- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
We know that, but Libbos can't fathom that reality.
You do know that every black and white person in the USA is a separate human being with their own life to live outside of the group that they belong to, eh?
You don't think officer Wilson was carrying out his duties as assigned on the day this incident happened? I do. You may, the court may, public opinion may, determine that he was negligent in carrying out those duties, but there's zero doubt he was working at that time. If he robbed a liquor store and shot Brown in the process, we wouldn't be talking about support among the police force for their member.
One would hope the DOJ would follow this sage advice, but not under this Attorney General and President.
No, I can't control the irrational behaviour of protestors nor the racial animus they have in their hearts. Nor do I expect to bow to that irrational behaviour nor that racial animus. You may want to, I don't.
Nothing like stereotyping the entire crowd with negative stereotypes to show your impartiality and reasoned analysis of the evidence.... I'd respond but there is no real point. You're clearly not interested in looking at the issue objectively.
So the people in charge have approved officers taping over their name tags? I'd like to see the evidence for that?
If you can find it, it's more evidence the person in charge is an idiot and should be fired.
:doh
Bs.
It is not provocation.
The namebands are provocation in a situation that doesn't need it. Neither are they part of the uniform, so should not be worn on duty.
He's so obviously guilty its crazy. You would have to be a moron to believe his story...
For example why wasn't the kids Freind jailed for going for a cops gun?!?!!?
Its gonna be the Zimmerman trial all over.... A obvious racist walks in a obviously racist part of the country...
Plus the kid hit the ground n put his hands up!!!
Can the bs. I didn't stereotype them, they did that to themselves.Nothing like stereotyping the entire crowd with negative stereotypes to show your impartiality and reasoned analysis of the evidence....
:dohYou're clearly not interested in looking at the issue objectively.
And there is that bias and lack of impartiality again.So the people in charge have approved officers taping over their name tags? I'd like to see the evidence for that?
If you can find it, it's more evidence the person in charge is an idiot and should be fired.
Given the inflamed situation there it couldn't be anything else but calculated.
When you say, "stereotype an entire crowd", are you including the accusation that every cop on the FPD is a racist?
Valid concerns are one thing, invalid concerns are another.You've obviously decided who the bad guys are and it's the black community of Ferguson, and so their concerns can't be valid and Brown must have deserved killing, which is why the cops abandoning any pretense of objectivity, while on duty in uniform, while serving this community, is no big deal. I can't have a reasoned debate with that viewpoint.
Who made that accusation? If anyone has, I'll join you in calling them an idiot. I sure haven't made that allegation. It was Excon who personally insulted an entire community protesting with "Pants up, don't loot."
Who made that accusation? If anyone has, I'll join you in calling them an idiot. I sure haven't made that allegation. It was Excon who personally insulted an entire community protesting with "Pants up, don't loot."
What is a Libbo? That word isn't in the dictionary.
If that's your only point, he was working at the time he shot Brown, OK, fine, he was working. Glad we got that straightened out.
Employees of the DOJ have said in public that they're taking Michael Brown's side in this against Wilson? Can you quote anyone on that?
I think I'm done with this topic. You've obviously decided who the bad guys are and it's the black community of Ferguson, and so their concerns can't be valid and Brown must have deserved killing, which is why the cops abandoning any pretense of objectivity, while on duty in uniform, while serving this community, is no big deal. I can't have a reasoned debate with that viewpoint.
Wrong.Who made that accusation? If anyone has, I'll join you in calling them an idiot. I sure haven't made that allegation. It was Excon who personally insulted an entire community protesting with "Pants up, don't loot."
I think the Ferguson are excercising their 1st Amendment rights anf the DOJ needs to STFU.
Anyone who is provoked by those wristbands has problems that need to be addressed.
Read the thread. There are plenty.
Anyone who is provoked by those wristbands has problems that need to be addressed.
If it's the entire community looting and disturbing the peace, the entire community deserves to be insulted thusly.
Prove itOnly the police department are wearing them. None of the outside agencies brought in to keep the peace are doing so.
An allegation.The department are also neglecting to wear or covering up their name bands.
No it doesn't.This indicates a mentality of impunity toward the community they are supposed to be serving.
You need to stop telling untruths.And obviously the entire community wasn't looting. Much of that community condemned the looting.
There is no telling what you mean by "disturbing the peace" - it's generic enough to include peaceful protest of any kind anywhere, as well as violent protests. But Excon didn't say disturbing the peace, he said "Pants up, don't LOOT."
Spare us the false info. The potestors are not looking at the same evidnce.The protesters, looking at the same partial evidence and their incomplete knowledge of it have come to a different conclusion.....
They are only looking at and considering the false narrative that was initially spread. They haven't looked at all of the known evidence.
They went with the false claims of his hands were up surrendering, and that he was executed. Crying hands up don't shoot. Which should receive the response, "Pants up don't loot".
Wrong.It was Excon who personally insulted an entire community protesting with "Pants up, don't loot."
You can not show that comment was directed at anybody but the protestors it applied to. You know, those who were protesting by looting.
You need articles and pictures to accompany the claim?
August 18, 2014 3:10 PM
‘Pants Up, Don’t Loot’
Protests devolve into violence and mayhem in Ferguson.
By Ryan Lovelace
Ferguson, Mo. — “Hands up. Don’t shoot,” several protesters chanted on Sunday night.Pants up, Don’t loot.™ | National Review Online
One voice shouted in response, “Pants up. Don’t loot.”
The request went unnoticed.
[...]
http://tactical****.com/pants-up-dont-loot/
So stop with the false assertions.
Credit to carterzest at The Conservative Treeehouse for that icon.
Prove it
An allegation.
No it doesn't.
It shows they want to protect themselves and family from untoward attention from the idiotic demonstrators who want to act out violently against them.
:dohThe DoJ wrote a previous letter about the name badges (a uniform requirement to ensure accountability) Then they had to write again about the inflammatory "defiant" wristbands (essentially saying "**** you" to the public they serve!)
The department is out of control, or it would enforce uniform regulations without needing to be told from outside.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?