• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge targeted by Trump is assigned to Signalgate lawsuit

The lawsuit brought by left leaning watchdog group, American Oversight:

The Hill

Flashback to 2017, when
@TheAtlantic
called Signal “the gold standard of encrypted messaging” — and admitted it was used by Obama and Hillary Clinton staffers.

The problem isn't with the security of Signal messages.
The problem was who was invited to the group chat.

That the left leaning watchdog group brought the law suit isn't a surprise, nor is that they filed their suit with this judge.

Should this judge want to demonstrate his integrity, he's recuse himself for reasons of bias, which he's already demonstrated, so we'll see if he does.

 

From this morning: The Democrats shit show​

Wednesday, March 26​



Gabbard, Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel are among officials appearing before the House Intelligence Committee to discuss global threats to the U.S. The hearing was scheduled before The Atlantic’s revelations.
“I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information,” Ratcliffe said. “It was permissible to do so. I didn’t transfer any classified information.”​
It's Biden's fault. You can post the tweet of Leavitt's presser when it comes out.

IT'S THAT BIDEN!!!

👊🇺🇸🔥

🙏🙏🙏
 
The problem isn't with the security of Signal messages.
The problem was who was invited to the group chat.

That the left leaning watchdog group brought the law suit isn't a surprise, nor is that they filed their suit with this judge.

Should this judge want to demonstrate his integrity, he's recuse himself for reasons of bias, which he's already demonstrated, so we'll see if he does.

The crooked judge won't recuse himself because he's part of the scam to bring Trump's people down. He'll take his sweet time with this.
Also, the Democrats and their crooked legacy media will keep this fiasco, they no doubt helped to create, alive until after the midterms. I have no doubt the Democrats found someone who is responsible for illegally adding creepy boy, Democrat Goldberg's name to the chat. Who else would do this but them? Yeah, there's a conspiracy. The Trump administration should now go over everything they say and do with a fine-toothed comb. Also, Goldberg should have told the powers that be that his name was added in error to a chat two days before the actual chat began. Why didn't he? He was in on it.
 
Last edited:
Fast forward eight years…..

8 years ago is eons in open source development time.

While it may have been judged as having vulnerabilities 8 years ago, that doesn't mean that's still true today, nor in in 2017, where it appears to have been 'called Signal “the gold standard of encrypted messaging” — and admitted it was used by Obama and Hillary Clinton staffers.'
 
8 years ago is eons in open source development time.

While it may have been judged as having vulnerabilities 8 years ago, that doesn't mean that's still true today, nor in in 2017, where it appears to have been 'called Signal “the gold standard of encrypted messaging” — and admitted it was used by Obama and Hillary Clinton staffers.'
What is the parent organization of the NSA?

Read the link maybe.
 
Who is in charge of popping the popcorn?
Since i'm in Tennessee, i'll supply the booze. Plenty of distilleries here.
Yeah, it’s not going north….
 
Trump is the one who is "cutting Congress out of the equation entirely" with his grab of the power of the purse.
Yes, he is, and this is ABSOLUTE GROUNDS for him to be impeached.
 

From this morning: The Democrats shit show​

Wednesday, March 26​



Gabbard, Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel are among officials appearing before the House Intelligence Committee to discuss global threats to the U.S. The hearing was scheduled before The Atlantic’s revelations.
“I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information,” Ratcliffe said. “It was permissible to do so. I didn’t transfer any classified information.”​
He's lying.

That app IS NOT APPROVED for sharing information that is not meant for the public. Classified or otherwise.
 
About this hack............. Be sure and click on "Show more"

"Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, has a track record of journalistic failures that undermine his credibility. Here are his five greatest missteps..."

 
The real problem for our nation's national security is how the hell a well-known anti-Trump political hack's name was added to a high-level government group chat. Who did this? Was this done during the Biden administration as an attempt to set Trump's people up? I put nothing past the slimy Democrats. Nothing.
The Dems have earned and deserve every bit of that skepticism.
 
The crooked judge won't recuse himself because he's part of the scam to bring Trump's people down. He'll take his sweet time with this.
In my mind I'm not ready to declare the judge as crooked.
It is pretty clear that he's biased against the administration, OK, fine. In my mind that poses a legitimate reason for the judge to recuse himself, of accept the expected administration's request for a reassignment.

Also, the Democrats and their crooked legacy media will keep this fiasco, they no doubt helped to create, alive until after the midterms. I have no doubt the Democrats found someone who is responsible for illegally adding creepy boy, Democrat Goldberg's name to the chat. Who else would do this but them? Yeah, there's a conspiracy. The Trump administration should now go over everything they say and do with a fine-toothed comb.
All this yet to be determined and made public, from my view.

Also, Goldberg should have told the powers that be that his name was added in error to a chat two days before the actual chat began. Why didn't he? He was in on it.
Meh. He's a journalist, and who wouldn't accept something like this which fell into his lap?
 
What is the parent organization of the NSA?
This has no bearing on what I posted:

"8 years ago is eons in open source development time.​
While it may have been judged as having vulnerabilities 8 years ago, that doesn't mean that's still true today, nor in in 2017"​

Both are accurate statements.

Read the link maybe.
 
In my mind I'm not ready to declare the judge as crooked.
It is pretty clear that he's biased against the administration, OK, fine. In my mind that poses a legitimate reason for the judge to recuse himself, of accept the expected administration's request for a reassignment.


All this yet to be determined and made public, from my view.


Meh. He's a journalist, and who wouldn't accept something like this which fell into his lap?
Don’t swim against the tide now…..
 
About this hack............. Be sure and click on "Show more"

"Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, has a track record of journalistic failures that undermine his credibility. Here are his five greatest missteps..."


Here's an idea...

Don't invite the hack to the secret meeting.
 
This is good. Boasberg can now find all parties guilty and remove the entire Trump administration. This is the way the Constitution is supposed to work! If a district judge isn't allowed to dissolve the sitting administration then we simply don't have a democracy.
Get a grip, dude. It's a lawsuit. Not a motion for impeachment. :ROFLMAO:
 
Trump is the one who is "cutting Congress out of the equation entirely" with his grab of the power of the purse.
How the **** is Trump "cutting congress out of the equation" if he just had his department heads there testifying today? Where do you people come up with this insanity?
 
Only a political hack would publish messages from a group chat they knew they didn't belong on.
He's the Democrats' biggest hero.
Only a ****ing political liability would put a so called "political hack" into a chat about government secrets AND NOT ****ING KNOW IT.
Jesus wept, I know how bad this is for Trumpco based on the amount of bullshit you are spamming in this thread alone.
 
How the **** is Trump "cutting congress out of the equation" if he just had his department heads there testifying today? Where do you people come up with this insanity?
He's been cutting Congress out by grabbing its power of the purse.
 
Back
Top Bottom