Wehrwolfen
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 402
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Ace:
Then: NO WAR! NO BLOOD FOR OIL! FIGHTING FOR PEACE IS LIKE F**ING FOR VIRGINITY!
Now: It’s all rather complicated! There are issues of international credibility to consider!
“What we saw in Syria last week should shock the conscience of the world,” said Kerry. “It defies any code of morality. Let me be clear: The indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, the killing of women and children and innocent bystanders by chemical weapons is a moral obscenity. By any standard, it is inexcusable. And despite the excuses and equivocations that some have manufactured, it is undeniable.”
I liked it better in the original Colinpowellese.
There is one difference between the two, of course:
Bush sought and received an authorization for the use of military force in Iraq from Congress, as the constitution requires. (I don’t really want to entertain the semantic argument favored by the Paulites that the piece of paper must specifically call itself a “Declaration of War.”)
Obama, of course, will be ordering US troops into harm’s way with out any such authority. He’ll do so based on his own authority.
Read more: John Kerry Makes the Case Perfectly for Going to War in Iraq in 2002
Source: John Kerry Makes the Case Perfectly for Going to War in Iraq in 2002 | Flopping Aces
Of course Kerry voted for the war in Iraq before he voted against it. Will he do the same now with Syria? And Americans wanted to boycott France.
Then: NO WAR! NO BLOOD FOR OIL! FIGHTING FOR PEACE IS LIKE F**ING FOR VIRGINITY!
Now: It’s all rather complicated! There are issues of international credibility to consider!
“What we saw in Syria last week should shock the conscience of the world,” said Kerry. “It defies any code of morality. Let me be clear: The indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, the killing of women and children and innocent bystanders by chemical weapons is a moral obscenity. By any standard, it is inexcusable. And despite the excuses and equivocations that some have manufactured, it is undeniable.”
I liked it better in the original Colinpowellese.
There is one difference between the two, of course:
Bush sought and received an authorization for the use of military force in Iraq from Congress, as the constitution requires. (I don’t really want to entertain the semantic argument favored by the Paulites that the piece of paper must specifically call itself a “Declaration of War.”)
Obama, of course, will be ordering US troops into harm’s way with out any such authority. He’ll do so based on his own authority.
Read more: John Kerry Makes the Case Perfectly for Going to War in Iraq in 2002
Source: John Kerry Makes the Case Perfectly for Going to War in Iraq in 2002 | Flopping Aces
Of course Kerry voted for the war in Iraq before he voted against it. Will he do the same now with Syria? And Americans wanted to boycott France.
Last edited: