- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 113,071
- Reaction score
- 60,703
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
And I was pointing out that your example doesn't fit because of the propensity of actual harm to occur, which is the reason that limit on speech is in place, does not exist in simply making threatening speech. :shrug:
Which has exactly nothing to do with the point I was trying to make, which is that words have to be considered in context.