- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 112,990
- Reaction score
- 60,552
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
next time think before typing...and next time try logic if your patting yourself proactively that you are attempting to make a point and using logic..which you are not..
My point is "fake outrage" being displayed by an obvious bigot ( not you)...
It appears we now have another tier in the argument.
"Do you honestly believe darkies would be that dumb?"
You are going to great lengths to argue a point that is irrelevant to the charges in the OP. I find that interesting. Whether it is called temporary sterilization, birth control, or anything else does not change the nature of the allegation.
And let me guess?
You think that somehow makes them sterile?
Right?
Sorry, it doesn't.
Sure, there are MEtards that believe and propagate conspiracies about Israel. That's another thread.
Do you believe that the Israeli government is uniquely above reproach?
Except you have not managed to show that. Unbless you can show that those who find the alleged action inappropriate do in fact find Saudi Arabia's treatment of women acceptable, your point fails. I myself have spent far too much time in that part of the world and do not like how any of the countries there treat people.
I think it is extremely unlikely that there is a Hitler-like conspiracy
I have a very good explanation for the data (gathered by merely 1 researcher from merely 30 people).
It's easier to blindly eny the allegations if one jumps through intellectual hoops to pretend that the allegations involve hyperbole.
You're making a declaration dependent on ignorance, when you should be saying "I want more evidence", being that the evidence that is available doesn't seem to paint the best picture, though still inconclusive
Youre missing my point.. but at least we agree about the horrific treatment of women under Sharia...
Yes. I and others are laughing at your assertion.:lol: quoted for the lols.
You are making an irrelevant comparison. Thor did not say that it was more "sad", only that it was sad.
can you please stop using such offensive terms?..."darkies"....enough!!!!...
No, I cited people using it Correctrly.As I said before, citing people using the word incorrectly does not prove me wrong,. It only proves that you are also ignorant of what the word actually means. It's like the way you are ignorant of what the word dishonest means.
Ah, so the problem is that you are ...
No, but I do think it's funny that you're saddened by people who didn't immediately accept this story as reported.
What ignorance? I conduct gender sensitive sociological research interviews, in Africa, of various kinds. Given a basic knowledge of birth control and developing world women, the explanation for the data is obvious.
I've no doubt I'll be vindicated. Perhaps it will take a month or so.
What exactly is the reaction in this thread that is "sad"?
Yes. I and others are laughing at your assertion.
You're saying there isn';t much evidence so it must not be true. That's appealing to ignorance, regardless of your credentials
No, I cited people using it Correctrly.
Namely Planned Parenthood and the Mayo Clinic.
Tucker's cited Only his always wrong source .. himself.
Last-word away but, as usual, you not only got your clock cleaned, but got caught Dishonestly short-quoting me in service of that, and now.... Lying/mischaracterizing my expert sources as using terms incorrectly. (!)
I understood the point. It just failed logically.
I wasn't aware that you had a mouse in your pocket.
I have already said that in either case it was wrong.You are going to great lengths to argue a point that is irrelevant to the charges in the OP. I find that interesting. Whether it is called temporary sterilization, birth control, or anything else does not change the nature of the allegation.
No it didnt fail objectively... Youre a lib so everything is painted through lib subjectivity...sorry.
maybe it would make sense to you if Al Gore said it?
Actually, you are claiming that those sources use it correctly. It boils down to whether some one accepts your claim based on your word.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?