• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ivanka Trump and Donald Jr wanted for interviews by House committee - Live

*publicly asked Russia for their help*

Reading comprehension still giving you fits I see :lamo

And I see you are still living in denial in a state of your own self imposed delusion refusing to accept the reality that any rational person can easily accept.

And we all know what the medical journals call a condition of that type. You have my sympathies.
 
And I see you are still living in denial in a state of your own self imposed delusion refusing to accept the reality that any rational person can easily accept.

Still accusing those that disagree with you delusional I see.

Produce the quote haymarket ??
 
Still accusing those that disagree with you delusional I see.

Produce the quote haymarket ??

People disagree with me all the time and I accept them as perfectly mentally fit. It is only those who demonstrate that reality is not accepted and are in denial who have that particular spotlight of their own creation shined upon them.

But do not argue with me.

Argue with this source - The Encyclopedia of Mental Disorders

Denial - children, therapy, adults, examples, person, people, used, personality, theory

Definition
Denial is the refusal to acknowledge the existence or severity of unpleasant external realities or internal thoughts and feelings.


DENIAL of reality is clearly a mental disorder.
 
I didn't say otherwise, hell I have no problem with the House going after Trump Jr to get all the documents of when and where he pissed everyday. Nor do I give a **** if the house wants to get all the documents of how many times Trump Jr ****s a day. Have at it. Christ I don't give a damn if they want to watch me take a piss during the day and night, they can even stand there and count how many times I **** a day.

But that's not what they'll ask, is it? Be realistic here.

We all know they'll be talking about undeclared checks paid to mistresses and meetings with Russian agents. It may just come out how many toilet breaks Don Jr took during those meetings and I suppose there'll be some small vindication in that.
 
People disagree with me all the time and I accept them as perfectly mentally fit. It is only those who demonstrate that reality is not accepted and are in denial who have that particular spotlight of their own creation shined upon them.

But do not argue with me.

Argue with this source - The Encyclopedia of Mental Disorders

Denial - children, therapy, adults, examples, person, people, used, personality, theory




DENIAL of reality is clearly a mental disorder.

Haymarket you call posters delusional all the time.

No quote, why am I not surprised.
 
Haymarket you call posters delusional all the time.

No quote, why am I not surprised.

The offense was right here in post 125 in which the poster obviously denied the Trump invitation to Russia. Any rational person could see that. Why do I need to quote something right on the previous page in the last hour? Are you unable to read it?

I only call it when it happens from the poster where they deny reality. That is not my fault - it is the delusion of the poster. But feel free to take my over 105 thousand posts and tell me how many times I have accused a poster of delusional mental disorders because of what they posted.

DO it. I welcome it.
 
I only call it when it happens from the poster where they deny reality. That is not my fault - it is the delusion of the poster. But feel free to take my over 105 thousand posts and tell me how many times I have accused a poster of delusional mental disorders because of what they posted.

DO it. I welcome it.

Still no quote I see.
 
Still no quote I see.

The offense was right here in post 125 in which the poster - you - obviously denied the Trump invitation to Russia. Any rational person could see that. Why do I need to quote something right on the previous page in the last hour? Are you unable to read it? Did you forget you wrote it?

Quote Originally Posted by hanger4 View Post
*publicly asked Russia for their help*

Reading comprehension still giving you fits I see

You openly and scornfully mocked and derided my statement that Trump publicly asked Russia for their help and stated that its was my reading comprehension that was the problem.

That is as clear and obvious an example of willful denial of reality as one can get.
 
Last edited:
HRC intended to set up her private server to conduct State Dept business on. HRC intended to send, receive and store classified information on her private server.

Your knowledge of what HRC did or didn't do is faulty.

Colin Powell use AOL to conduct State Dept. business so why wasn't he prosecuted? Unlike Trump who handed over top secret info to the Russians in the Oval Office, the FBI could not prove that Hillary's private server was intended to leak State secrets. In fact there was never any proof that her server was ever even hacked.
 
His intent was already firmly established when he publicly asked Russia for their help in getting him elected president.

The Russians responded in the affirmative on that very same day.

Your opinions are a waste of my time.
 
Your opinions are a waste of my time.

Apparently they are so important you need to reply to them which proves your umbrage is as phony as a three dollar bill with Trumps picture on it.
 
But that's not what they'll ask, is it? Be realistic here.

We all know they'll be talking about undeclared checks paid to mistresses and meetings with Russian agents. It may just come out how many toilet breaks Don Jr took during those meetings and I suppose there'll be some small vindication in that.

Didn't Mueller investigate all the Russian agent stuff? That was the priority of his appointment. But now the House does not believe Mueller's report because we all know there was no collusion.
 
That is what Mueller is doing as we speak. Criminal conspiracies are his bread and butter.

Yeah right, every investigation has proved there was no Russia/Trump collusion. Even Cohen lied there was no collusion or did he lie there was collusion? I leave Cohen to you libs to figure it out. I do know there is not one prosecutor on this planet that would use Cohen as a witness in any trail.
 
Apparently they are so important you need to reply to them which proves your umbrage is as phony as a three dollar bill with Trumps picture on it.

Why is it so hard for you to understand, your comments are baseless and useless, and a waste of my time.

:beatdeadhorse:2wave:
 
Why is it so hard for you to understand, your comments are baseless and useless, and a waste of my time.

:beatdeadhorse:2wave:

And you did it again wasting even more of your precious time. :lol::mrgreen::lamo

Each of your denials proves you are not being honest.
 
Didn't Mueller investigate all the Russian agent stuff? That was the priority of his appointment. But now the House does not believe Mueller's report because we all know there was no collusion.

has the report been released already?
 
Last edited:
Ivanka Trump and Donald Jr wanted for interviews by House committee – live | US news | The Guardian

Under oath I presume? This must be why he's cutting the summit short and rushing home.

imageedit-56-9311351086.jpg
 
Didn't Mueller investigate all the Russian agent stuff? That was the priority of his appointment. But now the House does not believe Mueller's report because we all know there was no collusion.

How can the House not believe Mueller's report if it hasn't been released yet? Nevertheless, the House's responsibility is to investigate all the bull that's been going on for over two years and that's what they intend to do. The Trump Foundation, The Trump Organization, the violations of the emoluments clause, illegal hush money payments, stuff like that.
 
has the report been released already?

Yeah I forgot all you libs have a truck load of evidence and witnesses that will take Trump down with all the Trump collusion with the Russians. You've been piling up all your proof of evidence for 2 yrs against Trump's collusion. It's a no brainer for Mueller to not have all the evidence you have. So it's a done deal, Trump colluded with some Russians, to do something to get Trump elected.
 
How can the House not believe Mueller's report if it hasn't been released yet? Nevertheless, the House's responsibility is to investigate all the bull that's been going on for over two years and that's what they intend to do. The Trump Foundation, The Trump Organization, the violations of the emoluments clause, illegal hush money payments, stuff like that.

Ask Adam Schiff, he's the one that is preaching he has all the proof that Trump colluded with the Russians.

House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff Says There Is Already ‘Direct Evidence’ Of Trump Camp’s Collusion

Adam Schiff has proof of Trump collusion - Yahoo Search Results
 
Colin Powell use AOL to conduct State Dept. business so why wasn't he prosecuted? Unlike Trump who handed over top secret info to the Russians in the Oval Office, the FBI could not prove that Hillary's private server was intended to leak State secrets. In fact there was never any proof that her server was ever even hacked.

*Colin Powell use AOL to conduct State Dept. business*

Aaaaaah no, Colin Powell had a state dot gov email address, HRC did not. HRC set up a private email server, Powell did not.

*the FBI could not prove that Hillary's private server was intended to leak*

Irrelevant, "gross negligence" doesn't require the intention to commit espionage.

*In fact there was never any proof that her server was ever even hacked.*

Comey stated;

"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

So saying it wasn't hacked because no proof is disingenuous considering the security protocols were so lacking one wouldn't know anyway.
 
The offense was right here in post 125 in which the poster - you - obviously denied the Trump invitation to Russia. Any rational person could see that. Why do I need to quote something right on the previous page in the last hour? Are you unable to read it? Did you forget you wrote it?



You openly and scornfully mocked and derided my statement that Trump publicly asked Russia for their help and stated that its was my reading comprehension that was the problem.

That is as clear and obvious an example of willful denial of reality as one can get.

Why won't you post Trumps quote where he publicly asked Russia for their help haymarket ??
 
Back
Top Bottom