Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on Tru

[Moot]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

:doh "According to three intel sources to FNC..." Come on Moot, that question, and direction is disingenuous....

Come on yourself, j-mac...is this what you believe: "According to someone who got it from someone else who said they heard it from someone in some intel agency somewhere...."?


How do you verify hearsay, j-mac?

 

[Linc]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

This is not happening in a courthouse. The American people will decide about the evidence.

That they haven't seen and know is a libelous lie .

 

[Risky Thicket]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

don't know Governess...Just as we don't seem to know the sources of the Russian collusion claims....Right?

There haven't been any "claims" from the government. Y'all keep saying that. Is it that you don't understand, you haven't done the grunt work to stay current or you just hope the rest of us don't see it is as sophomoric attempt to spread disinformation and create fake news?

There are concerns. More than we likely know. Those concerns are being investigated. No government claims have been made.

 

[holbritter]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Source? Sure the source is www.j-macopinion.com

:funny

 

[j-mac]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Come on yourself, j-mac...is this what you believe: "According to someone who got it from someone else who said they heard it from someone who knew someone in some intel agency somewhere...."?


How do you verify hearsay, j-mac?

Good Grief....Do people even read anymore? Go back to the op and tell me where I said I believe it....I'll wait right here while you get that quote....

 

[vesper]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

The British version of the NSA is GCHQ. They don't have "agents." Nothing stinks here. No US agency may as a foreign service to do anything the US agency itself is prohibited from doing.

My reference to GCHQ was that NSA in describing Prism said they could share evidence with GCHQ and other spy organizations around the world. You don't think active spies in any government doesn't have access to such material? If so, I have a Carribean Island to sell you dirt cheap in Central Ohio.

 

[Linc]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

We've been studying the left's tactics....Oooops, sorry, "moderate" tactics....:lamo

I'll need to do a search to study Bannon's Alinsky Leninist techniques .

 

[apdst]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

No, you're wrong. It's just there's far more conspiracy theory and deflection on Trump's side of the field, so you see it come up more often. But investigate it all. It's high time we held some accountability upon government.

Since it still hasn't been proven that it was actually the Russians that hacked The DNC, much less any illegal connection between President Trump and the Russian government, Judge Napolitano's comments are just as credible. Probably more credible since we know that the information he's referring to actually exists. The Russian hacking accusation became a bit more dubious when it became public knowledge that the CIA can hack computers, disguised as Russian hackers.

Like I said in another thread: if this gains any momentum, the Democrats will go radio silence on the Russian brew-ha-ha.

 

[Risky Thicket]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Source? Sure the source is www.j-macopinion.com

Ass talk. How did I know that before I even asked?

 

[Jack Hays]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

My reference to GCHQ was that NSA in describing Prism said they could share evidence with GCHQ and other spy organizations around the world. You don't think active spies in any government doesn't have access to such material? If so, I have a Carribean Island to sell you dirt cheap in Central Ohio.

What in the world are you talking about?

 

[apdst]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Napolitano is one of the most unbelievable sources for anything in the world. He is a walking talking human piece of toilet tissue - use of course.

His extremism knows no bounds.

Judge Napolitano is Liberal approved.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

NO deflection at all. I am simply showing that I don't see you all upset that Hillary met with them as well. I find it a bit interesting.

Nothing has been presented or demonstrated that suggests her meeting might have been part of some collusion against the Trump campaign. I find it interesting that you're trying to make a false equivalency, and doing so very poorly.

Then you had better get that evidence to the FBI or CIA because they said they have no evidence. I find it interesting that you have evidence that the FBI or CIA do not.
Full Clapper: '''No Evidence''' of Collusion Between Trump and Russia - NBC News
so you are saying that you have more evidence than clapper? I am finding that hard to believe.

Huh. It's the oddest thing: ongoing investigations are supposed to gather evidence, which is likely what they're trying to do now, and they're irrelevant to what Clapper stated.

Several Investigations Underway on Trump-Russia Connections

You might consider staying a bit more current on such things.

yet you keep making them up so which is it?
both the FBI and CIA said there is no evidence.

so all this stuff you think is just make believe games.

Odd that you'd have to claim that I'm making things up when I've already show that not to be the case.

You're welcome to entertain your Fantasy Land scenarios all you'd like, but I'm simply not interested.

 

[vesper]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

What in the world are you talking about?

I am talking about when the Prism thingy was first implemented by the Obama administration in 2010. Do a search on Prism and Obama administration.

 

[apdst]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

The British spy on the US...and the US spy on the British and then they share information. That's how they avoid violating the laws about spying on their own citizens.

But...how often does a sitting United States President ask the Brits to spy on a presidential candidate? I bet that's a first!

Even Nixon kept it between us. :lamo

 

[Linc]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Ass talk. How did I know that before I even asked?

trump/Bannon republicans delaying the inevitable has GOP lawmakers quaking in their boots over the 2018s.

I hope they didn't see Bernie burn their asses in West Virginia last night .

 

[Jack Hays]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

I am talking about when the Prism thingy was first implemented by the Obama administration in 2010. Do a search on Prism and Obama administration.

I'm familiar with Prism. What do you think it has to do with the question in this thread?

 

[apdst]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Nothing has been presented or demonstrated that suggests her meeting might have been part of some collusion against the Trump campaign. I find it interesting that you're trying to make a false equivalency, and doing so very poorly.

Huh. It's the oddest thing: ongoing investigations are supposed to gather evidence, which is likely what they're trying to do now, and they're irrelevant to what Clapper stated.

Several Investigations Underway on Trump-Russia Connections

You might consider staying a bit more current on such things.

Odd that you'd have to claim that I'm making things up when I've already show that not to be the case.

You're welcome to entertain your Fantasy Land scenarios all you'd like, but I'm simply not interested.

Chris Coons says there is no evidence.

 

[Risky Thicket]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

But...how often does a sitting United States President ask the Brits to spy on a presidential candidate? I bet that's a first!

Even Nixon kept it between us. :lamo

Wrong question. You are being dishonest with yourself. I realize that might happen to you a lot. Let me see if I can help you be a little more objective.

I asked Vesper, she didn't answer. I'll ask you. Why do you suppose Trump might have been investigated during the Obama presidency?

 

[vesper]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

I'm familiar with Prism. What do you think it has to do with the question in this thread?

It opened up the door for Obama's administration to request digital records and content on any persons conversations without leaving a fingerprint by asking the English version of our NSA who has access to our data to glean all information without leaving an Obama fingerprint.

 

[Moot]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

But...how often does a sitting United States President ask the Brits to spy on a presidential candidate? I bet that's a first!

Even Nixon kept it between us. :lamo

I would say, never. Like the judge said...there are no fingerprints...so it's an allegation that can never be proven or disproved.

Just putting the false allegation out there is enough to fool half the people all the time. But to add legitimacy it helps to waste taxpayer dollars investigating the false allegations to find evidence to fit their theory.

 

[holbritter]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Wrong question. You are being dishonest with yourself. I realize that might happen to you a lot. Let me see if I can help you be a little more objective.

I asked Vesper, she didn't answer. I'll ask you. Why do you suppose Trump might have been investigated during the Obama presidency?

Because he said he was going to be a candidate?

 

[Tanngrisnir]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Chris Coons says there is no evidence.

In that case, you'd better immediately contact the FBI and Congress and get them to call off their current investigations!

 

[Jack Hays]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

It opened up the door for Obama's administration to request digital records and content on any persons conversations without leaving a fingerprint by asking the English version of our NSA who has access to our data to glean all information without leaving an Obama fingerprint.

NSA and GCHQ are extremely close but anything forbidden to NSA would be forbidden to GCHQ as well.

 

[Jack Hays]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Wrong question. You are being dishonest with yourself. I realize that might happen to you a lot. Let me see if I can help you be a little more objective.

I asked Vesper, she didn't answer. I'll ask you. Why do you suppose Trump might have been investigated during the Obama presidency?

There is no evidence he was.

 

[Tigerace117]

Re: Judge Napolitano: ‘Three Intel Sources’ Say Obama Looked to Brit Agency to Spy on

Your use of the word "other" suggests that I called Obama a dictator. Of course I did no such thing.

You implied he had "dictatorial tendencies". That's basically the same thing.