• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ivanka Trump and Donald Jr wanted for interviews by House committee - Live

If they discussed an upcoming crime (tax evasion, campaign violations, bank fraud, etc.) privilege does not apply. Not even a lawyer is allowed to claim privilege if it is about an ongoing or future crime. It's called conspiracy, and that is a crime.
Enjoy your fantasies while you can. :roll:
 
I'm not sure they can stop it altogether. They might be able to argue the president doesn't have to answer to congress, but the staff? Or any other private citizen? Maybe they'll be able to swing a closed-door hearing.

TBH I still wonder if the Dems in congress even have the stones to ask. They've not been the most aggressive bunch in recent years. The wall battle and the Cohen hearing were signs they're willing to push back, but I still fear they can't handle a real fight. The GOP has been down in the mud for many years. They're better at this.

I fear you are correct :(
 
Do you know what a sealed indictment is? Do you know why it is sealed and secret?

And what in the hell does that have anything to do with?

Cohen named names. Are you going to call those folks pathological liars as well when they corroborate Cohen's testimony? When they produce documentary evidence that Trump was aware of and even ordered the bank fraud, the insurance fraud, and the tax evasion, are you going to dismiss that as well

Cohen named names, really. He also said there was no collusion with Trump and the Russians. Was he lying??? That's a question.

When you say in bold that Trump committed those crimes, you also believed Trump colluded with the Russians. However I'll wait for the indictments and the charges against him and when the trial is over and if he is convicted then so be it. If he is not found guilty you have to live with it.

Did Cohen say "I know for a fact there was no collusion,"? No, Cohen said he had "no knowledge of collusion." To your mind, that proves there was no collusion. Interesting.

To my mind he's a liar and thug and is going to jail for 3 yr.s I don't believe a word he says. But you believe him as you pointed out with all of the Trumps crimes what Cohen said. And Cohen, that you desperately relied on that Mueller was going to roll over to kill Trump with collusion and you were 100% convinced Mueller was going to roll over Manafort, Flynn, and all the others of Trump Russia collusion. I ask where is the collusion?? You have a truck load of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians. So now where is all your evidence of collusion. This was your mainstay charge that was going to kill Trump.
 
//// I know that Mueller is....... ////// ( No you don't ) You're making a fallacious claim you can't prove to be anything but an 'opinion'.....i.e. you don't know squat about what Mueller may be finished with. ) Claiming to 'know' anything about the Mueller investigation makes one look silly. unless, of course you can produce 'factual evidence' to substantiate your rather dubious claims. Feel free to do just that. Won't be holding breath on that one.

OK then what is Mueller going to charge Cohen with next???? Simple question.
 
OK then what is Mueller going to charge Cohen with next???? Simple question.

Could be anything..could be nothing...But one thing is certain. As we speak, no one knows the answer to that question, including you. Anything you claim is sheer speculation, nothing more, nothing less. ( fact )
 
Could be anything..could be nothing...But one thing is certain. As we speak, no one knows the answer to that question, including you. Anything you claim is sheer speculation, nothing more, nothing less. ( fact )

So if Mueller does not indict Cohen by the time he issues his report, is that the end or are you still going to speculate that Mueller at sometime in the future, and that could be years he might indict Cohen again????
 
So if Mueller does not indict Cohen by the time he issues his report, is that the end or are you still going to speculate that Mueller at sometime in the future, and that could be years he might indict Cohen again????

You're moving the goal posts now. The better question is 'Are you going to continue make claims about Mueller's investigation you can't prove to be factual until said report is presented to the DOJ' ?....
 
My point stands....you really should not let Trump in your head like that, it's not healthy....

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

I hear you. It’s a sick place...
 
Hell if I know, but now your heard from the Crooks mouth there was no Russia/Trump collusion. In fact every investigation has proved that. Now what do you do to get Trump? Go after the kids, and their kids and the wife, ex wives, email, bank accounts. Everyone around Trump has been investigated. But you'll find something and that will be your next. NOW we got one of the ex wives and she is going to spill the beans on Trump, we have all this evidence and it points somewhere.

I guess you don't understand why we cannot have a criminal as President. It's sad that partisanship has become that bad.
 
No you really didn't....need a tissue?

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

Oh j, your initial dishonest reply was to "paraphrase" trump doing putin's bidding as a "policy". You then resorted to deflection when I pointed out "doing Putin's bidding is not a policy". And childish deflection at that. Lets review. You asked "what traitorous acts." I posted that the republican platform was softened on Russia and Trump attacked nato. Trump actions were the quid pro quo arrangement predicted by the Steele Dossier.


"Parts of the dossier have been stood up and in places it looks prophetic. One Steele memo says the Kremlin was behind the hacking of DNC emails, claiming these were released via WikiLeaks for reasons of “plausible deniability”. In return, Trump agreed to “sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine” as a campaign issue and to raise “US/Nato defence commitments in the Baltics and eastern Europe” to deflect attention.

This is precisely what happened at the Republican National Convention last July, when language on the US’s commitment to Ukraine was mysteriously softened. Meanwhile, in a series of tweets, Trump questioned whether US allies were paying enough into Nato coffers.
"
What do we know about alleged links between Trump and Russia? | US news | The Guardian
 
You're moving the goal posts now. The better question is 'Are you going to continue make claims about Mueller's investigation you can't prove to be factual until said report is presented to the DOJ' ?....

Nice Try, You pop up with another no answer.

:2wave: Bye
 
I guess you don't understand why we cannot have a criminal as President. It's sad that partisanship has become that bad.

That's for sure, it's a blessing that Crooked Hillary lost, she would be long gone by now.
 
Tomorrow the House will request documents from Trump Jr.
 
I really think that the Democrats are missing out here. Ivanka and Don Jr. have been prepped for this kind of thing. They know what’s coming and they know how to respond. If the Democrats really want to get the inside scoop on how things went down they have to go to someone else who knows everything but hasn’t been prepped.

They need to go after Melania and, if possible, Barron.

Melania is the one who would know everything and once the philandering stuff starts to come out you’d get the “scorned wife” dynamic on top of it. She’d be the one with the most personal incentive to destroy Trump.

The reason to go after Barron is that Trump would never expect that move and would probably cave in a day just to protect him.

If Democrats want to save this country they can’t be afraid of breaking a few eggs and they can’t allow themselves to be stymied by such things as some short term political optics. I mean, seriously, once they get Trump out of office they will be the ones who get to write the history of how it all went down.

Have you not noticed that the one consistent with the Trump White House, is not the prepare for anything.
 
That's for sure, it's a blessing that Crooked Hillary lost, she would be long gone by now.

Hillary released her tax returns and was exonerated of all charges against her. Trump not so much.
 
Hillary released her tax returns and was exonerated of all charges against her. Trump not so much.

Yeah Right, Comey stood in front of the American people and listed all her crimes, but then Comey said Crooked Hillary did not intend to commit those crimes. She's free to go.
 
Tomorrow the House will request documents from Trump Jr.

Yeah the House wants to know how many times a day Trump Jr pissed in a toilet. It's all documented and well worth for the Dems to know this. It could lead to other things, like how many times he takes a **** a day.
 
Yeah Right, Comey stood in front of the American people and listed all her crimes, but then Comey said Crooked Hillary did not intend to commit those crimes. She's free to go.

Intent is a integral part of all such "crimes". Your knowledge of our justice system is faulty. You have been reading too many biased lies.
 
Yeah the House wants to know how many times a day Trump Jr pissed in a toilet. It's all documented and well worth for the Dems to know this. It could lead to other things, like how many times he takes a **** a day.

The House is charged with investigating all possible crimes on the executive and they can subpoena anyone they choose to that end.
 
Intent is a integral part of all such "crimes". Your knowledge of our justice system is faulty. You have been reading too many biased lies.

That's another bar you have to cross, you have to prove Trumps intent.
 
The House is charged with investigating all possible crimes on the executive and they can subpoena anyone they choose to that end.

I didn't say otherwise, hell I have no problem with the House going after Trump Jr to get all the documents of when and where he pissed everyday. Nor do I give a **** if the house wants to get all the documents of how many times Trump Jr ****s a day. Have at it. Christ I don't give a damn if they want to watch me take a piss during the day and night, they can even stand there and count how many times I **** a day.
 
That's another bar you have to cross, you have to prove Trumps intent.

Like you 'proved' your claim upthread that Mueller is finished with Cohen ? ( even though you have yet to produce one iota of evidence to support your positive claim ) :2rofll: :laughat:
 
That's another bar you have to cross, you have to prove Trumps intent.

His intent was already firmly established when he publicly asked Russia for their help in getting him elected president.

The Russians responded in the affirmative on that very same day.
 
Last edited:
Intent is a integral part of all such "crimes". Your knowledge of our justice system is faulty. You have been reading too many biased lies.

HRC intended to set up her private server to conduct State Dept business on. HRC intended to send, receive and store classified information on her private server.

Your knowledge of what HRC did or didn't do is faulty.
 
His intent was already firmly established when he publicly asked Russia for their help in getting him elected president.

The Russians responded in the affirmative on that very same day.

*publicly asked Russia for their help*

Reading comprehension still giving you fits I see :lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom