• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

KBJ Should be Rejected by Any Self Respecting Woke Democrat

code1211 said:
With regard to the two highlighted ideas in your thought here, Cadbury and Gertrude Stein are both rarely cited as sources of legal definition.

Cadbury, though, presents the bunny and the chicken to show that one is NOT the other. The message they offer is that one is trying to fool people to believe that which is not real. So... There's that.

I have no problem with anyone doing anything that is not hurtful to anyone else.

I saw a picture of a person who appeared to be a biological male wearing a skirt short enough to leave his buttocks exposed along with stiletto heels and a tank top. Facebook is stunning at times.

Fashion sense aside, if he is a biological male wearing women's clothes, is he a female or is he a man wearing women's clothes? Do actual facts have any bearing on any conclusion regarding gender rising from this?

If being a biologist is the only accreditation that allows recognized differentiation of genders, then it would seem to follow that this differentiation be based on biological considerations.
Click to expand...
This is my major problem with the whole subjecxt. It is no stretch to believe someone would assume an opposite-sex role with malicious intent.
 
code1211 said:
I FEEL that this is an actual question since the folks who consider it to be an issue consider it to be an issue.

Democrats have decided that this is an issue. They have used this issue as a cudgel to abuse people.

The point that is at question in this thread is pretty simple:

KBJ implied that only a biologist could define what a "woman" is.

IF being educated and accredited as a biologist is the only qualification that enables this determination, THEN, obviously, in her eyes, only biological determinations may be applied to make this determination.

An adult male, that is an adult person with an x and y chromosome in their DNA, is a male regardless of whether or not THEY are dressed up like a girl or approved to swim in the girl's division.
Click to expand...
Not even a tsunami of after-the-fact bullshit ^^^^ can obscure the simple truth, which is that KBJ gave a perfectly reasonable response to what was an infantile set-up question that should never have been asked.
 
code1211 said:
You seem pleased.
Click to expand...
Usually I am quite pleased, thanks for noticing, but that is not to say I was pleased specifically in regards the seeming incomprehensibility, by you, of my simple and strait-forward postings.
 
Jay59 said:
This is my major problem with the whole subjecxt. It is no stretch to believe someone would assume an opposite-sex role with malicious intent.
Click to expand...

Intent aside, what is real is real.

What is imagined is imagined.

Folks on the Left end of the political spectrum seem to be possessed by that which is imagined.
 
code1211 said:
Intent aside, what is real is real.

What is imagined is imagined.

Folks on the Left end of the political spectrum seem to be possessed by that which is imagined.
Click to expand...
Yes, trump fans hate us when we believe our lying eyes and ears :) Tell us some more about how "today's left is destroying this nation"?

You guys are adorable :)
 
craig said:
“Putin ain't woke,” Bannon said. “He's anti-woke.” “The Russian people still know which bathroom to use,”
swarajyamag.com

President Putin Goes ‘Anti-Woke’, Says Western Civilisation Is One Step From Falling

Putin argued that many global governance institutions need “fine tuning” as they failed to tackle the challenges posed by the dynamics of global processes.
swarajyamag.com
Click to expand...

It's difficult to understand from you link what you are hinting at.

Does Putin agree with the SCOTUS nominee that gender of any person is a determination that can only be made by a biologist?
 
MamboDervish said:
Not even a tsunami of after-the-fact bullshit ^^^^ can obscure the simple truth, which is that KBJ gave a perfectly reasonable response to what was an infantile set-up question that should never have been asked.
Click to expand...

So you agree that gender is a matter of biology.

Me, too.
 
LouC said:
Usually I am quite pleased, thanks for noticing, but that is not to say I was pleased specifically in regards the seeming incomprehensibility, by you, of my simple and strait-forward postings.
Click to expand...

I'm glad you're pleased.
 
code1211 said:
It's difficult to understand from you link what you are hinting at.

Does Putin agree with the SCOTUS nominee that gender of any person is a determination that can only be made by a biologist?
Click to expand...
He agrees with you that using the meme "woke" provokes cultural divisions.
 
Jay59 said:
This is my major problem with the whole subjecxt. It is no stretch to believe someone would assume an opposite-sex role with malicious intent.
Click to expand...
Transgender people are vastly more likely to be a victim of the crimes that right wingers are worried about rather than the perpetrator.
 
code1211 said:
Intent aside, what is real is real. What is imagined is imagined.
Click to expand...
And what is faked is faked. There is nothing stopping a sexual predator from accessing opposite-sex facilities.

code1211 said:
Folks on the Left end of the political spectrum seem to be possessed by that which is imagined.
Click to expand...
Superficial over substantive is a common theme in this forum.

Deuce said:
Transgender people are vastly more likely to be a victim of the crimes that right wingers are worried about rather than the perpetrator.
Click to expand...
Read what I said again. I never claimed a transgender person was even involved.
 
Jay59 said:
Read what I said again. I never claimed a transgender person was even involved.
Click to expand...
Someone pretending to be transgender, then, so your real danger is not trans people, it's cisgender people deciding to be criminals.
 
Jay59 said:
… It is no stretch to believe someone would assume an opposite-sex role with malicious intent.
Click to expand...
Only a twisted anti-trans nut would consider doing so.
 
Deuce said:
Someone pretending to be transgender, then, so your real danger is not trans people, it's cisgender people deciding to be criminals.
Click to expand...
That's a lot of obscure verbiages to say that it is a loophole that can be exploited.

RaleBulgarian said:
Only a twisted anti-trans nut would consider doing so.
Click to expand...
What planet are you on?

On Earth, ordinary pedophiles and voyeurs might seek the opportunity to enter an opposite-sex restroom.
 
lurchadams said:
It is for today's Republican. That's all they have - conspiracy theories and culture wars. Republicans can't lead.
Click to expand...

So now reality is "conspiracy theories and culture wars"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom