which is prejudicial to good order and discipline.
... A quiet adulterous affair that nobody knows about is probably not going to have a negative impact on the unit(s) of the parties involved.
... What all of this means is that many incidents of "adultery" may not be considered a punishable "crime" in the military, unless the commanding officer determines that there is some kind of direct negative impact on the military itself.
Click to expand...
Factors Commanding Officers are Required to Consider

As mentioned above, the Manual For Courts-Martial now require commanding officers to consider certain factors when determining whether or not adultery has a direct negative impact on the military, and should be considered a criminal offense:

* The accused's marital status, military rank, grade, or position.

* The co-actor's marital status, military rank, grade, and position, or relationship to the armed forces.

* The military status of the accused's spouse or the spouse of co-actor, or their relationship to the armed forces.

If a high-ranking Military officer such as a Wing Commander, or Battalion Commander is having an affair, this is much more likely to have a direct negative impact on the Military (public perception-wise) than if a two-striper is having an affair.
Click to expand...
this causes me to believe that jerry - assuming he is not in a command position - if separated and having discreet sex with someone who is not attached to the military is not likely going to be subject to court martial if he gets his groove on with a woman other than his estranged spouse
 
cpwill said:
it involves the entertainers ability to dice a banana.... unconventionally.
Click to expand...

Spud doesn't need to know about that. =)
 
cpwill said:
it involves the entertainers ability to dice a banana.... unconventionally.
Click to expand...

I once saw a show in Bangkok involving a trapeze, a cucumber and a razor blade. Am I in the right territory? It certainly didn't feel like it at the time.
 
Theres a video with some guy playing a piano with his dick somewhere!!!


...8|

totally.
 
justabubba said:
this causes me to believe that jerry - assuming he is not in a command position - if separated and having discreet sex with someone who is not attached to the military is not likely going to be subject to court martial if he gets his groove on with a woman other than his estranged spouse
Click to expand...

unless his CO is a prick. then Jerry's goose is cooked because officers who are pricks spend much of their free time studying the regs so that they know all the ins and outs on how to screw over people that piss them off.

as I said earlier, it is not worth the risk.
 
We use to love outdoor and "semi-public" sex. Just far enough to not get caught.
 
Big Tom said:
What's kinky sex to you? My first wife and I used to have fun showing her off in public, some light s/m & b/d. Being in NYC there's some nice clubs here. My question is do most people like this sort of thing or is it too kinky. :lol:
Click to expand...

I thought s/m and b/d were normal.
 
Kinky= one man, one woman, a donkey and a midget clown. Oh yeah, and a horribly handicapped polar bear. Now thats kinky!
 
Big Tom said:
What's kinky sex to you? My first wife and I used to have fun showing her off in public, some light s/m & b/d. Being in NYC there's some nice clubs here. My question is do most people like this sort of thing or is it too kinky. :lol:
Click to expand...

 
Erotic is using a feather. Kinky is using the whole chicken.
 
A shower-curtain and a can of Crisco.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom