Or maybe the Russians - who have been trying to infiltrate Signal - helped the editor/reporter gain access.
You believe in crystal balls? That’s an idiotic post, backatcha on the nice day!
He's not doing that either but, as always, it's your world and the rest f us just live here.
Yep, plenty of American whiskey sitting on the shelves with no place to go thanks to Trump's tariffs and threat of tariffs...
Sure, he's grabbing the power of the purse. Remember, he's Executive Ordering his way around monies allocated by the Legislative Branch.
The multi-billion dollar encrypted comms system the US government has designed just for this purpose. The government builds and maintains a SCIF for every one of these principles just for this type of thing.
| SCIF | |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Protect sensitive information from unauthorized access |
| Location | Federal buildings, military installations, embassies, and government contracting offices |
| Security | Reinforced doors, walls, and floors, soundproofing, and motion sensors |
| Access | Limited to those with the appropriate security clearance |
| Electronics | Most electronics are banned, but cell phone detectors are often used |
| Types | Fixed, temporary, and mobile |
...then why did the Pentagon state commercial apps like Signal should not be used?From this morning: The Democrats shit show
Wednesday, March 26
Gabbard, Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel are among officials appearing before the House Intelligence Committee to discuss global threats to the U.S. The hearing was scheduled before The Atlantic’s revelations.
“I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information,” Ratcliffe said. “It was permissible to do so. I didn’t transfer any classified information.”
Like Joe Biden's garage, Trump's chandelier bathroom or Hillary Clinton's storage room on Martha's Vineyard?Oh, I dunno. Maybe a special secure room where these types of conversations can take place?
That's how I felt about Aileen Cannon.
You mean the same crooked judge who ruled in favor of Clinton information the FBI discovered be released and the one who was lenient on J6 rioters?
How did they help create it when administration officials were the ones who inadvertently invited him and made this a story?
Of course this has to be the most logical explanation, because there's no way the same folks who had to retract claims of fraud numerous times because they got it all wrong could never make that mistake. "The Democrats forced Waltz to add a phone number he did not recognize to the chat!" Makes perfect sense.
Indeed. Had they done so from the start, they wouldn't have used Signal to begin with since the Pentagon said that was a no-no and avoided this mess.
That doesn't necessarily follow. He doesn't have to be in on the incompetence he is reporting on. The story here is top level government officials added him to a chat he should never have been a part of; that is a news story. Or, are you in favor of the news media not report these things in order to protect the government?
This judge just got the nod from the appeals court in the deportation case.
How 'bout the backroom at the Wild Orchid.
Your argument is that, when someone breaks the law, our judges should not be able to do anything about it.
