• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

KBJ Should be Rejected by Any Self Respecting Woke Democrat

code1211

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
47,695
Reaction score
10,466
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
 

JasperL

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
58,487
Reaction score
27,454
Location
Tennessee
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
Why are you spewing Republikkkan party dogma?
 

Credence

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
6,437
Reaction score
7,099
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent
Nah. I don't like her hair. Disqualify her for that

I hope you didn't waste too much time on the OP. She knows how to define woman. And she knows not to take the bait.
Correct. The only reason she did not define woman was because of the direction the questions were going and she knew once she defined woman, Blackburn was going to bring up transgenders. Smart move by Jackson - she saw right through it

I really wish people would stick to threads already posted. This has been brought up ad nauseum
 

OrphanSlug

A sinister place...
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
32,031
Reaction score
31,000
Location
Atlanta
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Useless thread, and a key reason that modern liberalism has power for short stints only.
 

MamboDervish

Looking Forward
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
10,748
Reaction score
10,297
Location
The Big Apple
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
Your entire post is a sad joke. The American public saw right through the kabuki theater of the GOP extremists, especially bullshit questions like the one you posed above. I can't even begin to imagine the breadth and depth of the faux outrage from the right if Brett Kavanaugh had been asked what the definition of a man was during his congressional hearings. They'd still be screaming on top of their lungs.

Your reach has far exceeded your grasp.
 

BlueTex

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
40,114
Reaction score
30,281
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
Should I go ahead and order tissues for you for when she is sworn in?

All the bullshit in the world isn't going to stop her confirmation.... Probably better to spend your time praying Thomas survives the scrutiny his ethics violation.... Perhaps we will see the second impeachment of a supreme court justice...
 

Callen

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
21,352
Reaction score
22,247
Location
Canada
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
When all you got is her very smart answer to a dumb question....you know just how good she is. What has happened to American politics is so darn sad?
 

Gateman_Wen

Official disruptive influence
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
17,315
Reaction score
17,809
Location
Middle of it all
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
who os "KBJ"?
 

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
281,619
Reaction score
100,383
Location
Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
What I got most from the KBJ's hearings is how intimately familiar the republicans are with child pornography.
true-Biden has been on the public stage for decades
 

code1211

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
47,695
Reaction score
10,466
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Your entire post is a sad joke. The American public saw right through the kabuki theater of the GOP extremists, especially bullshit questions like the one you posed above. I can't even begin to imagine the breadth and depth of the faux outrage from the right if Brett Kavanaugh had been asked what the definition of a man was during his congressional hearings. They'd still be screaming on top of their lungs.

Your reach has far exceeded your grasp.

In what way would a biologist define what a woman might be?

A biologist would define "A Woman" as an adult human being with 2 X Chromosomes.

Why would anyone need a biologist to determine the gender of an adult if biology has no connection with the gender of an adult?
 

Jay59

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
15,070
Reaction score
3,199
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
Gender is defined by grammarians. It has to do with words. For example, hers is the female-gendered possessive pronoun. Using gender as you are doing is inaccurate and confusing.

The term woman is defined by biology, so the prospective Supreme Court Justice is correct.

In what way would a biologist define what a woman might be?

A biologist would define "A Woman" as an adult human being with 2 X Chromosomes.

Why would anyone need a biologist to determine the gender of an adult if biology has no connection with the gender of an adult?
This is a better point. Ketanji Brown Jackson is being evasive.
 

911Sparky

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
5,556
Reaction score
4,708
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
true-Biden has been on the public stage for decades
I can't help but wonder why Barret wasn't asked that question by republicans, certainly she would be able to come up with a good answer.
Or, could it be Blackburn's question was just bait to draw KBJ into a transgender discussion?
 

code1211

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
47,695
Reaction score
10,466
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Should I go ahead and order tissues for you for when she is sworn in?

All the bullshit in the world isn't going to stop her confirmation.... Probably better to spend your time praying Thomas survives the scrutiny his ethics violation.... Perhaps we will see the second impeachment of a supreme court justice...

Are you saying, then, that facts from biology are all that should determine what is a woman and what is not a woman?
 

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
281,619
Reaction score
100,383
Location
Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
I can't help but wonder why Barret wasn't asked that question by republicans, certainly she would be able to come up with a good answer.
Or, could it be Blackburn's question was just bait to draw KBJ into a transgender discussion?
the crap with dudes swimming in girls events is going to be before the USSC in the near future
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2021
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
3,314
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
No self respecting liberal will listen to zero credibility traitor trolls and their nonsense lies
 

BlueTex

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
40,114
Reaction score
30,281
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Are you saying, then, that facts from biology are all that should determine what is a woman and what is not a woman?
I’m saying it was a stupid question to pander to idiots.
 
Top Bottom