KBJ Should be Rejected by Any Self Respecting Woke Democrat

[MaryP]

Meanwhile, in the written questions portion of the process, Ted Cruz harrassed the shit out of her. 240 questions?

The 240 written questions that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz posed for the judge also came with six paragraphs of instructions for how she should approach answering his inquiries; his directive that she not cross-reference answers provided in other questions was ignored.

What is the matter with this man?

Jackson cites Scalia and Barrett as she navigates GOP senators' written questions

Over the span of 330 pages, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson responded to hundreds of written questions from Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans

www.cnn.com

 

[code1211]

Irrelevant. I'm talking about the whacked-out conspiracy believing Trump cult.

Why?

 

[Jay59]

I understand that.

However, pretending to be something does not convert that pretense into a reality.

I can dress up like Spiderman, but I will not be able to shoot webs that will stop a racing truck. It is only make believe.

The guy who dresses up like a woman is not a woman.

The "wokesters" demand that we pretend with the people who wear a costume that they are the character they pretend to be.

No one said it was reality. I said it was a way to exploit a loophole.

Dressing like Spiderman may not make you Spiderman but it could help you blend in at a ComiCon, which has always been true. The movement wants to add a layer of legal protection to anyone in costume.

 

[Cardinal]

Why should it matter to you what words I use?

Because I want to know what it means to you.

 

[code1211]

Irrelevant. I'm talking about the whacked-out conspiracy believing Trump cult.

Why?

 

[code1211]

It seemed like they were wanting all the images and videos to take home for more "research" on the topic.

Are you guys actually in circle as you're doing this?

 

[Simpletruther]

Nah. I don't like her hair. Disqualify her for that

I hope you didn't waste too much time on the OP. She knows how to define woman. And she knows not to take the bait.

I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!

The republicans dropped the ball hard by not following up with asking her if a trans woman like lie Thomas was a woman.

She would have been caught hard with that question.

 

[code1211]

Really? How about 1/6? Do you think that too much attention is being placed on that and not enough on those BLM thugs who got away with everything?

I think the exact same actions are being presented by lying propagandists differently based only on the political lean of the media presenters.

 

[code1211]

Sure - this for example is not only a lie, it's a batshit crazy post. Would you like to see another one?

That you are incapable of understanding the world around you says nothing about me.

That said, sure, post another one.

 

[code1211]

Oh, here you are denying your buddy, trump's criminality. Would you like to see another one of your crazy posts?

I asked a question.

You have assumed many things, but did not answer my question.

Do you know the answer? If you do, please produce your source. If you do not, why embarrass yourself like this?

 

[Razoo]

I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!

you are out to lunch and out of touch

 

[code1211]

Meanwhile, in the written questions portion of the process, Ted Cruz harrassed the shit out of her. 240 questions?

The 240 written questions that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz posed for the judge also came with six paragraphs of instructions for how she should approach answering his inquiries; his directive that she not cross-reference answers provided in other questions was ignored.

What is the matter with this man?

Jackson cites Scalia and Barrett as she navigates GOP senators' written questions

Over the span of 330 pages, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson responded to hundreds of written questions from Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans

www.cnn.com

Seems like he's performing his due diligence.

Isn't that what the process is intended to do?

Would you prefer that he make up a rape fantasy and hire lying butt holes to participate by perjuring themselves?

 

[code1211]

No one said it was reality. I said it was a way to exploit a loophole.

Dressing like Spiderman may not make you Spiderman but it could help you blend in at a ComiCon, which has always been true. The movement wants to add a layer of legal protection to anyone in costume.

The loophole being exploited is a dangerous one for various reasons.

Voluntarily joining people in a shred fantasy is one thing. Being forced to accept a Big Lie or be subjected to punishment for not accepting that Big Lie is not that one thing.

 

[code1211]

Because I want to know what it means to you.

The term homo sapien means, TO ME, modern day people.

What does it mean to you?

 

[Cardinal]

The term homo sapien means, TO ME, modern day people.

What does it mean to you?

Define “modern.”

And no cheating. Don’t use a dictionary.

 

[Liberal7360]

I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!

So you want one of the most qualified candidates for the Supreme Court rejected because she wouldn't play the gender game with a republican?

Personally, I'm more interested in her rulings as a judge than a stupid gotcha question asked by a stupid republican.

Who cares about gender rolls?

This nation is facing a lot of difficulties and you only care about gender rolls.

Why do you even care about transgender people? Why can't you just mind your own business and live and let live?

Transgender people aren't hurting you or anyone else yet you want to persecute them and want to deny one of the most qualified candidates to the Supreme Court over stupid gender words?

Grow up and come into the 21st century.

Guess what? She will be confirmed and will be a judge on our Supreme Court.

The fact that you don't like it doesn't matter to anyone.

Deal with it.

 

[poweRob]

Are you guys actually in circle as you're doing this?

As I'm doing what @code1211?

 

[lurchadams]

I asked a question.

You have assumed many things, but did not answer my question.

Do you know the answer? If you do, please produce your source. If you do not, why embarrass yourself like this?

You don't want an answer from me. You're dodge and talk about how "the libs are destroying America". You asked me for examples, I gave them to you.

It is obviously YOU who are embarrassed. Trumpist projection.

 

[lurchadams]

That you are incapable of understanding the world around you says nothing about me.

That said, sure, post another one.

LOL - it is you who is part of the trumpist hate cabal, my friend. I understand the world just fine. I understand you feel anyone with whom you disagree is a "stinky lib" and must be put in their place.

 

[lurchadams]

I think the exact same actions are being presented by lying propagandists differently based only on the political lean of the media presenters.

LOL TOTAL DODGE!!!!

 

[code1211]

The republicans dropped the ball hard by not following up with asking her if a trans woman like lie Thomas was a woman.

She would have been caught hard with that question.

What was revealed was less about the nominee and more about the lying thief asking the questions.

The interrogator was reading copy that she did not understand and the answer, even though perfect for the interrogator's purpose, was ignored.

I watched a commentator once recounting an interview he conducted with a hated subject. An answer was given that was an obvious opening to a current events topic.

He could have "hit it out of the park" by asking the next, obvious question. However, he missed entirely. The hanging curve floated past him.

When asked by his editor as they watched the raw video together for the first time why he didn't ask the next, obvious, question based on the response, he had to admit that nobody had written it down for him.

When you hear something that's unexpected and you need a second to think, just say, "That's interesting. Could you expand on that?" While they are "expanding", you can catch your breath and ask the question begging to be asked.

Unless, of course, you are simply devoid of any sort of useful knowledge and don't know what you're talking about at all. Like the interrogator in this example.

 

[code1211]

you are out to lunch and out of touch

I rarely eat lunch.

I am out of touch. Hopelessly.

I didn't watch the Grammies. I'm pretty sure I never heard of any of the winners.

 

[code1211]

Define “modern.”

And no cheating. Don’t use a dictionary.

People are people wherever you go. It is they that I am speaking of.

Why are you so consumed by this idiocy? (This is not a trick question).

 

[code1211]

So you want one of the most qualified candidates for the Supreme Court rejected because she wouldn't play the gender game with a republican?

Personally, I'm more interested in her rulings as a judge than a stupid gotcha question asked by a stupid republican.

Who cares about gender rolls?

This nation is facing a lot of difficulties and you only care about gender rolls.

Why do you even care about transgender people? Why can't you just mind your own business and live and let live?

Transgender people aren't hurting you or anyone else yet you want to persecute them and want to deny one of the most qualified candidates to the Supreme Court over stupid gender words?

Grow up and come into the 21st century.

Guess what? She will be confirmed and will be a judge on our Supreme Court.

The fact that you don't like it doesn't matter to anyone.

Deal with it.

Regarding the highlight: The entire Democrat party, all of the divisionist idiot whackos that support the divisionist Democrats and the moronic fools who think that "Gender Roles" are important.

This nominee agree with me. Biology is what defines genders.

 

[Cardinal]

People are people wherever you go. It is they that I am speaking of.

Why are you so consumed by this idiocy? (This is not a trick question).

Still waiting on that definition.