• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jan 6 Select Committee Hearings - are you watching

Ikari said:
You obviously see little wrong, else you'd want it investigated. If you're opposed to "Nancy's little circus", then your complaints should be against the Republicans who shot down the bipartisan committee.

You've been deflecting from the 1/6 Sedition all this time and trying to focus on Pelosi instead. So you don't seem to support an investigation into 1/6. And that's not a lie, just a fact. If you don't like it, then stop doing it.
Click to expand...
Have a nice day
 
CaughtInThe said:
You're doing whatever good Trump supporter and/or insurrectionist should be doing. Attacking.
Click to expand...
So elaborating on my opinion / position is 'attacking'?
Is this one of those 'Speech or opinions I don't agree with is violence' things? :rolleyes:
 
ModG23 said:
Actually it is Trumpers who want a one party state. They have decimated the GOP and are trying to do the same to the Democrats. funny you can’t see that.
Click to expand...
'Actually it is Trumpers who want a one party state.' In your imagination only. More so a case of the left projecting, once again.
 
Rawley said:
There have been ten investigations in the House already. Several in the Senate. And a very comprehensive investigation and report regarding the security failures by a bipartisan Senate committee.
Click to expand...
Wait, can you show the ten investigations? you sound confused.
 
eohrnberger said:
Yes, yes. More 'people who love democracy' so much so that no dirty political trick, no abuse of power is out of bounds. As I posted.
In Democrats I see ambition for a single party state, and little else. It's fairly transparent. I wonder why you've not picked up on it.
Click to expand...
It is the republicans at this point who have relegated themselves to Donald Trump. The GOP cannot be about one man. No party can. This is the only reason you see the democrats as a single party state. The GOP has made themselves useless along with their minority of support, which is shrinking every day.
 
eohrnberger said:
'Actually it is Trumpers who want a one party state.' In your imagination only. More so a case of the left projecting, once again.
Click to expand...
Trump wants to be the authoritarian. He’s not a Republican in any sense of the word. He’s not conservative. He has taken over the party because they think he is their ticket to 2022/2024. He is using them just as he has used everyone he knows to enrich himself.
 
ModG23 said:
Wait, can you show the ten investigations? you sound confused.
Click to expand...
Sorry. It was nine. THis is the tenth.

Nine different House Committees and subcommittees have requested documents from the White House, federal agencies, law enforcement and the leaders that oversee Capitol security related to the attack, and some have held hearings to question the decisions of the officials who were in charge that day. Separately, the Senate Rules and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committees have been conducting a joint investigation with their own hearings.
Click to expand...

www.cbsnews.com

House Democrats seek ways to investigate January 6 after Senate Republicans block commission

Pelosi laid out four options in a call with members on Tuesday.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
 
ModG23 said:
Wait, can you show the ten investigations? you sound confused.
Click to expand...

Those were committee investigations that did not possess subpeona powers.
Rawley said:
Sorry. It was nine. THis is the tenth.

www.cbsnews.com

House Democrats seek ways to investigate January 6 after Senate Republicans block commission

Pelosi laid out four options in a call with members on Tuesday.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...


And how many of those ten committee/subcommittee panels have subpoena powers as does the current 1/6 Commission?
 
From your link.....

Nine different House Committees and subcommittees have requested documents from the White House, federal agencies, law enforcement and the leaders that oversee Capitol security related to the attack,
Click to expand...

This 1/6 Commission does not have to rely on requests. It can subpoena documents and witnesses.
 
Rawley said:
Frankly, your use of pejoratives like "Trumpers" tells me you are not interested in a serious discussion of the issue.
Click to expand...
Is it possible to have a serious discussion about 1/6 with someone who still pledges loyalty to Trump? If so, can you point me to them please?
 
Buckeyes85 said:
Is it possible to have a serious discussion about 1/6 with someone who still pledges loyalty to Trump? If so, can you point me to them please?
Click to expand...
It is not. The Trumpeteers and Trump Cultists have done everything they can to avoid this investigation and will do everything they can to spin a narrative about Pelosi and a witchhunt and blah blah blah even though they had every opportunity to create a bipartisan commission.
 
eohrnberger said:
'Actually it is Trumpers who want a one party state.' In your imagination only. More so a case of the left projecting, once again.
Click to expand...

Throw out millions of votes to anoint your party leader president smacks of authoritarianism.
 
j brown's body said:
He promised it would be "wild." He did not disappoint.
Click to expand...
Trump spent months whipping is Cult up into a froth over a "stolen election" which wasn't actually stolen. There could have been no other outcome than the 1/6 Sedition.
 
The AntiDonald said:
It is the republicans at this point who have relegated themselves to Donald Trump. The GOP cannot be about one man. No party can.
Click to expand...
I think you conflating the agenda that Trump gave voice to as being solely about him the personality. Some of us don't put any politician on a pedestal.
I've posted before that I can't stand Trump the man, but did agree with the governance during his term. That separation in itself seems to be what you are not taking into consideration.
The AntiDonald said:
This is the only reason you see the democrats as a single party state.
Click to expand...
It is not. I see the democrat's as wanting their single party state by their own words:
  • Pack SCOTUS with leftist judicial activists to enshrine their agenda into law, sans public suport
  • Eliminate the filibuster so as to enable Senate mob rule
  • Pass HR1 & SB1 to federalize elections to their permanent advantage
Those are all 'one party state' objectives, and it is solely the Democrats who are supporting them.
The AntiDonald said:
The GOP has made themselves useless along with their minority of support, which is shrinking every day.
Click to expand...
I think that's just more of your wishful thinking, of which you seem to have allot.
 
Rawley said:
I'm opposed to Nancy's little circus. Which has nothing to do with you posting lies about my position -"much like you see little wrong with the 1/6 Sedition. "
Click to expand...
its only a "circus" to the Cult for some reason.
 
ModG23 said:
Trump wants to be the authoritarian. He’s not a Republican in any sense of the word. He’s not conservative. He has taken over the party because they think he is their ticket to 2022/2024. He is using them just as he has used everyone he knows to enrich himself.
Click to expand...
LOL. None of which is in evidence, except your own (and perhaps some others') fevered imaginations. Sorry.
 
Rawley said:
The question was regarding interest in these officers' testimony. I don't believe they offered any testimony that shed any light on the riot that we haven't already seen for seven months in the videos. It was clearly directed at a narrative rather than any "truth" about what happened. Which is fine - that is clearly what Nancy's committee is all about. But don't pretend this investigation has anything to do with new information or the "truth."
Click to expand...

Any thoughts on why Trump did nothing to try and stop it?
 
Rawley said:
There have been ten investigations in the House already. Several in the Senate. And a very comprehensive investigation and report regarding the security failures by a bipartisan Senate committee.
Click to expand...
and we still haven't gotten to the bottom yet of what McCarthy/Trump knew, and when did they know it.
 
eohrnberger said:
LOL. None of which is in evidence, except your own (and perhaps some others') fevered imaginations. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Strong arming state legislators and election officials to change or "find" votes smacks of authoritarianism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom