- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 133,228
- Reaction score
- 31,118
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
And that's a strawman. No one is claiming that's science. That's what makes it a strawman. You invented that talking point out of thin air.
Why go to someone with medical knowledge and training for your medical issues when you could just ask a ****ing commoner. That's some kind of sense....
There is no science that proves that a biological male that thinks he is a biological woman or woman in general... is a biological woman or woman in general.
You haven't. I'm straight up telling you you haven't because you have yet to provide evidence of any so called supporters of this bad science.Incorrect. I directly answered your claim.
You haven't. I'm straight up telling you you haven't because you have yet to provide evidence of any so called supporters of this bad science.
And I answered:Why go to someone with medical knowledge and training for your medical issues
There is no science that proves that a biological male that thinks he is a biological woman
Who said that's the science me or anyone else is talking about? That's what makes your argument a strawman. It's almost like you don't understand what a strawman is.....You said:
And I answered:
Meaning going to a person with medical knowledge and training for your medical issues is nonsensical because there is no science blah blah...
I made the claim that people go to the medically trained to deal with their medical issues. They don't ask the common joe they pass on their commute to treat their cancer. If you think the knowledge to dispense medical care is common knowledge and not highly specified knowledge they present to me all the commoners with medical practices.You made a general claim with no evidence and I answered it directly and in kind. That is not a Straw Man.
,
8th amendment apparently does not agree with you, or the State of Indiana.If the murdering prick wants to turn himself in a woman, he better pony up the mullah for it. And the ACLU deserves nothing but ridicule for defending this idiot.
A federal district judge in Indiana has once again ordered the state Department of Correction (IDOC) to arrange a sex reassignment surgery for a transgender inmate convicted of reckless homicide of a baby, marking the latest development in the ongoing legal saga challenging an Indiana law banning the procedure.
The case, now in its second year, involves inmate Autumn Cordellioné's request for sex reassignment surgery. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) first filed the lawsuit against the Indiana Department of Corrections in 2023 on behalf of Cordellioné, challenging an Indiana law that prohibits the Department of Corrections from using taxpayer funds to cover sex reassignment surgeries for inmates. The ACLU argues the law is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of "cruel and unusual punishment."
Trans inmate in prison for killing baby must get gender surgery at 'earliest opportunity': judge
An Indiana judge is mandating sex reassignment surgery for a transgender inmate, extending the ongoing legal challenge to a state law banning the procedure.www.foxnews.com
Who said that's the science me or anyone else is talking about?
There is no science
That's what makes your argument a strawman. It's almost like you don't understand what a strawman is.....
I made the claim that people go to the medically trained to deal with their medical issues. They don't ask the common joe they pass on their commute to treat their cancer. If you think the knowledge to dispense medical care is common knowledge and not highly specified knowledge they present to me all the commoners with medical practices.
Right... you're arguing against science that no one else was talking about before you introduced it, hence the strawman. You really don't know what a strawman is, do you?Holy Cow...
I said:
I did not misrepresent your argument. Sorry if you don't understand the relevance of this. *shrug*
Irrelevant.
Right... you're arguing against science that no one else was talking about before you introduced it, hence the strawman.
You really don't know what a strawman is, do you?
You're arguing against the thing you introduced, not me. Hence the strawman. That's not the science I was talking about. Learn what a strawman is. This is getting embarrassing.Wrong.
I was not arguing against science.....
I argued that THERE IS NO SCIENCE
Keep telling yourself that...
b
You're arguing against the thing you introduced, not me.
Hence the strawman. That's not the science I was talking about. Learn what a strawman is. This is getting embarrassing.
Yep. It's how I know the thing you were calling science wasn't anything I was talking about.I am arguing against the thing I introduced? LOL Do you even read the shit you post?
Right. You made a statement about your own thing and pretended as if it had any relationship to what I was talking about. Hence, S.t.r.a.w.m.a.n.Who gives a Hell cares about what science you are talking about? I made an all-encompassing statement... no science.
Do you not understand absolute statements?
.
You made a statement about your own thing and pretended as if it had any relationship to what I was talking about. Hence, S.t.r.a.w.m.a.n.
It is a strawman because the thing you're saying I'm wrong about is not anything I was talking about. That is what makes it a strawman. My god man.Dude, a Strawman misrepresents what you said... I did not do that... not even close.
I essentially said that you are wrong. That... is not a Strawman.
It is a strawman because the thing you're saying I'm wrong about is not anything I was talking about. That is what makes it a strawman. My god man.
Are you asking me because you don't know?Is medicine not a science now, or something? LOL
You didn't accurately describe what I represent. That's what makes it a strawman. You made up something I wasn't arguing about and pretended I was wrong about it. We will keep going around and around for as long as you feel like constructing your arguments out of make believe.I did not misrepresent what you said.... I disagree with it.
That is not a Strawman... man, this will go on forever.
You are wrong.
End of story.
****ing hell, what a stupid argument.
,
Are you asking me because you don't know?
You didn't accurately describe what I represent. That's what makes it a strawman. You made up something I wasn't arguing about and pretended I was wrong about it. We will keep going around and around for as long as you feel like constructing your arguments out of make believe.
Yep.You like Pineapple on pizza?
Why is that? Describe that rational.That means that you don't trust the medical doctors.
What lies? Quote these incongruities.Look, I don't really give a shit if you want to be known as a person that posts lies... *shrug* LOL
Do your thing...
l
Based upon his rainbow fist, I am worried about what that might be.Do your thing...
l
Based upon his rainbow fist, I am worried about what that might be.
Yep.
Why is that? Describe that rational.
What lies? Quote these incongruities.
You can declare victory and run away, that's only going to amuse me further.That's right. Sorry... you have to be told things.
I won.
It is over. Sorry.
You will get another chance... maybe.
You can declare victory and run away, that's only going to amuse me further.
What you can't do is provide evidence of any of your claims about me or my argument.
I said you were running away because that's what it sounded like you were doing to me. You're really bad at this reading and understanding what it is are reading thing. How are you confused who said it when you quoted me saying it?Who said I was running away? Is that another example of your deficient comprehension skills?
Lost to what? Your strawman argument? Still haven't quite figured out what that is yet huh?Sorry mate... you lost. A while ago, actually.
Just wait patiently and you will get another chance... maybe.
You're really bad at this reading and understanding what it is are reading thing.
You're the one who's talking about your supposed victory rather than providing the evidence to your claims as I requested. If you feel trolled by being asked to prove yourself then that's on you.This trolling works on some, no doubt, weak as it is...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?