I recall Cohen answered that the checks came from a personal account. To that I say, so?So, Cohen provided a rehash of much of what we already know. What has his actions, his emotional outbursts, his hype have to do with how the Democrats on the panel conducted themselves? I watched pretty much the entire hearing. While there were some moments where things got heated, most the reactions by Democrats were in response to how Republicans on the panel conducted themselves.
Now, if you're trying to claim that the entire hearing was a big waste of time, I would disagree with you. Again, Cohen may have rehashed some things we already knew or went into greater detail about things we knew a little of, but one thing that wasn't previously known were those checks and who wrote them. That, my friend, the GOP nor Trump will not be able to explain away no matter how hard they try.
Ivanka Trump and Donald Jr wanted for interviews by House committee – live | US news | The Guardian
Under oath I presume? This must be why he's cutting the summit short and rushing home.
There is no news here. The Democrats are grandstanding in their attempt to get Trump out of office any way they can. If not impreachment or indictment then sway the vote in the election 2020. It would be nice to see democrats come up with good candidates, good policies and reasonable means to pay for the bills. The cannot and will not do those things.
Yeah, but the only way you'd get to either of them would be if someone implicates them in knowing what was going on. Until that happens, you can't just go after the wife or kid just because you think they may know something. That said, I firmly believe that if investigators go after Ivanka and back her into a corner, Trump will do everything in his power to protect her including fall on his sword. She's the one person he'd drop everything for in order to protect.
Daddy's little girl...what father wouldn't come to the rescue for his daughter. "Taken" anyone?
So, there is no news here? A president ordering officials to give his son-in-law security clearance despite concerns by the intelligence staff that are charged with vetting applicants, isn't news?
How anyone can dismiss legitimate security concerns as, 'that's just the bad ole Democrats being mean to Trump,' requires a lethal dose of cognitive dissonance.
I know that Mueller is finished with Cohen, and all that Cohen had to offer. No added indictments from Mueller or form NY. And they had all this info a long time ago. What the American people got to know is just how crooked and a liar that dumbass lawyer was. There is not a prosecutor on this planet that would use Cohen as a witness for the prosecution. Christ he even lied about him not wanting a job at the WH. He's a pathological liar. I know Cohen was one of your key guys that Mueller had that was spill the beans on Russia/Trump collusion. Now the American People got to know there was no collisions with Russia/Trump, or was he lying???????
So, I was asking sly, but, you don't like the policy. That does not indicate treason. Try again.
False equivalence whataboutism noted.MTAtech said:So, there is no news here? A president ordering officials to give his son-in-law security clearance despite concerns by the intelligence staff that are charged with vetting applicants, isn't news?
How anyone can dismiss legitimate security concerns as, 'that's just the bad ole Democrats being mean to Trump,' requires a lethal dose of cognitive dissonance.says the crowd that defended Hillary storing classified documents on her personal bathroom server.
No, it is your silly theory..er uh J, doing putin's bidding is not a policy. Now that we know that Trump is acting just like the dossier predicted lets look at an example. Trump believes putin over his own intelligence agencies. is that a policy?
No, it is your silly theory..
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
says the crowd that defended Hillary storing classified documents on her personal bathroom server.
Do you know what a sealed indictment is? Do you know why it is sealed and secret?
Cohen named names. Are you going to call those folks pathological liars as well when they corroborate Cohen's testimony? When they produce documentary evidence that Trump was aware of and even ordered the bank fraud, the insurance fraud, and the tax evasion, are you going to dismiss that as well?
Did Cohen say "I know for a fact there was no collusion,"? No, Cohen said he had "no knowledge of collusion." To your mind, that proves there was no collusion. Interesting.
Dems desperately throwing everything they can at the Russia collusion carcass hoping that something will stick.
I'd rather pound my head against a brick wall, than explain your failings to you...There are professionals for that sort of thing...can you be specific about what you think is my "silly theory"? Its not real clear. I'm not making up the fact that the dossier said Russia was behind the email hacking. And I'm not making up the fact that trump has acted exactly as the dossier predicted. And attacking nato, calling America murderers, believing putin over his intelligence agencies isn't really a policy. so please explain.
I encourage impeachment. That way we can see everything the dems did to subvert a duly elected president. Thats like standing in a pool of gasoline and threatening to strike a match....mmmmkay...go for it. I'd live to see comey, schiffhead, lynch, Hillary and Obama get caught in that.Cultists praying trump covered it up well enough that it can't be proven by a reasonable doubt.
To bad that standard does not need to be met for impeachment...
I'd rather pound my head against a brick wall, than explain your failings to you...There are professionals for that sort of thing...
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
You gonna cry now?I asked you to explain your post. I knew you couldn't. The only question is do you know. If you do, that makes your dodge a dishonest dodge.
I encourage impeachment. That way we can see everything the dems did to subvert a duly elected president. Thats like standing in a pool of gasoline and threatening to strike a match....mmmmkay...go for it. I'd live to see comey, schiffhead, lynch, Hillary and Obama get caught in that.
You gonna cry now?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
No you really didn't....need a tissue?J, you asked "what traitorous acts". I posted them. You've been deflecting non stop since. Now your deflections are getting childish. color me shocked.
He factually is duly elected. Do you deny this fact? If yes, we will never speak again. I have 0 tolerance for fact deniers. Facebook is great for these types of posts but not a political forum.First why are cultists so insecure that they always have to qualify with the words "duly elected president"?
Is it because he is not a duly elected president, and if you say he is often enough someone will believe you?
Second what the hell would Hillary or Obama have to do with a trump impeachment???
Oh, man. That would be some great television! trump's lawyers will never let it happen. We'll never see any public testimony from anyone in the trump crime family.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?