- Joined
- Feb 25, 2019
- Messages
- 51,617
- Reaction score
- 24,767
- Location
- Devonshire, England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
You are literally and objectively wrong.
It does not take a conviction to be defined as a criminal, only and actual criminal act, which he committed through his interactions with the police that day.
Apparently you are the one playing a game and even misstating reality to do so. And then running becasue you know you are wrong.
Insanity? :lamo:lamo:lamo
Not. Routine policy.
He is in custody. You keep those in custody cuffed.
Irrelevant. He was in custody.
That's what happens when charges are vacated, you get released from custody.
See, there's 'routine policy' and then there's compassion and common sense. Your idiot, mindless robocops clearly don't understand the distinction.