• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jan 6 Select Committee Hearings - are you watching

I meeting isn't 'strong arming'. Get real.

Meeting to overturn an election lost by someone you fear will make of break you politically? Who are you kidding?
 
?? Who is crying? The purpose of Nancy's committee is clear. The testimony of these four officers set the course.
yes, it did
and a grateful nation thanks them for their continued service to our country
now, if only the neo-republicans could put nation before party
 
"Her circus" and you suggest folks using pejoratives can't discuss this topic rationally?
BTW- in case you didn't know, Pelosi had nothing to do with 1/6. She is not being investigated-at least as far as I know.
And there are plenty of folks on this board who want 1/6 investigated that do not pledge loyalty to Pelosi.
Is there anyone here who opposes this investigation that is not a Trump loyalist?

REASONS TO OPPOSE THE JAN. 6 COMMISSION:

a. You were part of the insurrection or gave aid & support

END OF LIST
 
I'm not a member of a "Cult" and I consider her panel to be a circus. Unprecedented in the 225+ years of the Congress.
Trumpers are victims of a disinformation campaign waged by Putin and other internet troll threats to Democracies around the world. Pelosi is merely head of the House at the moment. She is vilified by the disinformation spread about her, just as they are vilifying vaccines.
Nah. There was been plenty of violent attacks on the Capitol.

When has there been an invasion of the Capitol based on a lie by a loser of the election?
 
Attaboy. Thanks for the honesty.
So you think we should just can the investigations because they may make your orange god look bad? You and rest of MAGA world. We ought to just quit bickering about all this. The committee's work will proceed no matter what obstruction it gets from republicans. Violent insurrectionists will continue to be charged and jailed.

Think of it this way. If the probe finds out that no one in Trumps world had any responsibility for the riot, it should be a major win for you.

It seems the way you're defending Trump and crew and trashing the committee, you must already know Trump is guilty as hell. Otherwise you wouldn't be fighting it so hard.
 
"Her circus" and you suggest folks using pejoratives can't discuss this topic rationally?
pejoratives to refer to other posters here. But you knew that.
BTW- in case you didn't know, Pelosi had nothing to do with 1/6. She is not being investigated-at least as far as I know.
And there are plenty of folks on this board who want 1/6 investigated that do not pledge loyalty to Pelosi.
Is there anyone here who opposes this investigation that is not a Trump loyalist?

Again, as soon as you show us someone that is not a Pelosi "loyalist. "
 
Trumpers are victims of a disinformation campaign waged by Putin and other internet troll threats to Democracies around the world. Pelosi is merely head of the House at the moment. She is vilified by the disinformation spread about her, just as they are vilifying vaccines.


When has there been an invasion of the Capitol based on a lie by a loser of the election?

"Plenty of violent attacks" is a rationalization. We have had them in the past, so how bad can one be in an effort to overturn an election?

Its commonly used to defend authoritarianism. Nothing is right or wrong. It either works or it doesn't.
 
So you think we should just can the investigations because they may make your orange god look bad? You and rest of MAGA world. We ought to just quit bickering about all this. The committee's work will proceed no matter what obstruction it gets from republicans. Violent insurrectionists will continue to be charged and jailed.

Think of it this way. If the probe finds out that no one in Trumps world had any responsibility for the riot, it should be a major win for you.

It seems the way you're defending Trump and crew and trashing the committee, you must already know Trump is guilty as hell. Otherwise you wouldn't be fighting it so hard.
Have a nice day.
 
CNN is about to start coverage of the Jan 6 Select Committee Hearings - are you watching?
Maybe this thread can be a place to voice our collective thoughts.
I'm going to the SD Zoo, were the kangaroos are more intelligent and entertaining.
 
Trumpers are victims of a disinformation campaign waged by Putin and other internet troll threats to Democracies around the world. Pelosi is merely head of the House at the moment. She is vilified by the disinformation spread about her, just as they are vilifying vaccines.


When has there been an invasion of the Capitol based on a lie by a loser of the election?
I think the correct term is "my orange god"

Have a nice day.
 
Well, this morning I realized both Fox News and Newsmax were showing it so my TV got turned off. When I was checking those channels earlier, some police office was talking about racism in America. I certainly thought that an off topic and odd topic for this venue, but I was only there for a few seconds as I was checking channels. Maybe he got back to business later.
I can't help but wonder if many regular Fox News and Newmax viewers have also chosen not to waste any time on this and if they'll, thus, get back to regular programming VERY soon. I'm quite certain Fox News will not want their ratings to resemble those of CNN - so I'm thinking these networks will soon regroup if a big portion of their viewers are opting out of this circus. I'll check back in later today to see.
I did read this is the first time in history a House Speaker has refused the Minority Leader's assignments - so Nancy breaking norms again. Her most memorable moment of all time, for me, was her childish tearing up of the SOTU speech. I wonder if that was a first in history too?
The policeman testifying was describing how he had been called nigger numerous times by the insurrectionists.

Turning off the testimonies of the police defending those in the Capitol, some who have turned their back on them after they risked their lives was emotional. Some have life long injuries.

McCarthy also refused an independent investigation which is why he was subjected to Pelosi being able to refuse 2 of his choices. So he picked up his toys and went home. He was infantile.
 
Have a nice day.
No .. I wouldn't waste my time on hearings that will produce no fruit (just like the 9/11 commission and similar commissions). I'd rather rely on objective results from law enforcement already carrying out the same investigations, instead of politically motivated "outcomes."

Remember when you took a gas mask on your Capitol visit?
 
So elaborating on my opinion / position is 'attacking'?
Is this one of those 'Speech or opinions I don't agree with is violence' things? :rolleyes:
You're attacking the investigation, the people who are doing the investigation and anyone who says anything bad about the insurrectionists or Trump.

It's the old Karl Rove/Rush Limbaugh thing. And it works.
 
Not particularly. We've all seen the videos. For seven months now. What would have been informative is testimony from the command in the Capital and Metropolitan police as to why they were so unprepared for the riot.
They will obviously look into that. But for the ghoulish, unscrupulous part of the audience [see trumphumpers] its not gong to lead to Nancy Pelosi.

The cries of what did Nancy know and when did she know it are BS. The Speaker does not control the budget for either House or Senate or Capital security. So SORRY....this shrill cry is about as legit as the fake Arizona audit.
 
pejoratives to refer to other posters here. But you knew that.


Again, as soon as you show us someone that is not a Pelosi "loyalist. "
Pelosi does not send representatives to the House for one thing and there is no such thing as Pelosi Republicans.

So I didn't see any Pelosi loyalists and I surely did not see any Pelosi Republicans. I saw ant-insurrectionists. You boys have bet on a LOSER!
 
They will obviously look into that. But for the ghoulish, unscrupulous part of the audience [see trumphumpers] its not gong to lead to Nancy Pelosi.

The cries of what did Nancy know and when did she know it are BS. The Speaker does not control the budget for either House or Senate or Capital security. So SORRY....this shrill cry is about as legit as the fake Arizona audit.
It’s just another lie fed to them so they will not have to look at the truth.
 
Meeting to overturn an election lost by someone you fear will make of break you politically? Who are you kidding?
We all knew the insurrectionist propaganda would be strong today.

Just wait until the lead Republican media talker starts lying tonight.
 
Think of it this way. If the probe finds out that no one in Trumps world had any responsibility for the riot, it should be a major win for you.

It seems the way you're defending Trump and crew and trashing the committee, you must already know Trump is guilty as hell. Otherwise you wouldn't be fighting it so hard.
This issue in a nutshell
 
Throw out millions of votes to anoint your party leader president smacks of authoritarianism.
as does a party platform that consists of "whatever the cult leader says"
 
Back
Top Bottom