• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jake Tapper's Book Exposes Biden Cognitive Decline Coverup - Will Anyone Be Held Accountable?

Will the House Oversight Committee's investigation result in accountability for the cover-up?


  • Total voters
    36
FDR wanted the Democrat Party to be a Progressive party and tried to purge Conservatives from its ranks. He wanted the two parties to offer the American people a stark ideological choice. Well, his dream has now been realized, and it’s a nightmare. It’s funny how each party believes that THEY are not extreme but it’s the OTHER side who’s extreme. The reality is that they’re both extreme but too delusional to realize it, kinda like how the villain in the movie never believes he’s the villain but is actually the good guy.

Mark
Side-topic, but have you a source in mind for this claim? I don't necessarily dispute it, but I haven't heard it before.
 
What record do you think there needs to be? Biden, an old man with an infirm hand, declares a pile of paper meets his approval for signature and says, "Sign these!". Period. End of story. Why would he sign a document commanding that documents be signed? How stupid is that?
Mad Libs didn't think it was stupid when Trump claimed that he could automatically declassify documents by Presidential fiat. They demanded in-advance documentation, though I have not seen that requirement in writing. If Mad Libs think one Presidential action is dicey when not backed up by documents, why not all such actions?
 
Well, by extension I'm also calling all the Bidungs "dung-names," not just Rapey Joe, and not even a Mad Lib could doubt that Jill Bidung is a white female politician, since she and her cohorts took control of the country while their puppet was incapacitated.

Keep feeding me those Mad Lib straight lines; it's loads o' fun.
Until comment 286 I have NEVER seen you or any Rightie on here refer to anyone else as "dung". Now you are doing it to cover up for posting a racist trope. Kamaltoe, or Kamaldung, same thing, we recognize the trope. You can dance all you want, and you can plead your innocence for 99 more posts, but I have only ever heard expressions like those used by racists and against people of color.
 
Mad Libs didn't think it was stupid when Trump claimed that he could automatically declassify documents by Presidential fiat.
BULLSHIT! These two events cannot be conflated, and you know it. Trump's claim was not only long after the fact, long after he had already left office, but in direct violation of a court order to produce those documents. What's your excuse for his efforts to hide them from the law after he knew they were sought? Your analogy isn't even apples and oranges, it's weather balloons and Osage oranges. One of them flies while the other one just rots on the ground. Guess which is which.
They demanded in-advance documentation, though I have not seen that requirement in writing. If Mad Libs think one Presidential action is dicey when not backed up by documents, why not all such actions?
How do you live with yourself?
 
Until comment 286 I have NEVER seen you or any Rightie on here refer to anyone else as "dung". Now you are doing it to cover up for posting a racist trope. Kamaltoe, or Kamaldung, same thing, we recognize the trope. You can dance all you want, and you can plead your innocence for 99 more posts, but I have only ever heard expressions like those used by racists and against people of color.
Even if I had not worked the Bidungs into the mix, it still would not matter that I made a pun on Cameldung's name, because a pun is all it ever was. You want to believe that it's OK to pun on the names of your enemies-- I'm sure you'd never object to the failed attempt of some Lib to rename Trump as "Drumpf"-- which I have seen here from some unoriginal posters. But you're married to the idea that no one can pun on a multiracial's name, even if the pun has nothing to do with their race. "Kamala" sounds like "camel," and the correlation arises from the fact that she never let anything but dung come out of her mouth. Drivel on about "racism," all you like, but the Libs' policy of racial hoaxing has been fully exposed and you have zero credibility.
 
BULLSHIT! These two events cannot be conflated, and you know it. Trump's claim was not only long after the fact, long after he had already left office, but in direct violation of a court order to produce those documents. What's your excuse for his efforts to hide them from the law after he knew they were sought? Your analogy isn't even apples and oranges, it's weather balloons and Osage oranges. One of them flies while the other one just rots on the ground. Guess which is which.

How do you live with yourself?
There's still no written specification as to the exact process a President must use to declassify documents, and this compares to the argument that BIdung could just go ahead and allow his aides to employ the autopen. What's rotting are all Lib arguments made to give the Bidung regime a pass on all of their dickery. I will admit that the autopen attack by the Cons probably is one of the weaker Con strategies, but the "advance pardon" for people like Hunter and Fauci is so horribly corrupt that any attack is morally justified.
 
Even if I had not worked the Bidungs into the mix, it still would not matter that I made a pun on Cameldung's name, because a pun is all it ever was. You want to believe that it's OK to pun on the names of your enemies-- I'm sure you'd never object to the failed attempt of some Lib to rename Trump as "Drumpf"-- which I have seen here from some unoriginal posters. But you're married to the idea that no one can pun on a multiracial's name, even if the pun has nothing to do with their race. "Kamala" sounds like "camel," and the correlation arises from the fact that she never let anything but dung come out of her mouth. Drivel on about "racism," all you like, but the Libs' policy of racial hoaxing has been fully exposed and you have zero credibility.
Methinks thou dost protest too much.

Look up the meaning.
 
Even if I had not worked the Bidungs into the mix, it still would not matter that I made a pun on Cameldung's name, because a pun is all it ever was. You want to believe that it's OK to pun on the names of your enemies-- I'm sure you'd never object to the failed attempt of some Lib to rename Trump as "Drumpf"-- which I have seen here from some unoriginal posters. But you're married to the idea that no one can pun on a multiracial's name, even if the pun has nothing to do with their race. "Kamala" sounds like "camel," and the correlation arises from the fact that she never let anything but dung come out of her mouth. Drivel on about "racism," all you like, but the Libs' policy of racial hoaxing has been fully exposed and you have zero credibility.
FYI, Trump's original family name was Drumpf before his family changed it. I often default to using it as in "Kaiser Drumpf", because just like so many from Project 2025's Heritage Foundation, I'm an "Originalist". 🤣

Wanting to shun the family's German roots was cowardly.
🫤
 
There's still no written specification as to the exact process a President must use to declassify documents,
I'll go way out on a limb here and say that for a President to declassify documents, it has to be done WHILE HE'S STILL PRESIDENT !!!
and this compares to the argument that BIdung could just go ahead and allow his aides to employ the autopen.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
What's rotting are all Lib arguments made to give the Bidung regime a pass on all of their dickery. I will admit that the autopen attack by the Cons probably is one of the weaker Con strategies, but the "advance pardon" for people like Hunter and Fauci is so horribly corrupt that any attack is morally justified.
^^^ Mostly bullshit. ^^^
 
Methinks thou dost protest too much.

Look up the meaning.
The meaning of what. the phrase "protest too much?" In the bard's play the correct context is that Queen Gertrude is responding to the play her son Hamlet set up to "catch the conscience of the king." She says that the play's grieving wife is "protesting"-- which in the right context means "declaiming"-- her grief too loudly to be believable. Sort of like alleged "anti-racists" constantly declaiming that racism is everywhere, thus justifying their empty rhetoric and hollow virtue signaling.
 
FYI, Trump's original family name was Drumpf before his family changed it. I often default to using it as in "Kaiser Drumpf", because just like so many from Project 2025's Heritage Foundation, I'm an "Originalist". 🤣

Wanting to shun the family's German roots was cowardly.
🫤
But Mad Libs didn't bring up the original family name because they cared about accuracy. They did so because the original name sounded like English "dumb," which also could've played into the family's reason for changing it. Libs wanted to take advantage of an accidental sound-alike pun, and that's fine with me. Their act of commission, which no Lib, mad or otherwise, ever protests, justifies any and all puns used against Lib politicians.
 
I'll go way out on a limb here and say that for a President to declassify documents, it has to be done WHILE HE'S STILL PRESIDENT !!!

Assumes facts not in evidence.

^^^ Mostly bullshit. ^^^
Feel free to cite the specific rule that states that priority.

Nothing's greater bullshit than the Dems' endorsement of elder abuse for the sake of political advancement.
 
But Mad Libs didn't bring up the original family name because they cared about accuracy. They did so because the original name sounded like English "dumb," which also could've played into the family's reason for changing it. Libs wanted to take advantage of an accidental sound-alike pun, and that's fine with me. Their act of commission, which no Lib, mad or otherwise, ever protests, justifies any and all puns used against Lib politicians.
NO - you are WRONG! They changed their name because they wanted to publicly separate themselves from their German identity, and thus avoid anti-German sentiment in this country.
 
Feel free to cite the specific rule that states that priority.

Nothing's greater bullshit than the Dems' endorsement of elder abuse for the sake of political advancement.
Changing the subject fails to buttress your argument about the name Drumpf. One has nothing to do with the other.
 
Biden was never mentally compromised

c'mon man

 
Biden was never mentally compromised

c'mon man


Oooh, look! A video!!

The current president's mental instability ....









https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J00qjO2xgE

Trump has always been mentally compromised. Ask yourself this. Why has the White House removed the transcripts of all of Trump's impromptu and extemporaneous speeches? Hmm? I'd love to hear your explanation of that action. Unlike with every other president before him, the only Trump speeches you will now find on the White House website are the scripted ones that he is forced to read off a teleprompter. Why?
 
NO - you are WRONG! They changed their name because they wanted to publicly separate themselves from their German identity, and thus avoid anti-German sentiment in this country.
I'm not talking about the Trump Family's motives for changing their name. I'm stating that I don't believe any Mad Libs brought up the original name for any reason but because the name sounds like English "dumb."
 
Changing the subject fails to buttress your argument about the name Drumpf. One has nothing to do with the other.
Since you weren't following my argument about the reason Mad Libs brought up a name no longer being used, I threw in a side topic. You don't have to address it if you don't want to. I wasn't really expecting an answer anyway.
 
If there is no crime, what is the point?
Did you read and understand what SKyChief posted?
"dems are screwed because voters will become aware of the cover-up, and that would likely hurt democrats at the polls in midterms."
The Administration is going to need all the help it can get to retain House and Senate seats next year. AN investigation into the Biden mental acuity coverup is going to sour lots of Dems and Independent voters who feel they were duped into believing Biden had a chance to win last year.
 
Now, everyone pay attention to the Biden Crime Family and make sure NO ONE ever votes for Biden again. :rolleyes:

well ok, what Crime Family do you recommend we vote for now?

all of the Info is out there and disregarded regardless of how well researched it may be. ........and do you still believe in the Myth that voting for either party makes a Dime's worth of difference?

really, tell me how. thanks.
 
Probably no more accountability than for the guy who tried to overturn a free and fair election.

um J, what 'free and fair election'.

how do those Electronic voting machines work and who controls them?

i have posted regarding the Myth of electronic voting. they even created a Political Show in florida regarding the hanging chads to bring in the 'honest electronic voting' and now we have Zero paper trail.

so tell me please how yur version of 'free and electronic elections' work.

and i won't wait cause you don't know and prolly never answer honestly on this matter.



blessings.
 
None of the answers on the poll are good. I don't think anyone will be held accountable.
But funny how Democrats (and their media) spend four years outright lying to us about Biden, but somehow the issue is that it a "Republican stunt".

and that matters how?

the Red and Blue teams both work for the same Corrupt dee cee handlers, so it all becomes a 'stunt' if you will.


have we figured this out yet, or we still into Dialectical thinking ??

never mind, i know the answers all ready.


.
 
and that matters how?

the Red and Blue teams both work for the same Corrupt dee cee handlers, so it all becomes a 'stunt' if you will.


have we figured this out yet, or we still into Dialectical thinking ??

never mind, i know the answers all ready.
You think you're smart because you figured out that both sides play dirty? Congratulations.
 
Right wingers are fine covering up Trump's cognitive decline.

This. They act concerned about covering up a cognitive decline in a President while actively supporting it.

Sure, let's hold people accountable for Biden - on the condition Trump gets fully tested and held accountable too.
 
Back
Top Bottom