- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 47,695
- Reaction score
- 10,467
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.
When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.
BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.
Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.
Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.
This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.
BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.
Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.
Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.
This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!